Wholesale power trading through concurrent multiple-issue negotiation

The electricity trade is expensive, and requires substantial expertise and efficient co-ordination methodologies. Several trading mechanisms including auctions have been adopted in the current energy market. To pursue success in this market, we present a protocol to support many-to-many bilateral multiple-issue negotiation in a competitive market where one or more self-interested electricity sellers can provide electricity to one or more buyers while buyers can choose the preferred sellers. Negotiation is a technique for reaching mutually beneficial agreement among autonomous entities. A concurrent negotiation problem occurs when one entity needs to negotiate simultaneously with several other entities to reach agreement. In the context of wholesale electricity trading, our described protocol enables both electricity buyers and sellers to manage several negotiation processes in parallel. This protocol allows the negotiating participants to make durable commitments to reduce the occurrence of the decommitment situation. Since coloured Petri nets are intuitive and can represent concurrency graphically, we use them to represent our negotiation protocol and facilitate our analysis of desirable properties.

[1]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Issues in Automated Negotiation and Electronic Commerce: Extending the Contract Net Framework , 1997, ICMAS.

[2]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[3]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Intelligent Agents for Automated One-to-Many E-Commerce Negotiation , 2002, ACSC.

[4]  Timothy D. Mount,et al.  Market power and price volatility in restructured markets for electricity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[5]  Jim Gray,et al.  Notes on Data Base Operating Systems , 1978, Advanced Course: Operating Systems.

[6]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Optimal negotiation of multiple issues in incomplete information settings , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[7]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Developing Agent Interaction Protocols Using Graphical and Logical Methodologies , 2003, PROMAS.

[8]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Reasoning about commitments in multiple concurrent negotiations , 2004, ICEC '04.

[9]  Tim Finin,et al.  Negotiating agents for supply chain management , 1999, AAAI 1999.

[10]  Timothy D. Mount Market power and price volatility in restructured markets for electricity , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Michael N. Huhns,et al.  Concurrent Multiple-Issue Negotiation for Internet-Based Services , 2006, IEEE Internet Computing.

[12]  Yun Peng,et al.  Using Colored Petri Nets for Conversation Modeling , 2000, Issues in Agent Communication.

[13]  Eduardo Alonso Fernández,et al.  Rules of encounter: designing conventions for automated negotiation among computers , 1995 .

[14]  Tadao Murata,et al.  Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[15]  Kenwood H. Hall,et al.  Cost-based dynamic reconfiguration system for intelligent agent negotiation , 2003, IEEE/WIC International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2003. IAT 2003..

[16]  W.M.P. van der Aalst,et al.  Interorganizational workflows: An approach based on message sequence charts and petri nets , 1999 .

[17]  Samir Aknine,et al.  An Extended Multi-Agent Negotiation Protocol , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.