Towards all-author co-citation analysis

The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA): the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting: on the one hand, the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors, and on the other hand, a simplified approach to all-author co-citation counting that takes into account the first five authors of a cited work. Results indicate that the picture produced through this simplified all-author co-citation counting contains author groups that are more coherent, and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed. Variations of counting more than first authors are compared.

[1]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Elisabeth Logan,et al.  Citation analysis using scientific publications on the Web as data source: A case study in the XML research area , 2002, Scientometrics.

[4]  Henry Kreuzman.  A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: Examining the relationship between epistemologists and philosophers of science , 2001, Scientometrics.

[5]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .

[6]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Henry Small.  Visualizing science by citation mapping , 1999 .

[8]  Howard D. White,et al.  Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Dangzhi Zhao,et al.  Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science - A comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[10]  Howard D. White,et al.  Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Olle Persson.  All author citations versus first author citations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[12]  Dangzhi Zhao,et al.  Comparative Citation Analysis Study of Web-Based and Print Journal-Based Scholarly Communication in the XML Research Field , 2003 .

[13]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Digital Libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing , 1999, Computer.

[14]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview , 1990, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

[15]  Dangzhi Zhao,et al.  Web-based and print journal-based scholarly communication in the XML research field: A look at the intellectual structure , 2005, ASIST.

[16]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .