Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues

Technical advances in landscape visualization have tended to, and still do, outstrip the understanding of how best to use them in practical planning contexts. This paper draws upon recent literature and experience gained during a number of projects to address three key questions regarding the most effective use of 3D landscape visualizations for communication purposes. In essence these are “when?” (to use them), “what?” (to include) and “how?” (to display them). Three main visualization options (rendered still images, animations and real-time models) are compared and particular constraints and strengths are discussed. In addition, an evaluation is made of the ability of the information presented in landscape visualizations to meet criteria of credibility, salience and legitimacy when communicating with stakeholders. Closing guidance is given on the use of visualizations in landscape planning and suggestions regarding future research needs are made. These focus on the need for applications of 3D visualization techniques to be more systematically evaluated, ideally as part of landscape planning exercises where the benefits of particular approaches for different purposes and audiences are examined across all stages of the decision-making process.

[1]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Exploring landscape changes using an envisioning system in rural community workshops , 2007 .

[3]  S. Sheppard Visualizing Climate Change: A Guide to Visual Communication of Climate Change and Developing Local Solutions , 2012 .

[4]  Eckart Lange 99 volumes later: We can visualise. Now what? , 2011 .

[5]  Ian D. Bishop Landscape planning is not a game: Should it be? , 2011 .

[6]  Ulrike Wissen Hayek,et al.  Which is the Appropriate 3D Visualization Type for Participatory Landscape Planning Workshops? A Portfolio of Their Effectiveness , 2011 .

[7]  Michael Kwartler,et al.  Visioning and Visualization: People, Pixels, and Plans , 2008 .

[8]  Gary Priestnall,et al.  Virtual Geographic Environments , 2012, GIScience 2012.

[9]  Stephen J Sheppard,et al.  Visual Simulation: A Users Guide for Architects, Engineers, and Planners , 1989 .

[10]  Eckart Lange,et al.  The limits of realism: perceptions of virtual landscapes , 2001 .

[11]  J. R Wherrett Issues in using the Internet as a medium for landscape preference research , 1999 .

[12]  Duncan Cavens,et al.  The multiple roles of environmental data visualization in evaluating alternative forest management strategies , 2005 .

[13]  Bartlett Warren-Kretzschmar,et al.  What Role Does Visualization Play in Communication with Citizens? - A Field Study from the Interactive Landscape Plan , 2005 .

[14]  Olaf Schroth,et al.  Tool or Toy? Virtual Globes in Landscape Planning , 2011, Future Internet.

[15]  M. Heim Virtual Realism , 1998 .

[16]  Andrew Jones,et al.  GIS-based landscape visualization: The state of the art , 2009 .

[17]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  Visualizing rural landscapes from GIS databases in real-time: A comparison of software and some future prospects , 2009 .

[18]  P. Selman Sustainable Landscape Planning: The Reconnection Agenda , 2012 .

[19]  Ervin H. Zube,et al.  Perceptual Landscape Simulations: History and Prospect , 1987, Landscape Journal.

[20]  Christopher Pettit,et al.  Identifying strengths and weaknesses of landscape visualisation for effective communication of future alternatives , 2011 .

[21]  Stephen Ervin,et al.  Landscape Modeling: Digital Techniques for Landscape Visualization , 2001 .

[22]  Stephen R.J. Sheppard,et al.  Bridging the sustainability gap with landscape visualisation in community visioning hubs , 2006 .

[23]  Olaf Schroth,et al.  Approaches to integrating indicators into 3D landscape visualisations and their benefits for participative planning situations. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  A. Lovett,et al.  Public opinion on energy crops in the landscape: considerations for the expansion of renewable energy from biomass , 2012 .

[25]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: Process, implementation, and evaluation , 1999 .

[26]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  Visualising the potential impacts of climate change on rural landscapes , 2005, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[27]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  Visualization Tools and Methods for Participatory Planning and Design , 2001 .

[28]  John Danahy,et al.  Technology for dynamic viewing and peripheral vision in landscape visualization , 2001 .

[29]  Thomas Olsson,et al.  User evaluation of mobile augmented reality in architectural planning , 2012 .

[30]  David Miller,et al.  Landscape Metrics and Visual Topology in the Analysis of Landscape Preference , 2008 .

[31]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: Defining 'sufficient' realism for environmental decision-making , 2003 .

[32]  David W. Cash,et al.  Information as Influence: How Institutions Mediate the Impact of Scientific Assessments on Global Environmental Affairs , 2002 .

[33]  Eckart Lange,et al.  Making visions visible for long-term landscape management. , 2010 .

[34]  Stewart J. Cohen,et al.  Making local futures tangible - synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. , 2009 .

[35]  Stephen Ervin,et al.  Digital landscape modeling and visualization: a research agenda , 2001 .

[36]  Brian G. Maddox,et al.  Real-time visualization techniques , 2009 .

[37]  Olaf Schroth,et al.  Multiple-Case Study of Landscape Visualizations as a Tool in Transdisciplinary Planning Workshops , 2011, Landscape Journal.

[38]  Andreas Muhar,et al.  The role of computer visualization in the communication of urban design—A comparison of viewer responses to visualizations versus on-site visits , 2009 .

[39]  Gary Higgs,et al.  Web‐based GIS Approaches to Enhance Public Participation in Wind Farm Planning , 2011, Trans. GIS.

[40]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Experiential approaches to perception response in virtual worlds , 2001 .

[41]  Michael Roth,et al.  Validating the use of internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment : An empirical study from Germany , 2006 .

[42]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Visual assessment of off-shore wind turbines: The influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables , 2007 .

[43]  Cam Campbell,et al.  The digital workshop: exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Evaluation of Data Visualisation Options for Land-Use Policy and Decision Making in Response to Climate Change , 2013 .

[45]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Realism and selectivity in data-driven visualisations: A process for developing viewer-oriented landscape surrogates , 2007 .

[46]  Bartlett Warren-Kretzschmar,et al.  The interactive landscape plan: Use and benefits of new technologies in landscape planning and discussion of the interactive landscape plan in Koenigslutter am Elm, Germany , 2006 .

[47]  Brian Orland,et al.  Considering virtual worlds as representations of landscape realities and as tools for landscape planning , 2001 .

[48]  P. Selman Planning at the Landscape Scale , 2006 .

[49]  Eckart Lange,et al.  Scenario-visualization for the assessment of perceived green space qualities at the urban-rural fringe. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[50]  Stephen R.J. Sheppard,et al.  Guidance for crystal ball gazers: developing a code of ethics for landscape visualization , 2001 .

[51]  Robert MacFarlane,et al.  Peering through the smoke? Tensions in landscape visualisation , 2005, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[52]  Victor Sposito,et al.  Developing a multi-scale visualisation framework for use in climate change response , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[53]  Jeremy W. Crampton,et al.  Interactivity Types in Geographic Visualization , 2002 .

[54]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication , 2005, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[55]  P. Verburg,et al.  Identifying assets and constraints for rural development with qualitative scenarios: A case study of Castro Laboreiro, Portugal , 2011 .

[56]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling , 2007 .

[57]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  Display methods for real-time landscape models – an initial comparison , 2005 .

[58]  Coleby,et al.  Visualization Techniques to Support Planning of Renewable Energy Developments , 2007 .

[59]  Denis Wood,et al.  The Natures of Maps: Cartographic Constructions of the Natural World , 2008, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[60]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  Rural landscape visualisation from GIS databases: a comparison of approaches, options and problems , 2002 .

[61]  T. O'riordan,et al.  Landscapes for tomorrow , 1993 .

[62]  Olaf Gerhard Schroth From Information to Participation: Interactive Landscape Visualization as a Tool for Collaborative Planning , 2010 .

[63]  T. Daniel,et al.  REPRESENTATIONAL VALIDITY OF LANDSCAPE VISUALIZATIONS: THE EFFECTS OF GRAPHICAL REALISM ON PERCEIVED SCENIC BEAUTY OF FOREST VISTAS , 2001 .

[64]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Integration of augmented reality and GIS: A new approach to realistic landscape visualisation , 2008 .

[65]  Massimo Ragnedda,et al.  The Digital Divide , 2020, The Information Society Reader.

[66]  G. Aggett,et al.  Evaluating Decision Support Systems for PPGIS Applications , 2006 .