Abstract Fast breeder reactors are capable of producing high fuel burnup because of higher internal breeding of fissile material and lesser parasitic capture of neutrons in the core. As these reactors need high fissile enrichment, high fuel burnup is desirable to be cost effective and to reduce the load on fuel reprocessing and fabrication plants. A pool type, liquid sodium cooled, mixed (Pu–U) oxide fueled 500 MWe prototype fast breeder reactor (PFBR), under construction at Kalpakkam is designed for a peak burnup of 100 GWd/t. This limitation on burnup is purely due to metallurgical properties of structural materials like clad and hexcan to withstand high neutron fluence, and not by the limitation on the excess reactivity available in the core. The 3D core burnup studies performed earlier for approach to equilibrium core of PFBR is continued to demonstrate the burnup potential of existing PFBR core. To increase the fuel burnup of PFBR, plutonium oxide enrichment is increased from 20.7%/27.7% to 22.1%/29.4% of core-1/core-2 which resulted in cycle length increase from 180 to 250 effective full power days (efpd), so that the peak fuel burnup increases from 100 to 134 GWd/t, keeping all the core parameters under allowed safety limits. Number of diluents subassemblies is increased from eight to twelve at beginning of life core to bring down the initial core excess reactivity. PFBR refueling is revised to accommodate twelve diluents. Increase of 10B enrichment in control safety rods (CSRs) and diverse safety rods (DSRs) is made along with a design change in CSRs to increase the reactivity worth of absorber rods for ensuring safe reactor operation. This new enhanced burnup core can be used in the future with advanced structural materials for clad and hexcan, which can withstand higher neutron fluence and gamma radiation.
[1]
V. I. Prokhorov,et al.
A Study of Four Experimental Fuel Subassemblies Using EP-450 Ferritic-Martensitic Pin Claddings and Hexagonal Ducts after Irradiation to 108-163 dpa in the BOR-60 Reactor, invited
,
2010
.
[2]
K. Devan,et al.
A new physics design of control safety rods for prototype fast breeder reactor
,
2008
.
[3]
Baldev Raj,et al.
Current Status of Fast Reactors and Future Plans in India
,
2011
.
[4]
P. Mohanakrishnan,et al.
Approach to equilibrium fuelling scheme of 500 MWe PFBR based on 3-D core burnup modeling
,
2011
.
[5]
P. Mohanakrishnan,et al.
Development and validation of a fast reactor core burnup code – FARCOB
,
2008
.
[6]
P. Chellapandi,et al.
The design of the prototype Fast Breeder Reactor
,
2006
.
[7]
P. Chellapandi,et al.
A comparative study of FARCOB and ERANOS-2.1 neutronics codes in predicting the Phenix control rod withdrawal end-of-life experimental results
,
2012
.
[8]
B. Raj.
Materials science research for sodium cooled fast reactors
,
2009
.
[9]
Baldev Raj,et al.
Development of fuels and structural materials for fast breeder reactors
,
2002
.