Foot‐and‐mouth disease in the UK: What should we do next time?

Mathematical models were used to guide the UK foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) control policy during the 2001 epidemic. Based on data collected during the epidemic, prospective modelling using a variety of approaches gave the same conclusions: (i) that the epidemic had not been brought under control by 'traditional' methods, and (ii) that neighbourhood control measures (the contiguous cull) could bring the epidemic under control and result in a net saving of livestock. Retrospective analyses suggest that the subsequent course of the epidemic was consistent with a beneficial impact of the contiguous cull and that it would have been difficult to achieve a better outcome using reactive vaccination, which would have required very large-scale vaccination programmes to have been implemented quickly. Perhaps the most important lesson to be learned is the vital importance of rapid and decisive intervention in response to an outbreak, including the earliest possible implementation of a national ban on the movement of livestock once the presence of disease is confirmed.

[1]  T Mikkelsen,et al.  Relative risks of the uncontrollable (airborne) spread of FMD by different species , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[2]  J. H. Sørensen,et al.  An integrated model to predict the atmospheric spread of foot-and-mouth disease virus , 2000, Epidemiology and Infection.

[3]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  The Foot-and-Mouth Epidemic in Great Britain: Pattern of Spread and Impact of Interventions , 2001, Science.

[4]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain , 2001, Nature.

[5]  S. Cornell,et al.  Dynamics of the 2001 UK Foot and Mouth Epidemic: Stochastic Dispersal in a Heterogeneous Landscape , 2001, Science.

[6]  R. May,et al.  Modelling vaccination strategies against foot-and-mouth disease , 2003, Nature.

[7]  R. Kitching,et al.  Failure of vaccination to prevent outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease , 1996, Epidemiology and Infection.

[8]  M. Keeling,et al.  Epidemiology: Foot-and-mouth disease under control in the UK , 2001, Nature.

[9]  R. Kitching,et al.  The use of vector transition in the modelling of intraherd foot-and-mouth disease , 1996, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[10]  J. W. Wilesmith,et al.  Predictive spatial modelling of alternative control strategies for the foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain, 2001 , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[11]  H. Carabin,et al.  A review of emergency foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines. , 2002, Vaccine.

[12]  J. W. Wilesmith,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[13]  L. Matthews,et al.  The construction and analysis of epidemic trees with reference to the 2001 UK foot–and–mouth outbreak , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. W. Wilesmith,et al.  Predictive spatial modelling of alternative control strategies for the foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain, 2001 , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[15]  M E Woolhouse,et al.  An analysis of foot-and-mouth-disease epidemics in the UK. , 1997, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[16]  C. Donnelly,et al.  The importance of immediate destruction in epidemics of foot and mouth disease. , 2000, Research in veterinary science.

[17]  Juan R. Granja,et al.  correction: Antibacterial agents based on the cyclic d,l-α-peptide architecture , 2001, Nature.