Team capability beliefs over time: Distinguishing between team potency, team outcome efficacy, and team process efficacy

Teams that have positive beliefs about their capability tend to perform more effectively. However, relatively little is known about the nature and change of different types of team capability beliefs. Team potency and team efficacy are two approaches to understanding team capability beliefs, but few studies have considered these beliefs simultaneously. We investigate their distinctiveness and relative predictive power. Additionally, we propose two types of team efficacy: team outcome efficacy and team process efficacy. In two longitudinal samples of executive MBA study teams (sample 1, N = 213 individuals in 41 teams; sample 2, N = 360 individuals in 89 teams), we showed that team potency, team outcome efficacy, and team process efficacy are factorially distinct and measure invariant at four time points over 7 months (except for high levels of team outcome efficacy for which factorial invariance emerged). We also show differential predictive validity. Team outcome efficacy was the strongest predictor of objective team performance, whereas team process efficacy was the best predictor of citizenship behaviours. Team potency predicted both outcomes, albeit more weakly. Collectively, the findings show the value of a more fine-grained approach to teams' capability beliefs, including a new validated measure of team process efficacy.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  Leann J. Mischel,et al.  "I think we can, I think we can...": The role of efficacy beliefs in group and team effectiveness. , 1997 .

[3]  E. A. Locke,et al.  The Relation of Self-Efficacy and Grade Goals to Academic Performance , 1987 .

[4]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[5]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Efficacy-Performing Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective , 1995 .

[6]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Quantity and Quality of Work Group Performance , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[8]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Group Potency and Collective Efficacy , 2003 .

[9]  Bryan D. Edwards,et al.  A Longitudinal Examination of the Comparative Criterion-Related Validity of Additive and Referent-Shift Consensus Operationalizations of Team Efficacy , 2007 .

[10]  S. Parker,et al.  Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Conflict values and team relationships : conflict's contribution to team effectiveness and citizenship in China , 2003 .

[12]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[13]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[14]  R. Low,et al.  Toward a hierarchical, multidimensional English self-concept. , 1999 .

[15]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1996 .

[16]  Paul R. Yost,et al.  Potency in groups: articulating a construct. , 1993, The British journal of social psychology.

[17]  R. Motl,et al.  Factorial invariance and latent mean structure of questionnaires measuring social-cognitive determinants of physical activity among black and white adolescent girls. , 2002, Preventive medicine.

[18]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Creating a Strategic Human Resources Organization: An Assessment of Trends and New Directions , 2003 .

[19]  Gary R. Pike,et al.  Using structural equation models with latent variables to study student growth and development , 1991 .

[20]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[21]  George P. Baker,et al.  Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .

[22]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR CONDUCTING MULTI-LEVEL CONSTRUCT VALIDATION , 2005 .

[23]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. , 1979 .

[24]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? , 2001 .

[25]  Mark A. Griffin,et al.  Identifying Group Task Satisfaction at Work , 2003 .

[26]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[27]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the Workplace. , 2007 .

[28]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[29]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[30]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  A. Pescosolido,et al.  Group Efficacy And Group Effectiveness , 2003 .

[32]  Mark G Ehrhart,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: a group norms approach. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  J. W. Johnson.  A Heuristic Method for Estimating the Relative Weight of Predictor Variables in Multiple Regression , 2000, Multivariate behavioral research.

[34]  D. Feltz,et al.  Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  Stephanie C. Payne,et al.  Simultaneous Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Efficacy Beliefs at Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2002 .

[36]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[37]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications , 1988 .

[38]  Mark A. Mone.  Comparative Validity of Two Measures of Self-Efficacy in Predicting Academic Goals and Performance , 1994 .

[39]  Philip Bobko,et al.  An Investigation of the Antecedents and Consequences of Group‐Level Confidence1 , 2002 .

[40]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. , 1984 .

[41]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[42]  B. Fredrickson.  The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[43]  Amy E. Randel,et al.  Understanding Group Efficacy , 2000 .

[44]  Timothy R. Hinkin,et al.  A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[45]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  David Chan,et al.  The Conceptualization and Analysis of Change Over Time: An Integrative Approach Incorporating Longitudinal Mean and Covariance Structures Analysis (LMACS) and Multiple Indicator Latent Growth Modeling (MLGM) , 1998 .

[47]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups , 2002 .

[48]  B. Byrne.  The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Validating Factorial Structure and Invariance Across Intermediate, Secondary, and University Educators. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[49]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[50]  K. A. Dutton,et al.  Global Self-Esteem and Specific Self-Views as Determinants of People's Reactions to Success and Failure , 1997 .

[51]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, EFFICACY, AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS , 2000 .

[52]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[53]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[54]  Robert T. Golembiewski,et al.  Measuring Change and Persistence in Human Affairs: Types of Change Generated by OD Designs , 1976 .

[55]  A. Bandura.  GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES , 2006 .

[56]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. , 1995 .

[57]  S G Trost,et al.  Factorial validity and invariance of questionnaires measuring social-cognitive determinants of physical activity among adolescent girls. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[58]  Jean M. Bartunek,et al.  The Effects of Organizational Restructuring on Frames of Reference and Cooperation , 1988 .

[59]  G. Seijts,et al.  The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.