Multiscale three-dimensional scaffolds for soft tissue engineering via multimodal electrospinning.

A novel (scalable) electrospinning process was developed to fabricate bio-inspired multiscale three-dimensional scaffolds endowed with a controlled multimodal distribution of fiber diameters and geared towards soft tissue engineering. The resulting materials finely mingle nano- and microscale fibers together, rather than simply juxtaposing them, as is commonly found in the literature. A detailed proof of concept study was conducted on a simpler bimodal poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold with modes of fiber distribution at 600 nm and 3.3 microm. Three conventional unimodal scaffolds with mean diameters of 300 nm and 2.6 and 5.2 microm, respectively, were used as controls to evaluate the new materials. Characterization of the microstructure (i.e. porosity, fiber distribution and pore structure) and mechanical properties (i.e. stiffness, strength and failure mode) indicated that the multimodal scaffold had superior mechanical properties (Young's modulus approximately 40MPa and strength approximately 1MPa) in comparison with the controls, despite the large porosity ( approximately 90% on average). A biological assessment was conducted with bone marrow stromal cell type (mesenchymal stem cells, mTERT-MSCs). While the new material compared favorably with the controls with respect to cell viability (on the outer surface), it outperformed them in terms of cell colonization within the scaffold. The latter result, which could neither be practically achieved in the controls nor expected based on current models of pore size distribution, demonstrated the greater openness of the pore structure of the bimodal material, which remarkably did not come at the expense of its mechanical properties. Furthermore, nanofibers were seen to form a nanoweb bridging across neighboring microfibers, which boosted cell motility and survival. Lastly, standard adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation tests served to demonstrate that the new scaffold did not hinder the multilineage potential of stem cells.

[1]  D. Prockop,et al.  An Alizarin red-based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture: comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. , 2004, Analytical biochemistry.

[2]  E. Tanaka,et al.  Multidifferentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells in three-dimensional collagen gel cultures. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[3]  A. Caplan Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[4]  A. Salgado,et al.  Nano-and microfiber combined scaffolds : A new architecture for bone tissue engineering , 2011 .

[5]  L. Bonewald,et al.  Von Kossa Staining Alone Is Not Sufficient to Confirm that Mineralization In Vitro Represents Bone Formation , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[6]  Shulamit Levenberg,et al.  Tissue Engineering of Vascularized Cardiac Muscle From Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007, Circulation research.

[7]  M. Sefton,et al.  Tissue engineering. , 1998, Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[8]  F. Baaijens,et al.  Electrospinning versus knitting: two scaffolds for tissue engineering of the aortic valve , 2006, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[9]  D. Grainger,et al.  Fabrication of poly(α‐hydroxy acid) foam scaffolds using multiple solvent systems , 2002 .

[10]  K. Leong,et al.  The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[11]  A. Meunier,et al.  Tissue-engineered bone regeneration , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Michael S Sacks,et al.  Design and analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds that mimic soft tissue mechanical anisotropy. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[13]  A. Mikos,et al.  Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: a review. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[14]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering : Frontiers in biotechnology , 1993 .

[15]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Effect of fiber diameter on spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblastic cells on electrospun poly(lactic acid) substrates. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[16]  R J Cohen,et al.  Cardiac muscle tissue engineering: toward an in vitro model for electrophysiological studies. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[17]  R. W. Tock,et al.  Electrospinning of nanofibers , 2005 .

[18]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Cultivation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Without the Embryoid Body Step Enhances Osteogenesis In Vitro , 2006, Stem cells.

[19]  A. Salgado,et al.  Nano- and micro-fiber combined scaffolds: A new architecture for bone tissue engineering , 2005, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[20]  A. Mikos,et al.  Electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) microfiber and multilayer nanofiber/microfiber scaffolds: characterization of scaffolds and measurement of cellular infiltration. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[21]  Charles A. Vacanti,et al.  Transplantation of Chondrocytes Utilizing a Polymer‐Cell Construct to Produce Tissue‐Engineered Cartilage in the Shape of a Human Ear , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  Frank P T Baaijens,et al.  Tailoring fiber diameter in electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds for optimal cellular infiltration in cardiovascular tissue engineering. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[23]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[24]  G. Forte,et al.  Thick soft tissue reconstruction on highly perfusive biodegradable scaffolds. , 2010, Macromolecular bioscience.

[25]  Hongjun Song,et al.  The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[26]  Molly M Stevens,et al.  Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. , 2011, Science.

[27]  G. Forte,et al.  Interfacing Sca-1pos Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Biocompatible Scaffolds with Different Chemical Composition and Geometry , 2009, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[28]  Horst A von Recum,et al.  Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[29]  G. Forte,et al.  Tuning hierarchical architecture of 3D polymeric scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering , 2008 .

[30]  J. Vacanti,et al.  A biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[31]  Giovanni Vozzi,et al.  Criticality of the Biological and Physical Stimuli Array Inducing Resident Cardiac Stem Cell Determination , 2008, Stem cells.

[32]  R. Kirsner,et al.  Modulating Diseased Skin with Tissue Engineering: Actinic Purpura Treated with Apligraf , 2002, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[33]  Lorenzo Moroni,et al.  Fiber diameter and texture of electrospun PEOT/PBT scaffolds influence human mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and morphology, and the release of incorporated compounds. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[34]  S. Ramakrishna,et al.  Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly(L-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[35]  Wan-Ju Li,et al.  Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds: Production, Characterization, and Applications for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery , 2005 .

[36]  Erhan Piskin,et al.  Endothelial cell colonization and angiogenic potential of combined nano- and micro-fibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[37]  Richard Tuli,et al.  Multilineage differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[38]  William W. Sampson Modelling Stochastic Fibrous Materials with Mathematica , 2008 .

[39]  Sankha Bhowmick,et al.  Role of fiber diameter in adhesion and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblast on electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[40]  E. Zussman,et al.  3-D Nanofibrous electrospun multilayered construct is an alternative ECM mimicking scaffold , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[41]  S. Eichhorn,et al.  Statistical geometry of pores and statistics of porous nanofibrous assemblies , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[42]  Shulamit Levenberg,et al.  Effect of scaffold stiffness on myoblast differentiation. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[43]  E. Traversa,et al.  Localized compression and shear tests on nanotargets with a Berkovich tip and a novel multifunctional tip , 2009 .

[44]  T. Okano,et al.  Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Characterisation of a soft elastomer poly(glycerol sebacate) designed to match the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[46]  S. Iannace,et al.  Engineered mu-bimodal poly(epsilon-caprolactone) porous scaffold for enhanced hMSC colonization and proliferation. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.