The Small Sample Properties of Simultaneous Equation Least Absolute Estimators vis-a-vis Least Squares Estimators

In this paper a distribution sampling study consisting of four major experiments is described. The L1 norm is employed in two new estimating techniques, direct least absolute (DLA) and two-stage least absolute (TSLA), and these two are compared to direct least squares (DLS) and two-stage least squares (TSLS). Four experiments testing the normal distribution case, a multicollinearity problem, a heteroskedastic variance problem, and a misspecified model were conducted. Two small sample sizes were used in each experiment, one with N = 20 and one with N = 10. In addition, conditional predictions were made using the reduced form of the four estimators plus two direct methods, least squares no restrictions (LSNR) and another new method known as least absolute no restrictions (LANR). The general conclusion was that the L1 norm estimators should prove equal to or superior to the L2 norm estimators for models using a structure similar to the overidentified one specified for this study, with randomly distributed error terms and very small sample sizes. BEGINNING WITH the method developed by Haavelmo [11] for solving the problem of single equation bias, econometricians have devoted considerable effort to developing additional methods for estimating the structural parameters of simultaneous equation models [2,12,20,24]. While it has been fairly easy to develop the asymptotic properties of these estimators, a distinguishing characteristic of econometric models is that they are invariably based upon small samples of data and thus, the asymptotic properties of the various estimators are not

[1]  R. Quandt.  ON CERTAIN SMALL SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF k-CLASS ESTIMATORS* , 1965 .

[2]  Econometric Models and Methods , 1967 .

[3]  T. Koopmans.  Statistical inference in dynamic economic models , 1951 .

[4]  R. L. Basmann.  A GENERALIZED CLASSICAL METHOD OF LINEAR ESTIMATION OF COEFFICIENTS IN A STRUCTURAL EQUATION , 1957 .

[5]  T. D. Wallace,et al.  A Sampling Study of Minimum Absolute Deviations Estimators , 1963 .

[6]  F. Y. Edgeworth.  XXII. On a new method of reducing observations relating to several quantities , 1888 .

[7]  H. Theil,et al.  Three-Stage Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations , 1962 .

[8]  J. Rice,et al.  Norms for Smoothing and Estimation , 1964 .

[9]  Karl H. Usow,et al.  On $L_1 $ Approximation I: Computation for Continuous Functions and Continuous Dependence , 1967 .

[10]  Robert Summers,et al.  A Capital-Intensive Approach to the Small Sample Properties of Various Simultaneous Equation Estimators , 1965 .

[11]  H. Theil,et al.  Economic Forecasts and Policy. , 1959 .

[12]  G. Ladd.  Effects of Shocks and Errors in Estimation: An Empirical Comparison , 1956 .

[13]  T. Haavelmo.  The Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations , 1943 .

[14]  A. L. Nagar.  The Bias and Moment Matrix of the General k-Class Estimators of the Parameters in Simultaneous Equations , 1959 .

[15]  Z. Birnbaum.  Numerical Tabulation of the Distribution of Kolmogorov's Statistic for Finite Sample Size , 1952 .