Design patterns for promoting peer interaction in discussion forums in MOOCs

Design patterns are a way of sharing evidence-based solutions to educational design problems. The design patterns presented in this paper were produced through a series of workshops, which aimed to identify Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) design principles from workshop participants’ experiences of designing, teaching and learning on these courses. MOOCs present a challenge for the existing pedagogy of online learning, particularly as it relates to promoting peer interaction and discussion. MOOC cohort sizes, participation patterns and diversity of learners mean that discussions can remain superficial, become difficult to navigate, or never develop beyond isolated posts. In addition, MOOC platforms may not provide sufficient tools to support moderation. This paper draws on four case studies of designing and teaching on a range of MOOCs presenting seven design narratives relating to the experience in these MOOCs. Evidence presented in the narratives is abstracted in the form of three design patterns created through a collaborative process using techniques similar to those used in collective autoethnography. The patterns: “Special Interest Discussions”, “Celebrity Touch” and “Look and Engage”, draw together shared lessons and present possible solutions to the problem of creating, managing and facilitating meaningful discussion in MOOCs through the careful use of staged learning activities and facilitation strategies.

[1]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  Practical Design Patterns for Teaching and Learning with Technology , 2014 .

[2]  David Spencer CONSTRUCTIVISM THROUGH SOCIAL PRESENCE AND SWIFT TRUST: FACILITATION AND COLLABORATION WITHIN ONLINE LEARNING NETWORKS , 2001 .

[3]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  Communication patterns in massively open online courses , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-tivities: the key to active online learning, 2nd ed. , 2002 .

[5]  Tharindu Rekha Liyanagunawardena,et al.  Who are with us: MOOC learners on a FutureLearn course , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  Donna Smith,et al.  Case for ‘Passive’ Learning – the ‘Silent’ Community of Online Learners , 2014 .

[7]  Chris Piech,et al.  Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses , 2013, LAK '13.

[8]  Min-Yen Kan,et al.  Learning Instructor Intervention from MOOC Forums: Early Results and Issues , 2015, EDM.

[9]  Yishay Mor,et al.  SNaP! Re-using, sharing and communicating designs and design knowledge using scenarios, narratives and patterns , 2013 .

[10]  N. Winters,et al.  Participatory pattern workshops: a methodology for open learning design inquiry , 2012 .

[11]  Jennifer A. Scarduzio,et al.  The Light and Shadow of Feminist Research Mentorship: A Collaborative Autoethnography of Faculty-Student Research , 2013 .

[12]  Murray Silverstein,et al.  A Pattern Language , 1977 .

[13]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  A N A TTRACTION –S ELECTION –A TTRITION T HEORY OF O NLINE C OMMUNITY S IZE AND R ESILIENCE 1 , 2014 .

[14]  C. Haythornthwaite Social networks and online community , 2009 .

[15]  Renée Houston,et al.  Exemplifying Collaborative Autoethnographic Practice via Shared Stories of Mothering , 2010 .

[16]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[17]  Michael Derntl,et al.  Essential use cases for pedagogical patterns , 2006, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[18]  A. P. Rovai Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Teaching as a Design Science , 2012 .

[20]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Joseph Jay Williams,et al.  HarvardX and MITx: Two Years of Open Online Courses Fall 2012-Summer 2014 , 2015 .

[22]  C. Coffin,et al.  Patterns of debate in tertiary level asynchronous text-based conferencing , 2005 .

[23]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Innovative Pedagogy at Massive Scale: Teaching and Learning in MOOCs , 2014, EC-TEL.

[24]  Patrick Parslow,et al.  Dropout: MOOC participants’perspective , 2014 .

[25]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs) , 2015, LAK.

[26]  Yoav Bergner,et al.  Who does what in a massive open online course? , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[27]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[28]  Benjamin Kehrwald,et al.  Being Online: Social Presence as Subjectivity in Online Learning. , 2010 .