An Empirical Study of Standards Development for E-Businesses: A Social Network Perspective

Research on the nature of e-business standards and the organizational context in which they are developed has received little attention in the literature of IT standards and standardization. This study investigates communication patterns in online standards groups to provide insights into the nature of group dynamics among standards decision makers and its relation to the standards context. Email data is used from the ebXML standards initiative. Findings suggest that standards groups operating on the Internet appear to form a cohesive structure, despite the fact that they tend to consist of large group of participants coming from various backgrounds and industries, while their communication patterns are influenced by standards orientation. Policy implications for managers in online standards groups are presented.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[2]  D. Hemenway.  Industrywide voluntary product standards , 1975 .

[3]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[4]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[5]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity , 1984 .

[6]  M. Tushman.  Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis. , 1979 .

[7]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[8]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[9]  Martin H. Levinson.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2004 .

[10]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  The Sociological Concept of "Group": An Empirical Test of Two Models , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  C. Cargill.  Information technology standardization: Theory, process, and organizations , 1989 .

[12]  L. C. Verman,et al.  Standardization, a new discipline, , 1973 .

[13]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[14]  August E. Grant,et al.  Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging , 1990 .

[15]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[16]  Paul A. David,et al.  Formal standards-setting for global telecommunications and information services. Towards an institutional regime transformation? , 1996 .

[17]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[18]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks , 1999 .

[19]  Suresh K. Damodaran,et al.  ebXML: Concepts and Application , 2002 .

[20]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[21]  D. Linda Garcia,et al.  Standard setting in the United States: public and private sector roles , 1992, IEEE Micro.

[22]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Social groups in action and interaction , 2004 .

[23]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Addressing a standards creation process: a focus on ebXML , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups , 1990 .

[25]  Steven M. Spivak,et al.  SourceBook on Standards Information: Education, Access and Development , 1991 .

[26]  J. Knote.  Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[27]  Eric Chiu.  ebXML Simplified: A Guide to the New Standard for Global E-Commerce , 2002 .

[28]  S. Cavalcante.  Information Processing and Decision Making in Organizations. The Case of the Department of Fiscal-Administrative Affairs in Ceará (Brazil) , 2007 .

[29]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[30]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[31]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Alvin Toffler,et al.  パワーシフト : 21世紀へと変容する知識と富と暴力 = Powershift : knowledge, wealth, and violence at the edge of the 21st century , 1990 .

[33]  R. McQueen,et al.  A Cognitive Three-Process Model of Computer-Mediated Group Interaction , 2000 .

[34]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[35]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Polarization and Persuasive Argumentation: A Study of Decision Making in Group Settings , 1998, MIS Q..

[36]  R. Hawkins,et al.  The rise of consortia in the information and communication technology industries: emerging implications for policy , 1999 .

[37]  Martin B. H. Weiss,et al.  Consortia in the Standards Development Process. , 1992 .

[38]  J. L. Bogod.  Information Technology Standardization , 1990 .

[39]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[40]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[41]  Trevor J Williams,et al.  Powershift: Knowledge, wealth and violence at the edge of the 21st century , 1991 .

[42]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. , 1974 .

[43]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[44]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[45]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[46]  George D. Bishop,et al.  Informational influence in group discussion , 1974 .

[47]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group-problem-solving approach. , 1974 .

[48]  A. Gibbons.  Algorithmic Graph Theory , 1985 .

[49]  Yesha Y. Sivan.  Knowledge age standards: a brief introduction to their dimensions , 2000 .

[50]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[51]  R. Cotterrell,et al.  The Sociological Concept of Law , 1983 .