Smart irrigation controllers are capable of substantially decreasing landscape water applications under residential highwater-use conditions in Florida. Their implementation has been incentivized by governmental agencies and water utilities in an effort to reduce public-supply water demand and conserve water resources. However, the bulk of the research on smart controllers for urban landscapes has focused on performance dimensions. To successfully promote them, feedback from end-users is critical. This paper provides an evaluation of homeowner response to evapotranspiration (ET)-based and soil moisture sensor (SMS)-based smart controllers installed as part of a pilot project conducted in Orange County, FL. The objectives of the study were to collect demographic information, assess conservation attitudes and irrigation system knowledge, and gather feedback on the use of smart controllers from the pilot project’s residential cooperators. Data were collected through an online survey and analyzed using relative frequency distributions, text analysis, independent means t tests, and logistic regression. Results indicated that a majority of survey participants were satisfied with their controllers and planned to continue using them. Both ET and SMS controllers were consistently praised for saving money and irrigating efficiently. However, the likelihood that participants would continue using their controllers after the completion of the project was only significantly predicted by their levels of technical knowledge regarding the workings of the devices and whether they had experienced any challenges operating them. Efforts to promote both initial and long-term adoptionmay bemost effective by emphasizing the economic benefits of investing in smart irrigation controllers and by disseminating best management practices that facilitate their understanding and successful operation.
[1]
Bruce J. Lesikar,et al.
Efficient Water Use in Residential Urban Landscapes
,
2008
.
[2]
R. Marella.
Water withdrawals, use, and trends in Florida, 2010
,
2014
.
[3]
Nancy L. Barber,et al.
Estimated use of water in the United States in 2010
,
2014
.
[4]
Nancy L. Barber,et al.
Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005
,
2009
.
[5]
Smart Irrigation Controllers: How Do Soil Moisture Sensor (SMS) Irrigation Controllers Work?
,
2009,
EDIS.
[6]
Michael D. Dukes,et al.
Water Conservation Potential of Landscape Irrigation Smart Controllers
,
2012
.
[7]
Melissa B. Haley,et al.
Residential Irrigation Water Use in Central Florida
,
2007
.
[8]
Residential Landscapes, Homeowner Attitudes, and Water-wise Choices in New Mexico
,
2006
.
[9]
Peter W. Mayer,et al.
Improving urban irrigation efficiency by using weather‐based “smart” controllers
,
2010
.
[10]
Michael D. Dukes,et al.
Soil Moisture Sensor Landscape Irrigation Controllers: A Review of Multi-Study Results and Future Implications
,
2012
.