Successful use of “Hour 1” transfer of sperm microinjected oocytes in natural cycles of poor responder women: a prospective randomized controlled pilot study

Abstract The aim of the study is to demonstrate the successful use of “Hour 1” transfer of sperm microinjected oocytes in natural cycles of poor responder women. Seventy women were selected from 92 consecutive poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) in a natural cycle at our Sterility and Assisted Reproduction Unit from September 2009 to July 2013, and randomly distributed in two homogeneous groups: Group A or B. Women in Group A (35) underwent transfer within 1 h after ICSI; Group B (35, control group) underwent transfer 3 days after ICSI. In Group A, seven clinical pregnancy and one miscarriage occurred; in Group B, eight clinical pregnancies and two miscarriages were observed. Pregnancy, miscarriage, term pregnancy and overall live birth rates’ difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Difference between the two groups in terms of timing, type of delivery and newborn birthweight was not observed. Neither ectopic pregnancy nor multiple pregnancies occurred. “Hour 1” uterine transfer of ICSI oocytes, still to be considered with caution because of the relatively low number of observations of the pilot study, deserves further attention on a larger scale, and might be evaluated for clinical and financial effectiveness in other clinical settings.

[1]  C. Aragona,et al.  Term pregnancy and live birth subsequent to immediate uterine transfer of sperm microinjected oocyte in a natural cycle , 2015, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[2]  O. Sellam,et al.  Delivery rates after elective single cryopreserved embryo transfer related to embryo survival. , 2015, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[3]  F. Pulcinelli,et al.  Poor responders in IVF: an update in therapy , 2015, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[4]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  To ICSI or Not to ICSI , 2015, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine.

[5]  W. Martins,et al.  Ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  J. Grifo,et al.  A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 and day 5/6 embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer really make a difference? , 2015, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[7]  E. Baştu,et al.  Evaluation of embryo transfer time (day 2 vs day 3) after imposed single embryo transfer legislation: When to transfer? , 2013, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[8]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. , 2011, Human reproduction.

[9]  E. Sullivan,et al.  Better perinatal outcomes following transfer of fresh blastocysts and blastocysts cultured from thawed cleavage embryos: a population-based study. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[10]  Organización Mundial de la Salud WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen , 2010 .

[11]  J. Auger,et al.  WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen , 2010 .

[12]  M. Sbracia,et al.  Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients: a survey of 500 consecutive cycles. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  K. Pantos,et al.  Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  C. Aragona,et al.  A controlled trial of natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog flare cycles in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  Nikica Zaninovic,et al.  An atlas of human blastocysts , 2003 .

[16]  P. Devroey,et al.  Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte , 1992, The Lancet.

[17]  S. Berga,et al.  Establishment of pregnancies in humans after transcervical transfer of gametes immediately after oocyte retrieval. , 1990, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  J. Schoemaker,et al.  Pregnancy following transcervical transfer of oocyte and sperm. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  A. Trounson,et al.  Morphology and fertilizability of frozen human oocytes. , 1987, Gamete research.

[20]  F. McLeod,et al.  HUMAN PREGNANCY FOLLOWING OOCYTE AND SPERM TRANSFER TO THE UTERUS , 1982, The Lancet.

[21]  C. E. Adams Consequences of accelerated ovum transport, including a re-evaluation of Estes' operation. , 1979, Journal of reproduction and fertility.