Functional movement screen normative values in a young, active population.

BACKGROUND The Functional Movement Screen(TM) (FMS(TM)) is a screening instrument which evaluates selective fundamental movement patterns to determine potential injury risk. However, despite its global use, there are currently no normative values available for the FMS(TM). OBJECTIVES To establish normative values for the FMS(TM) in a population of active, healthy individuals. Secondary aims were to investigate whether performance differed between males and females, between those with and without a previous history of injury, and to establish real-time inter-rater reliability of the FMS(TM). METHODS Two hundred and nine (108 females and 101 males) physically active individuals, aged between 18 and 40 years, with no recent (<6 weeks) history of musculoskeletal injury were recruited. All participants performed the FMS(TM) and were scored using the previously established standardized FMS(TM) criteria. A representative sub-group participant sample (28%) determined inter rater reliability. RESULTS The mean composite FMS(TM) score was 15.7 with a 95% confidence interval between 15.4 and 15.9 out of a possible total of 21. There was no statistically significant difference in scores between females and males (t(207) = .979, p = .329), or those who reported a previous injury and those who did not (t(207) = .688, p= .492). Inter-rater reliability (ICC(3,1)) for the composite FMS(TM) score was .971, demonstrating excellent reliability. Inter-rater reliability (Kappa) for individual test components of the FMS(TM) demonstrated substantial to excellent agreement (0.70 - 1.0). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION This cross-sectional study provides FMS(TM) reference values for young, active individuals, which will assist in the interpretation of individual scores when screening athletes for musculoskeletal injury and performance factors.

[1]  R. Butler,et al.  Functional movement test scores improve following a standardized off‐season intervention program in professional football players , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[2]  E. Joy,et al.  Optimizing the Collegiate Preparticipation Physical Evaluation , 2004, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[3]  T. Uhl,et al.  A kinetic chain approach for shoulder rehabilitation. , 2000, Journal of athletic training.

[4]  Paul McCrory,et al.  Preparticipation Assessment for Head Injury , 2004, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[5]  A. Bauman,et al.  Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. , 2007, Circulation.

[6]  E. Nalçaci,et al.  Aspects of foot preference: Differential relationships of skilled and unskilled foot movements with motor asymmetry , 2008, Laterality.

[7]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[8]  Lee Burton,et al.  Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. , 2006, North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT.

[9]  A. Schneiders,et al.  A Valid and Reliable Clinical Determination of Footedness , 2010, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[10]  Lee Burton,et al.  Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. , 2006, North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT.

[11]  Lee Burton,et al.  Interrater Reliability of the Functional Movement Screen , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[12]  P. Brukner,et al.  Screening of Athletes: Australian Experience , 2004, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[13]  W. Kibler,et al.  A musculoskeletal approach to the preparticipation physical examination , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  Eric A Roy,et al.  Using hand performance measures to predict handedness , 2006, Laterality.

[15]  A. Williams,et al.  Talent identification and development in soccer , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  Virginia S. Cowen Functional fitness improvements after a worksite-based yoga initiative. , 2010, Journal of bodywork and movement therapies.

[17]  Willem H. Meeuwisse,et al.  Preparticipation Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Review , 2004, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[18]  C. Wren Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: proposal for a common European protocol. , 2005, European heart journal.

[19]  Mark E Batt,et al.  Preparticipation Examination (Screening): Practical Issues as Determined by Sport: A United Kingdom Perspective , 2004, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[20]  WF Peate,et al.  Core strength: A new model for injury prediction and prevention , 2007, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (London, England).

[21]  Caroline F. Finch,et al.  Reliability of common lower extremity musculoskeletal screening tests , 2004 .

[22]  Phillip J Plisky,et al.  Can Serious Injury in Professional Football be Predicted by a Preseason Functional Movement Screen? , 2007, North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT.

[23]  Sarah Mottram,et al.  A new perspective on risk assessment. , 2008, Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine.