Relative influences of current and historical factors on mammal and bird diversity patterns in deglaciated North America

Aim To investigate the relative contributions of current vs. historical factors in explaining broad-scale diversity gradients using a combination of contemporary factors and a quantitative estimate of the temporal accessibility of areas for recolonization created by glacial retreat following the most recent Ice Age. Location The part of the Nearctic region of North America that was covered by ice sheets during the glacial maximum 20 000 BP. Methods We used range maps to estimate the species richness of mammals and terrestrial birds in 48 400 km(2) cells. Current conditions in each cell were quantified using seven climatic and topographical variables. Historical conditions were estimated using the number of years before present when an area became exposed as the ice sheets retreated during the post-Pleistocene climate warming. We attempted to tease apart contemporary and historical effects using multiple regression, partial regression and spatial autocorrelation analysis. Results A measure of current energy inputs, potential evapotranspiration, explained 76-82% of the variance in species richness, but time since deglaciation explained an additional 8-13% of the variance, primarily due to effects operating at large spatial scales. Because of spatial covariation between the historical climates influencing the melting of the ice sheet and current climates, it was not possible to partition their effects fully, but of the independent effects that could be identified, current climate explained two to seven times more variance in richness patterns than age. Main Conclusions Factors acting in the present appear to have the strongest influence on the diversity gradient, but an historical signal persisting at least 13 000 years is still detectable. This has implications for modelling changes in diversity patterns in response to future global warming.

[1]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[2]  P. Terent'ev Attempt at application of analysis of variation to the qualitative richness of the fauna of terrestrial vertebrates of the U.S.S.R , 1968 .

[3]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Tree species richness modelling: an approach of global applicability? , 2000 .

[4]  David J. Currie,et al.  Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees , 1987, Nature.

[5]  Jeremy J. D. Greenwood,et al.  Bird diversity and environmental gradients in Britain: a test of the species–energy hypothesis , 2000 .

[6]  E. C. Pielou,et al.  After the Ice Age : the return of life to glaciated North America , 1991 .

[7]  J. Kerr,et al.  Lepidopteran richness patterns in North America , 1998 .

[8]  D. Currie,et al.  Global patterns of tree species richness in moist forests : another look , 1998 .

[9]  T. M. Heggberget Number and proportion of southern bird species in Norway in relation to latitude, spring temperature and respiration equivalent , 1987 .

[10]  D. Post,et al.  Rapid and widespread vegetation responses to past climate change in the North Atlantic region , 2002 .

[11]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND HISTORY AS PREDICTORS OF THE LATITUDINAL DIVERSITY GRADIENT OF TERRESTRIAL BIRDS , 2003 .

[12]  J. Kerr,et al.  Remotely sensed habitat diversity predicts butterfly species richness and community similarity in Canada , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  David J. Currie,et al.  Projected Effects of Climate Change on Patterns of Vertebrate and Tree Species Richness in the Conterminous United States , 2001, Ecosystems.

[14]  The Mammals of North America , 1959 .

[15]  Brian A. Maurer,et al.  Energy supply and patterns of species richness on local and regional scales , 1993 .

[16]  J. Kerr,et al.  The environmental basis of North American species richness patterns among Epicauta (Coleoptera: Meloidae) , 1999, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[17]  C. Parmesan,et al.  Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming , 1999, Nature.

[18]  Jeremy T. Kerr,et al.  Habitat heterogeneity as a determinant of mammal species richness in high-energy regions , 1997, Nature.

[19]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[20]  M. Cardillo Latitude and rates of diversification in birds and butterflies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  David L. Fox,et al.  Ecological biogeography of North American mammals: species density and ecological structure in relation to environmental gradients , 2000 .

[22]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology , 2003 .

[23]  M. McGlone,et al.  When History Matters: Scale, Time, Climate and Tree Diversity , 1996 .

[24]  H. Gregory McDonald,et al.  Spatial Response of Mammals to Late Quaternary Environmental Fluctuations , 1996, Science.

[25]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Global patterns of tree species richness in moist forests : energy-diversity theory does not account for variation in species richness. , 1993 .

[26]  R. Manville,et al.  The Mammals of North America , 1959 .

[27]  P. Lundberg,et al.  Species richness in mammalian herbivores: patterns in the horeal zone , 1996 .

[28]  Jeremy T. Kerr,et al.  Butterfly Species Richness Patterns in Canada: Energy, Heterogeneity, and the Potential Consequences of Climate Change , 2001 .

[29]  D. Currie Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness , 1991, The American Naturalist.