Trajectory-based identification of critical instantaneous decision events at mixed-flow signalized intersections.

Mixed-flow intersections are prevailing in many developing countries such as China and India. At mixed-flow intersections, there is no clear lane discipline or regular trajectories within the intersection, especially for the non-motorized traffic. This leads to more interactions and encounters between the motorized traffic and the non-motorized traffic. Hence, critical instantaneous decision events such as abrupt accelerating, decelerating, jerking, swerving, and swinging, may occur more frequently, which result in potential traffic conflicts and crashes. This study presents a methodology to identify critical instantaneous decision events at the mixed-flow signalized intersections, based on the entropy theory and high-resolution vehicle trajectory data. A three-dimensional cube searching algorithm is firstly proposed to extract general traffic events by examining the proximity between trajectories. A novel model incorporating vehicle kinematics and Permutation Entropy is then developed to identify critical events, by quantifying driving volatility based on the time-serial trajectory data. Next, 3, 349 vehicle trajectories and 805 bicycle trajectories with a resolution of 0.12 s collected at a signalized intersection in Shanghai are used to demonstrate the proposed method. Results show that the proposed method is capable of identifying critical instantaneous decision events, and tends to produce a higher identification ratio comparing with the conventional method solely based on kinematic thresholds. A sensitivity analysis is also conducted to investigate the effects of model parameters on the performance of the proposed method. The presented work could be applied for traffic safety assessment, real-time driving alert systems, and early diagnosis of risk-prone road users at mixed-flow intersections.

[1]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  A novel framework to evaluate pedestrian safety at non-signalized locations. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Hideki Nakamura,et al.  TrafficAnalyzer - the integrated video image processing system for traffic flow analysis , 2006 .

[3]  Jooyoung Lee,et al.  A framework for evaluating aggressive driving behaviors based on in-vehicle driving records , 2017, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[4]  B. Pompe,et al.  Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[5]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Development of a method for detecting jerks in safety critical events. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Brian L. Smith,et al.  Identification of safety-critical events using kinematic vehicle data and the discrete fourier transform. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Keping Li,et al.  Evaluation of pedestrian safety at intersections: A theoretical framework based on pedestrian-vehicle interaction patterns. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Jeffery Archer,et al.  Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modelling : a study of urban and suburban intersections , 2005 .

[9]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts Using Video Data , 2009 .

[10]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  What Is the Level of Volatility in Instantaneous Driving Decisions , 2015 .

[11]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Automated Analysis of Road Safety with Video Data , 2007 .

[12]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Detecting Powered-Two-Wheeler incidents from high resolution naturalistic data , 2014 .

[13]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Comparison of Time-Proximity and Evasive Action Conflict Measures: Case Studies from Five Cities , 2017 .

[14]  Elgar Fleisch,et al.  Spatial prediction of traffic accidents with critical driving events – Insights from a nationwide field study , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[15]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Developing evasive action‐based indicators for identifying pedestrian conflicts in less organized traffic environments , 2016 .

[16]  Jian Sun,et al.  A two-dimensional simulation model for modelling turning vehicles at mixed-flow intersections , 2017 .

[17]  Jing Li,et al.  Using Permutation Entropy to Measure the Changes in EEG Signals During Absence Seizures , 2014, Entropy.

[18]  C. Hydén,et al.  Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Reza Langari,et al.  Intelligent energy management agent for a parallel hybrid vehicle-part I: system architecture and design of the driving situation identification process , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[20]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  How is driving volatility related to intersection safety? A Bayesian heterogeneity-based analysis of instrumented vehicles data , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[21]  Osvaldo A. Rosso,et al.  Bandt–Pompe approach to the classical-quantum transition , 2007 .

[22]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Jerky driving--An indicator of accident proneness? , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Evaluating the safety and operational impacts of left-turn bay extension at signalized intersections using automated video analysis. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Assessing safety critical braking events in naturalistic driving studies , 2013 .

[25]  Bruce Simons-Morton,et al.  Vehicle ownership and other predictors of teenagers risky driving behavior: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Traffic conflict models to evaluate the safety of signalized intersections at the cycle level , 2018 .

[27]  Fred Feng,et al.  Can vehicle longitudinal jerk be used to identify aggressive drivers? An examination using naturalistic driving data. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.