Perceiving Human Locomotion: Priming Effects in Direction Discrimination

During the perception of biological motion, the available stimulus information is confined to a small number of lights attached to the major joints of a moving actor. Despite this drastic impoverishment of the stimulus, the human visual apparatus organizes the swarm of moving dots in a vivid percept of a human figure. In addition, observers effortlessly identify the action the figure is involved in. After a historical introduction and a short walk through the literature, data from a priming experiment are presented. In a serial two-choice reaction-time task, participants were presented with a point-light walker, facing either to the right or to the left and walking either forward or backward on a treadmill. Subjects had to identify the direction of articulatory movements. Reliable priming effects were established in consecutive trials, but these effects were tempered by the relation between priming and primed walker. The reaction time to a walker was shorter when the walker in the preceding trial moved in the same direction and was facing in the same direction. The findings are discussed in relation to recent data from neuropsychological case studies, neuroimaging, and single-cell recording.

[1]  Eadweard Muybridge,et al.  The Human Figure in Motion , 1955 .

[2]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[3]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[4]  G. Johansson.  Visual motion perception. , 1975, Scientific American.

[5]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[6]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[7]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the gender of walkers from point-lights mounted on ankles: Some second thoughts , 1978 .

[8]  J. Cutting,et al.  Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  James E. Cutting,et al.  A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays , 1978 .

[10]  J E Cutting,et al.  A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  T. Beardsworth,et al.  The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of one’s movements without seeing one’s body , 1981 .

[13]  S. Runeson,et al.  Visual perception of lifted weight. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  J. Cutting.  Coding Theory Adapted to Gait Perception , 1981 .

[15]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the movements of shapes , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  N. Mai,et al.  Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  J. Todd.  Perception of gait. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[19]  R. D. Walk,et al.  Emotion and dance in dynamic light displays , 1984 .

[20]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual analysis of body movements by neurones in the temporal cortex of the macaque monkey: A preliminary report , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  J. Montepare,et al.  The identification of emotions from gait information , 1987 .

[22]  D. E. Frable,et al.  Sex-typed execution and perception of expressive movement. , 1987 .

[23]  G. Bingham,et al.  Kinematic form and scaling: further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  J. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  J. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. , 1988 .

[26]  J E Cutting,et al.  Masking the motions of human gait , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  D I Perrett,et al.  Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  G. Micheletti.  Le mouvement, E. Godaux, G. Cheron. Medsi/McGraw Hill, London (1989), 300 p., 240 illustrations , 1989 .

[29]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Visual responses of sheep temporal cortex cells to moving and stationary human images , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  T. Troscianko,et al.  AI and the eye , 1990 .

[31]  J. Freyd,et al.  Apparent Motion of the Human Body , 1990 .

[32]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[33]  N Mai,et al.  Disturbance of movement vision after bilateral posterior brain damage. Further evidence and follow up observations. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  K. Verfaillie.  Variant points of view on viewpoint invariance. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[36]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Implicit memory of dynamic information , 1992 .

[37]  D. Perrett,et al.  Time course of neural responses discriminating different views of the face and head. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  W. Dittrich.  Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion , 1993, Perception.

[39]  J. Freyd,et al.  Timing and Apparent Motion Path Choice With Human Body Photographs , 1993 .

[40]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications. , 1993 .

[41]  K. Verfaillie.  Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  G. Mather,et al.  Recognition of Animal Locomotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays , 1993, Perception.

[43]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[44]  D. Perrett,et al.  Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (STPa) Neurons to Biological Motion Stimuli , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  Gyöorgy Benedek,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to Development: Applications , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  D. Perrett,et al.  Recognition of objects and their component parts: responses of single units in the temporal cortex of the macaque. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Transsaccadic integration of biological motion. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  G. Mather,et al.  Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  M. Rizzo,et al.  Motion and shape perception in cerebral akinetopsia. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  M. Farah,et al.  The psychological reality of the body schema: a test with normal participants. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Carl E. Granrud,et al.  Visual perception and cognition in infancy , 1995 .

[52]  L. Parsons,et al.  Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET , 1995, Nature.

[53]  Sheba Heptulla Chatterjee,et al.  Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  J. Decety.  Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[56]  S. Lea,et al.  Perception of Emotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays Represented in Dance , 1996, Perception.

[57]  P. McLeod,et al.  Preserved and Impaired Detection of Structure From Motion by a 'Motion-blind" Patient , 1996 .

[58]  A. Cowey,et al.  Comparing the visual deficits of a motion blind patient with the visual deficits of monkeys with area MT removed , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Transsaccadic memory for the egocentric and allocentric position of a biological-motion walker. , 1997 .

[60]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The perception of biological motion across apertures , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[61]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of Biological Motion , 1997, Perception.

[62]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Priming and Recognition of Human Motion Patterns , 1997 .

[63]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[65]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[66]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Dynamic Representations of Human Body Movement , 1999, Perception.

[67]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Viewpoint-dependent Priming Effects in the Perception of Human Actions and Body Postures , 1999 .

[68]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Subconfigurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[69]  K Verfaillie,et al.  Transsaccadic memory for position and orientation of saccade source and target. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.