The Cologne rebubbling study: a reappraisal of 624 rebubblings after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Background/Aims To analyse graft detachments prior to rebubbling, the influence of rebubbling on the postoperative outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and the need for rebubbling on the contralateral eye. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, out of 1541 DMEKs, optical coherence tomography scans and clinical records of 499 eyes undergoing rebubbling after DMEK at the University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, were examined. Main Outcome measures were (a) number, localisation and size of graft detachments; (b) influence of rebubbling/s on postoperative outcome after 12 months; and (c) rebubbling risk of the contralateral eye after DMEK. Results Mean number of detachment areas was 2.02±0.9. Mean lateral diameter of all detachments was 4534.76±1920.83 μm. Mean axial diameter was 382.53±282.02 μm. Detachments were equally distributed over all regions of the cornea. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity ( BSCVA) after 12 months was 0.197±0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, endothelial cell density (ECD) was 1575.21±397.71 cells/mm2 and mean central corneal thickness (CCT) was 566.37±68.11 μm. BSCVA, CCT, ECD or endothelial cell loss of all rebubbled patients were not influenced by the number of rebubblings or the time between DMEK and rebubbling. Of the rebubbled patients, which received a DMEK subsequently on the other eye, 193 (58.8%) also received a rebubbling, which was significantly higher, when compared to the overall rebubbling rate of 32.3% (p=0.000). Conclusions The overall number of rebubblings has no influence on the postoperative outcome after DMEK, if a rebubbling becomes necessary. Patients who received a rebubbling on one eye have an elevated risk for a rebubbling on the fellow eye.

[1]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Jing Hong,et al.  Risk Factors for Endothelial Decompensation after Penetrating Keratoplasty and Its Novel Therapeutic Strategies , 2018, Journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Graft Detachment Pattern After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Comparing Air Versus 20% SF6 Tamponade , 2018, Cornea.

[4]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Evolution of Consecutive Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes Throughout a 5-Year Period Performed by Two Experienced Surgeons. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Factors Associated With Early Graft Detachment in Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma.

[6]  W. Sekundo,et al.  Comparison of 5% Sulfur Hexafluoride Versus 100% Air Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[7]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Incidence and Clinical Course of Immune Reactions after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Retrospective Analysis of 1000 Consecutive Eyes. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[8]  P. Enders,et al.  One-year outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) 20% versus 100% air for anterior chamber tamponade , 2016, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[9]  Sebastian Siebelmann,et al.  Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT , 2016, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Güell,et al.  Comparison of Sulfur Hexafluoride 20% versus Air Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[11]  Z. M. Mayko,et al.  Standardized DMEK Technique: Reducing Complications Using Prestripped Tissue, Novel Glass Injector, and Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Gas , 2015, Cornea.

[12]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  Clinical and Ultrastructural Characteristics of Graft Failure in DMEK: 1-Year Results After Repeat DMEK , 2015, Cornea.

[13]  P. Steven,et al.  Spontaneous long-term course of persistent peripheral graft detachments after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  U. Pleyer,et al.  Clinicopathology of graft detachment after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, Acta ophthalmologica.

[15]  F. Price,et al.  Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Five‐year follow‐up , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  F. Kruse,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Terry Endothelial keratoplasty: why aren't we all doing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty? , 2012, Cornea.

[18]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Efficacy of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcome of 200 consecutive cases after a learning curve of 25 cases. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Patterns of corneal endothelialization and corneal clearance after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for fuchs endothelial dystrophy. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  A Stepwise Approach to Donor Preparation and Insertion Increases Safety and Outcome of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[21]  Claus Cursiefen,et al.  A method to confirm correct orientation of descemet membrane during descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  F. Kruse,et al.  DMEK: posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastiktechnik , 2010, Der Ophthalmologe.

[23]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[24]  F. Price,et al.  Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[25]  N. Mukaida,et al.  Alkali-Induced Corneal Neovascularization Is Independent of CXCR2-Mediated Neutrophil Infiltration , 2006, Cornea.