Assessment of mass transfer and hydraulic aspects of CO2 absorption in packed columns

Abstract The paper evaluates, using modeling and simulation techniques, CO 2 capture process from flue gases produced by power generation sector (post-combustion capture) in aqueous solution of mono-ethanolamine (MEA). The aim of the present article is to validate the absorber model as well as to understand the dynamic behavior of CO 2 absorption process. The mathematical model of carbon dioxide absorption includes differential equations, e.g. mass and heat transfer models to study the coupled effect of temperature and concentration on the absorption rate, reaction kinetics, vapor–liquid equilibrium (VLE), hydrodynamic aspects, etc. Determinant parts of the absorption model are the effective interfacial area, the mass transfer coefficient, pressure drop and liquid hold-up models. The simulation results have shown that the column operating conditions highly influence the accuracy of the absorber model and the importance of the mass transfer and hydraulic model selection for minimize the deviation of the model results from experimental data value. The present absorber model can be applied to study column operability during dynamic operation.

[1]  James R. Fair,et al.  Distillation columns containing structured packings: a comprehensive model for their performance. 1. Hydraulic models , 1993 .

[2]  Axel Meisen,et al.  Kinetics of carbon dioxide absorption and desorption in aqueous alkanolamine solutions using a novel hemispherical contactor—I. Experimental apparatus and mathematical modeling , 2006 .

[3]  Ľudovít Jelemenský,et al.  Impact of mass transfer coefficient correlations on prediction of reactive distillation column behaviour , 2008 .

[4]  Graeme Puxty,et al.  Rate based modeling and validation of a carbon-dioxide pilot plant absorbtion column operating on monoethanolamine , 2011 .

[5]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Comparison of solvents for post-combustion capture of CO2 by chemical absorption , 2009 .

[6]  G. Froment,et al.  Rigorous simulation and design of columns for gas absorption and chemical reaction—I: Packed columns , 1986 .

[7]  Timothy E. Fout,et al.  Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program ☆ , 2008 .

[8]  H. M. Kvamsdal,et al.  Dynamic modeling and simulation of a CO2 absorber column for post-combustion CO2 capture , 2009 .

[9]  Moetaz I. Attalla,et al.  Simulation of Enthalpy and Capacity of CO2 Absorption by Aqueous Amine Systems , 2008 .

[10]  R. M. Wellek,et al.  Enhancement factors for gas‐absorption with second‐order irreversible chemical reaction , 1978 .

[11]  Evaluation of CO2 absorption-desorption cycle by dynamic modeling and simulation , 2011 .

[12]  Hallvard F. Svendsen,et al.  Solvent selection for carbon dioxide absorption , 2009 .

[13]  R. Billet,et al.  Prediction of Mass Transfer Columns with Dumped and Arranged Packings , 1999 .

[14]  C. Cormos.  Assessment of hydrogen and electricity co-production schemes based on gasification process with carbon capture and storage , 2009 .

[15]  E. S. Hamborg,et al.  Absorption and desorption mass transfer rates in non-reactive systems , 2010 .

[16]  Bert Metz,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage , 2005 .

[17]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Rate-based modeling of reactive absorption of CO2 and H2S into aqueous methyldiethanolamine , 1998 .

[18]  Calin-Cristian Cormos,et al.  Multicriterial analysis of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture using alkanolamines , 2011 .

[19]  L. Spiegel,et al.  Hold-up of mellapak structured packings , 1992 .

[20]  Ana-Maria Cormos,et al.  Dynamic modeling and validation of absorber and desorber columns for post-combustion CO2 capture , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[21]  Geert Versteeg,et al.  ON THE KINETICS BETWEEN CO2 AND ALKANOLAMINES BOTH IN AQUEOUS AND NON-AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS. AN OVERVIEW , 1996 .

[22]  A. R. Özdural,et al.  Carbon dioxide–air mixtures: mass transfer in recycling packed-bed absorption columns operating under high liquid flow rates , 1999 .

[23]  Manuel Laso,et al.  Effective Mass-Transfer Area in a Pilot Plant Column Equipped with Structured Packings and with Ceramic Rings , 1994 .

[24]  James R. Fair,et al.  Distillation Columns Containing Structured Packings: A Comprehensive Model for Their Performance. 2. Mass-Transfer Model , 1996 .

[25]  Estrella Alvarez,et al.  Effect of bubble contamination on gas–liquid mass transfer coefficient on CO2 absorption in amine solutions , 2008 .

[26]  A. Mersmann,et al.  Effective interfacial area in packed columns , 1985 .

[27]  Finn Andrew Tobiesen,et al.  Experimental validation of a rigorous absorber model for CO2 postcombustion capture , 2007 .

[28]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[29]  Thomas K. Sherwood,et al.  Flooding Velocities in Packed Columns , 1938 .

[30]  L. Valenz,et al.  Methods standardization in the measurement of mass-transfer characteristics in packed absorption columns , 2009 .

[31]  J. Plaza,et al.  Modeling CO2 capture with aqueous monoethanolamine , 2003 .

[32]  G. Q. Wang,et al.  A method for calculating effective interfacial area of structured packed distillation columns under elevated pressures , 2006 .

[33]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Dynamic modelling of CO2 absorption for post combustion capture in coal-fired power plants , 2009 .

[34]  J. Pandya,et al.  ADIABATIC GAS ABSORPTION AND STRIPPING WITH CHEMICAL REACTION IN PACKED TOWERS , 1983 .

[35]  Estrella Alvarez,et al.  Effect of temperature on carbon dioxide absorption in monoethanolamine solutions , 2008 .

[36]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .