Risk assessment and mitigation strategies for reactive metabolites in drug discovery and development.

Drug toxicity is a leading cause of attrition of candidate drugs during drug development as well as of withdrawal of drugs post-licensing due to adverse drug reactions in man. These adverse drug reactions cause a broad range of clinically severe conditions including both highly reproducible and dose dependent toxicities as well as relatively infrequent and idiosyncratic adverse events. The underlying risk factors can be split into two groups: (1) drug-related and (2) patient-related. The drug-related risk factors include metabolic factors that determine the propensity of a molecule to form toxic reactive metabolites (RMs), and the RM and non-RM mediated mechanisms which cause cell and tissue injury. Patient related risk factors may vary markedly between individuals, and encompass genetic and non-genetic processes, e.g. environmental, that influence the disposition of drugs and their metabolites, the nature of the adverse responses elicited and the resulting biological consequences. We describe a new strategy, which builds upon the strategies used currently within numerous pharmaceutical companies to avoid and minimize RM formation during drug discovery, and that is intended to reduce the likelihood that candidate drugs will cause toxicity in the human population. The new strategy addresses drug-related safety hazards, but not patient-related risk factors. A common target organ of toxicity is the liver and to decrease the likelihood that candidate drugs will cause liver toxicity (both non-idiosyncratic and idiosyncratic), we propose use of an in vitro Hepatic Liability Panel alongside in vitro methods for the detection of RMs. This will enable design and selection of compounds in discovery that have reduced propensity to cause liver toxicity. In vitro Hepatic Liability is assessed using toxicity assays that quantify: CYP 450 dependent and CYP 450 independent cell toxicity; mitochondrial impairment; and inhibition of the Bile Salt Export Pump. Prior to progression into development, a Hepatotoxicity Hazard Matrix combines data from the Hepatic Liability Panel with the Estimated RM Body Burden. The latter is defined as the level of covalent binding of radiolabelled drug to human hepatocyte proteins in vitro adjusted for the predicted human dose. We exemplify the potential value of this approach by consideration of the thiazolidinedione class of drugs.

[1]  Dominic P. Williams,et al.  Idiosyncratic toxicity: the role of toxicophores and bioactivation. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[2]  G. Opiteck,et al.  Identification of in vitro protein biomarkers of idiosyncratic liver toxicity. , 2004, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[3]  A. Bader,et al.  Hepatotoxicity and hepatic metabolism of available drugs: current problems and possible solutions in preclinical stages , 2010, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[4]  A. Y. Lu,et al.  Metabolic bioactivation and drug-related adverse effects: current status and future directions from a pharmaceutical research perspective , 2010, Drug metabolism reviews.

[5]  J. Uetrecht,et al.  Idiosyncratic drug reactions: current understanding. , 2007, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[6]  T. Baillie,et al.  Approaches for minimizing metabolic activation of new drug candidates in drug discovery. , 2010, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[7]  Masashi Yabuki,et al.  Evaluation of the Potential for Drug-Induced Liver Injury Based on in Vitro Covalent Binding to Human Liver Proteins , 2009, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[8]  L. James,et al.  Mechanisms of acetaminophen-induced liver necrosis. , 2010, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[9]  A. Kalgutkar,et al.  Can in vitro metabolism-dependent covalent binding data distinguish hepatotoxic from nonhepatotoxic drugs? An analysis using human hepatocytes and liver S-9 fraction. , 2009, Chemical research in toxicology.

[10]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Idiosyncratic toxicity: a convergence of risk factors. , 2007, Annual review of medicine.

[11]  J. G. Kenna,et al.  Cell based approaches for evaluation of drug-induced liver injury. , 2010, Toxicology.

[12]  N. Hewitt,et al.  Differential in vitro hepatotoxicity of troglitazone and rosiglitazone among cryopreserved human hepatocytes from 37 donors. , 2002, Chemico-biological interactions.

[13]  P. Ganey,et al.  Intrinsic versus Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity—Two Villains or One? , 2010, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[14]  What is idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity? What is it not? , 2008, Hepatology.

[15]  Peter Greaves,et al.  First dose of potential new medicines to humans: how animals help , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[16]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[17]  D. Pessayre,et al.  Mitochondrial involvement in drug-induced liver injury. , 2010, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[18]  W. M. Lee,et al.  Drug-induced hepatotoxicity. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  W. Isley Hepatotoxicity of thiazolidinediones , 2003, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[20]  H. Satoh,et al.  Potential metabolic basis for enflurane hepatitis and the apparent cross-sensitization between enflurane and halothane. , 1988, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[21]  T. Baillie,et al.  Drug-protein adducts: an industry perspective on minimizing the potential for drug bioactivation in drug discovery and development. , 2004, Chemical research in toxicology.

[22]  A. Kalgutkar,et al.  Minimising the potential for metabolic activation in drug discovery , 2005, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[23]  Y. Masubuchi Metabolic and non-metabolic factors determining troglitazone hepatotoxicity: a review. , 2006, Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

[24]  J. Waring,et al.  Microarray Analysis of Lipopolysaccharide Potentiation of Trovafloxacin-Induced Liver Injury in Rats Suggests a Role for Proinflammatory Chemokines and Neutrophils , 2006, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[25]  Ivan Rusyn,et al.  Mouse population-guided resequencing reveals that variants in CD44 contribute to acetaminophen-induced liver injury in humans. , 2009, Genome research.

[26]  B. Andrews,et al.  New Technologies and Screening Strategies for Hepatotoxicity: Use of In Vitro Models , 2005, Toxicologic pathology.

[27]  D. McNally,et al.  Bioactivation of Minocycline to Reactive Intermediates by Myeloperoxidase, Horseradish Peroxidase, and Hepatic Microsomes: Implications for Minocycline-Induced Lupus and Hepatitis , 2009, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[28]  Walker Inman,et al.  Liver tissue engineering in the evaluation of drug safety , 2009, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[29]  Bruno Stieger,et al.  Enterohepatic bile salt transporters in normal physiology and liver disease. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[30]  M. T. Donato,et al.  In vitro evaluation of potential hepatotoxicity induced by drugs. , 2010, Current pharmaceutical design.

[31]  R Scott Obach,et al.  Can in vitro metabolism-dependent covalent binding data in liver microsomes distinguish hepatotoxic from nonhepatotoxic drugs? An analysis of 18 drugs with consideration of intrinsic clearance and daily dose. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[32]  J. Waring,et al.  Idiosyncratic toxicity: mechanistic insights gained from analysis of prior compounds. , 2005, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[33]  Yvonne Will,et al.  The significance of mitochondrial toxicity testing in drug development. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[34]  M. Pirmohamed,et al.  Adverse drug reactions and pharmacogenomics: recent advances. , 2008, Personalized medicine.

[35]  Chandan Saha,et al.  Relationship between daily dose of oral medications and idiosyncratic drug‐induced liver injury: Search for signals , 2008, Hepatology.

[36]  P. Ganey,et al.  Lipopolysaccharide and trovafloxacin coexposure in mice causes idiosyncrasy-like liver injury dependent on tumor necrosis factor-alpha. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[37]  Osamu Okazaki,et al.  A Zone Classification System for Risk Assessment of Idiosyncratic Drug Toxicity Using Daily Dose and Covalent Binding , 2009, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[38]  P Smith,et al.  Concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans and in animals. , 2000, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[39]  R. Moseley,et al.  Effect of thiazolidinediones on bile acid transport in rat liver. , 2007, Life sciences.

[40]  Ignazio Grattagliano,et al.  Current Concepts of Mechanisms in Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity , 2009, Current medicinal chemistry.

[41]  Mechanisms of Drug Hepatotoxicity in Man: Novel Insights Provided by the THLE-CYP Cell Panel , 2009 .

[42]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  Predicting safety toleration of pharmaceutical chemical leads: cytotoxicity correlations to exploratory toxicity studies. , 2010, Toxicology letters.

[43]  H. Masumoto,et al.  Covalent Binding and Tissue Distribution/Retention Assessment of Drugs Associated with Idiosyncratic Drug Toxicity , 2008, Drug Metabolism And Disposition.