Research Portals: Status Quo and Improvement Perspectives

Research portals are a means to present, discuss, and advance scientific findings. They are web-based knowledge management tools for research communities. Research portals foster collaboration among a community of scientists, research funders, and political decision-makers. However, research communities might not possess the knowledge and experience required to design a research portal. The authors support them by analyzing the status quo of existing portals and providing respective improvement perspectives. The authors ask what typical characteristics of such portals are and how these characteristics can be used to evaluate the advancement of individual portals and they seek to distinguish classes of differently advanced research portals and determine their status quo. The authors' research is based on a systematic web search, during which the authors identify 813 relevant research portals. Following a multi-method approach, they assign each research portal a previously distinguished class of advancement. The authors conclude that research portals generally only offer basic functionality and discuss functionality that is underrepresented in this pool of analyzed research portals and elaborate on improvement perspectives in 11 feature dimensions.

[1]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visual representations in knowledge management: framework and cases , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process , 2009, ECIS.

[3]  Kai S. Koong,et al.  An identification and classification of enterprise portal functions and features , 2002, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  Bonnie Cheuk,et al.  Using Social Networking Analysis to Facilitate Knowledge Sharing in the British Council , 2006, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  Blake Ives,et al.  Knowledge management in academia: A proposed framework , 2000, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[6]  David Pascale,et al.  Developing a university research web-based knowledge portal , 2006, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[7]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[8]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[9]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Research, Teaching, and Publication Productivity: Mutuality Versus Competition in Academia. , 1992 .

[10]  Amy Nicole Langville,et al.  Google's PageRank and beyond - the science of search engine rankings , 2006 .

[11]  Karl Reiner Lang,et al.  Supporting Better Communication in Academic Communities of Practice: An Empirical Study of AIS/ISWORLD , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Nassim Belbaly,et al.  Corporate Portal: A Tool for Knowledge Management Synchronization , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[13]  Marjan Grootveld,et al.  A framework for evaluating knowledge-mapping tools , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  Roy Rada,et al.  Integrating Knowledge Sources: An Ontological Approach , 2013, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[15]  Andrzej P. Wierzbicki,et al.  Knowledge management and knowledge creation in academia: a study based on surveys in a Japanese research university , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[16]  Ans Kolk,et al.  The evolution of environmental management: from stage models to performance evaluation , 2002 .

[17]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Factors influencing knowledge productivity in German research groups: lessons for developing countries , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[19]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  Towards a Portal Maturity Model (PMM): Investigating Social and Technological Effects of Portals on Knowledge Management Initiatives , 2013 .

[20]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Towards a reference model for online research maps , 2009, ECIS.

[21]  John W. Lamp,et al.  The index of information systems journals , 2006 .

[22]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Developing Maturity Models for IT Management , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[24]  Tobias Mettler,et al.  Situational maturity models as instrumental artifacts for organizational design , 2009, DESRIST.

[25]  Amir Alexander,et al.  Two cultures: Essays in honour of David Speiser , 2008 .

[26]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  The Relevance of Integration for Knowledge Management Success: Conceptual and Empirical Findings , 2009 .

[27]  Mark W. S. Chun,et al.  Facilitating New Knowledge Creation and Obtaining KM Maturity , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[28]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[29]  Brigid Barron.  When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[30]  Jay Palmisano,et al.  Motivating Knowledge Contribution in Virtual Communities of Practice: Roots, Progress and Needs , 2009, AMCIS.

[31]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  The Evolation of the SEI's Capacity Maturity Model for Software , 1995, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[32]  Edmond F. Vail.  Knowledge Mapping: Getting Started with Knowledge Management , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[33]  Adam Fadlalla,et al.  The Knowledge Spectrum , 2012, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[34]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[35]  Mark N. Wexler,et al.  The who, what and why of knowledge mapping , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[36]  Robert Winter,et al.  Vernetzungsfähigkeit im Gesundheitswesen - Notwendigkeit, Bewertung und systematische Entwicklung als Voraussetzung zur Erhöhung der Wirtschaftlichkeit administrativer Prozesse , 2006, HMD Prax. Wirtsch..

[37]  Sébastien George,et al.  A Knowledge Management Tool for the Interconnection of Communities of Practice , 2011, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  Pablo Fernández,et al.  Google’s pagerank and beyond: The science of search engine rankings , 2008 .

[39]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding web site redesigns in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): a U.K.-based study on the applicability of e-commerce Stage Models , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Tobias Mettler,et al.  Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach , 2011 .

[41]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  A Model of Knowledge Management Success , 2006, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[42]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  Virtual Communities Practice: A Mechanism for Efficient Knowledge Retrieval in MNC's , 2008, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[43]  Wei Zhang.  Wonders Knowledge Portal , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Resarch: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions , 2002, MIS Q..

[45]  Davydd J. Greenwood,et al.  Are Research Universities Knowledge-Intensive Learning Organizations? , 2009 .

[46]  R. Daft,et al.  Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics , 2001 .

[47]  U. Schimank,et al.  ‘New Public Management’ and the Academic Profession: Reflections on the German Situation , 2005 .

[48]  M. Langen.  Holistic Development of Knowledge Management with KMMM (R) , 2002 .

[49]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[50]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Does research organization influence academic production?: Laboratory level evidence from a large European university , 2004 .

[51]  John M. Ward,et al.  Enterprise Portals: Addressing the Organisational and Individual Perspectives of Information Systems , 2005, ECIS.

[52]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model , 2005 .