When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities

Individuals experience solo status when they are the only members of their social category (e.g., gender or race) present in an otherwise homogenous group. Field studies and surveys indicate that members of socially disadvantaged groups, such as women and racial minorities, have more negative experiences as solos than do members of privileged groups, such as Whites and males (Kanter, 1977; Niemann & Dovidio, 1998). In this article, we review research showing that the public performance of women and African-Americans is more debilitated by solo status than that of Whites and males. We also show that this effect is exacerbated when negative stereotypes about the performer’s social group seem relevant to their performance, and we discuss the contributing roles of lowered performance expectancies and feelings of group representativeness. We discuss how findings from social psychological research can be applied towards the goal of reducing the decrements typically associated with being the only member, or one of few members, of one’s race and/or gender in the environment. Diversification efforts have resulted in increasing representation of women and racial minorities in higher education and upper-level positions that have traditionally been dominated by White males (e.g., Eccles, 1987; Farley, 1984; Freeman, 1978). Yet several studies have indicated that members of socially

[1]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion. , 1987 .

[2]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males , 2000, Psychological science.

[3]  J. Yoder,et al.  Making Leadership Work More Effectively for Women , 2001 .

[4]  R. Farley,et al.  Blacks and Whites: Narrowing the Gap? , 1986 .

[5]  E. Aronson,et al.  Jigsaw Groups and the Desegregated Classroom: In Pursuit of Common Goals , 1979 .

[6]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  The Differential Impact of Gender Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations , 1995 .

[7]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Racial, Ethnic, and Cultural Differences in Responding to Distinctiveness and Discrimination on Campus: Stigma and Common Group Identity , 2001 .

[8]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings. , 1991 .

[9]  K. Pollak,et al.  Black and White Tokens in Academia: A Difference of Chronic Versus Acute Distinctiveness1 , 1998 .

[10]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[12]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[13]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[14]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  What's Good for the Goose Is Not Good for the Gander , 1984 .

[15]  Elizabeth G. Cohen,et al.  Can Classrooms Learn , 1989 .

[16]  Walter G. Daniel,et al.  Toward Black Undergraduate Student Equality in American Higher Education. , 1988 .

[17]  Delia S. Saenz,et al.  Memory deficits and memory surfeits: differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  P. Kollock,et al.  Sex and Power in Interaction: Conversational Privileges and Duties , 1985 .

[19]  Richard T. Herschel,et al.  The Impact of Varying Gender Composition on Group Brainstorming Performance in a GSS Environment , 1994 .

[20]  R. Spears,et al.  Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups , 2001 .

[21]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Gender, Language, and Influence , 2022 .

[22]  B. Daily,et al.  The influence of group decision support systems on contribution and commitment levels in multicultural and culturally homogeneous decision-making groups , 1998 .

[23]  Florence Geis,et al.  Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. , 1990 .

[24]  S. Spencer,et al.  The Interference of Stereotype Threat With Women's Generation of Mathematical Problem-Solving Strategies , 2001 .

[25]  Ann M. Morrison,et al.  Women and minorities in management. , 1990 .

[26]  F. Geis,et al.  Turning lead into gold: Evaluations of men and women leaders and the alchemy of social consensus. , 1984 .

[27]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  C. Laar.  The paradox of low academic achievement but high self-esteem in African American students: An attributional account. , 2000 .

[29]  Denise Sekaquaptewa,et al.  Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance , 2003 .

[30]  E. Heikes.  WHEN MEN ARE THE MINORITY: The Case of Men in Nursing , 1991 .

[31]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Understanding Women's Educational And Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices , 1994 .

[32]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social processes and group decision making: anonymity in group decision support systems , 2000, Ergonomics.

[33]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  The Effects of Gender Composition in Academic Departments on Faculty Turnover , 1995 .

[34]  K. Craig,et al.  Do Solo Arrangements Lead to Attributions of Tokenism? Perceptions of Selection Criteria and Task Assignments to Race and Gender Solos1 , 1998 .

[35]  C. Stangor,et al.  Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations , 1998 .

[36]  M. Heilman,et al.  Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins.. , 1991 .

[37]  R. Lakoff.  Language and woman's place , 1973, Language in Society.

[38]  Alexander M. Mood,et al.  Equality of Educational Opportunity. , 1967 .

[39]  J. Eccles.  Gender Roles and Women's Achievement-Related Decisions , 1987 .

[40]  C. Carver,et al.  Reassertion and giving up: The interactive role of self-directed attention and outcome expectancy. , 1979 .

[41]  Sandra Graham,et al.  Motivation in African Americans , 1994 .

[42]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model , 2000 .

[43]  Denise Sekaquaptewa,et al.  The Differential Effects of Solo Status on Members of High- and Low-Status Groups , 2002 .

[44]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  That swimsuit becomes you: sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. , 1978 .

[46]  L. Miller,et al.  An American Imperative: Accelerating Minority Educational Advancement , 1995 .

[47]  J. Yoder,et al.  Is it All in the Numbers?: A Case Study of Tokenism , 1985 .

[48]  Reversing roles: a cognitive strategy for undoing memory deficits associated with token status. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  C. Stangor,et al.  Prejudice : the target's perspective , 1999 .

[50]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. , 1998 .

[51]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethnic minorities , 1998 .

[52]  A. Mood,et al.  Equality of Educational Opportunity. , 1967 .

[53]  T. Schleicher,et al.  Empowering Token Women Leaders , 1998 .

[54]  E. Lenney,et al.  Women's self-confidence in achievement settings. , 1977 .