We Face, I Tweet: How Different Social Media Influence Political Participation through Collective and Internal Efficacy

This study advances a theoretical model centered on collective and internal efficacy to explain the separate pathways through which political sharing on Facebook and Twitter may influence individuals to engage in political activities. We test the model with data from a 2-wave panel survey conducted with an adult population in 2013 in Chile. We found that frequent usage of Facebook and Twitter for sharing political information is conducive to higher levels of participation through different efficacy measures. Facebook has a significant effect on collective—not internal—efficacy, whereas Twitter's effect is on internal—not collective—efficacy. Results are discussed in light of the diverse affordances and strengths of network ties of Facebook and Twitter.

[1]  Francis L. F. Lee.  The Perceptual Bases of Collective Efficacy and Protest Participation: The Case of Pro-Democracy Protests in Hong Kong , 2010 .

[2]  M. Hooghe,et al.  Conceptualizing political participation , 2014 .

[3]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Youth collective activism through social media: The role of collective efficacy , 2015, New Media Soc..

[4]  Shelley Boulianne.  Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research , 2015 .

[5]  M. Mangum.  Psychological Involvement and Black Voter Turnout , 2003 .

[6]  Andrew N. Smith,et al.  How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? , 2012 .

[7]  S. Valenzuela.  Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior , 2013 .

[8]  R. Niemi,et al.  Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[9]  Debbie Goh,et al.  Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review , 2016, New Media Soc..

[10]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[11]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[12]  Sedef Turper,et al.  External Efficacy and Perceived Responsiveness—Similar but Distinct Concepts , 2015 .

[13]  Diana C. Mutz.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[14]  Andreas Jungherr.  Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review , 2016 .

[15]  Mark Batey,et al.  A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Jeffrey Levine,et al.  The Dynamics of Collective Deliberation in the 1996 Election: Campaign Effects on Accessibility, Certainty, and Accuracy , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Martin Hilbert,et al.  One Step, Two Step, Network Step? Complementary Perspectives on Communication Flows in Twittered Citizen Protests , 2017 .

[18]  S. Finkel.  Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis , 1985 .

[19]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  The Decline of Electoral Participation in America , 1982 .

[20]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies , 2014 .

[21]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[22]  Ken'ichi Ikeda,et al.  Social capital online: Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy , 2006 .

[23]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain , 2002 .

[24]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks , 2004 .

[25]  R. Levine,et al.  Political efficacy: Enhancing the construct and its relationship to mobilization of people , 1994 .

[26]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  The Use of Enterprise Social Network Sites for Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Organizations , 2015 .

[28]  Nicolás M. Somma,et al.  Shifting Relationships Between Social Movements and Institutional Politics , 2017 .

[29]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  R I M Dunbar,et al.  Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[31]  Michael E. Morrell.  Deliberation, Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy , 2005 .

[32]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[33]  M. Broersma,et al.  BETWEEN BROADCASTING POLITICAL MESSAGES AND INTERACTING WITH VOTERS , 2012 .

[34]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Information and Expression in a Digital Age , 2005, Commun. Res..

[35]  Shawn M. Bergman,et al.  Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  It's Complicated: Facebook Users' Political Participation in the 2008 Election , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[38]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Social network activity and social well-being , 2010, CHI.

[39]  Elizabeth Smith,et al.  The Effects of Investments in theSocial Capital of Youth on Political and Civic Behavior in Young Adulthood: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1999 .

[40]  L. Bode.  Facebooking It to the Polls: A Study in Online Social Networking and Political Behavior , 2012 .

[41]  Ki Joon Kim,et al.  What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter , 2014 .