Home advantage in high-level volleyball varies according to set number.

The aim of the present study was to identify the probability of winning each Volleyball set according to game location (home, away). Archival data was obtained from 275 sets in the 2005 Men's Senior World League and 65,949 actions were analysed. Set result (win, loss), game location (home, away), set number (first, second, third, fourth and fifth) and performance indicators (serve, reception, set, attack, dig and block) were the variables considered in this study. In a first moment, performance indicators were used in a logistic model of set result, by binary logistic regression analysis. After finding the adjusted logistic model, the log-odds of winning the set were analysed according to game location and set number. The results showed that winning a set is significantly related to performance indicators (Chisquare(18)=660.97, p<0.01). Analyses of log-odds of winning a set demonstrate that home teams always have more probability of winning the game than away teams, regardless of the set number. Home teams have more advantage at the beginning of the game (first set) and in the two last sets of the game (fourth and fifth sets), probably due to facilities familiarity and crowd effects. Different game actions explain these advantages and showed that to win the first set is more important to take risk, through a better performance in the attack and block, and to win the final set is important to manage the risk through a better performance on the reception. These results may suggest intra-game variation in home advantage and can be most useful to better prepare and direct the competition. Key pointsHome teams always have more probability of winning the game than away teams.Home teams have higher performance in reception, set and attack in the total of the sets.The advantage of home teams is more pronounced at the beginning of the game (first set) and in two last sets of the game (fourth and fifth sets) suggesting intra-game variation in home advantage.Analysis by sets showed that home teams have a better performance in the attack and block in the first set and in the reception in the third and fifth sets.

[1]  José M. Palao,et al.  Effect of team level on skill performance in volleyball , 2004 .

[2]  Steven D. Houseworth,et al.  Structural Charting and Perceptions of Momentum in Intercollegiate Volleyball , 1995 .

[3]  H. M. Wallace,et al.  Audience support and choking under pressure: A home disadvantage? , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.

[4]  Denis Brunt,et al.  Jumping and Landing Techniques in Elite Women's Volleyball. , 2004, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[5]  Martin Lames,et al.  Modelling the interaction in game sports - relative phase and moving correlations. , 2006, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[6]  S. Bray,et al.  The home advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron's (1992) conceptual framework a decade later , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  P. A. Richardson,et al.  Game, Set, Match: Psychological Momentum in Tennis , 1988 .

[8]  A M Nevill,et al.  Home Advantage in Sport , 1999, Sports medicine.

[9]  R. Schutz,et al.  Statistical analyses of volleyball team performance. , 1992, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[10]  G. Zimet,et al.  The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support , 1988 .

[11]  Patrón de conducta Tipo-A y estrés en deportistas adolescentes:algunas variables mediadoras , 2001 .

[12]  A. Carrón,et al.  Facility familiarity and the home advantage in professional sports , 2003 .

[13]  Jaime Sampaio,et al.  Game location influences basketball players' performance across playing positions. , 2008 .

[14]  I. Mesquita,et al.  The weight of terminal actions in Volleyball. Contributions of the spike, serve and block for the teams’ rankings in the World League 2005 , 2008 .

[15]  Richard Pollard,et al.  Worldwide regional variations in home advantage in association football , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  M. Lieberman,et al.  The stress process. , 1981, Journal of health and social behavior.

[17]  Richard Pollard,et al.  Home Advantage in Football: A Current Review of an Unsolved Puzzle , 2008 .

[18]  R. Pollard,et al.  Home advantage in soccer: a review of its existence and causes , 2005 .

[19]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  The Home Advantage In Sport Competitions: A Literature Review , 1992 .

[20]  B. Schwartz,et al.  The Home Advantage , 1977 .

[21]  B JonesMarshall,et al.  Home Advantage in the NBA as a Game-Long Process , 2007 .