Two-dimensional estimation of the electrohysterographic conduction velocity

Propagation of action potentials (APs) through an adequate number of uterine muscle cells induces contraction of the uterus. Monitoring uterine contractions, as the first sign of labor, can provide important information on the course of pregnancy and delivery. Unfortunately, current monitoring methods are affected by serious limitations. The electrohysterogram (EHG), which is the noninvasive recording of the APs propagating through the uterine smooth muscle cells, is here analyzed as a potential alternative to current methods. We focus on estimating the conduction velocity (CV) of surface APs extracted from an EHG recorded in a multielectrode configuration. In this work, a two-dimensional, 64-channel, high density electrode grid is used. Maximum likelihood methods are employed for analyzing the EHG AP propagation in two dimensions. The use of different weighting strategies of the derived cost function is introduced to deal with poor interchannel signal similarity. The presented methods were evaluated by specific simulations proving the best weighting strategy to lead to an accuracy improvement of 58%. EHG measurements on women with uterine contractions confirmed the feasibility of the method by leading to values of conduction velocity within the expected physiological range.

[1]  W. Lammers,et al.  Patterns of electrical propagation in the intact pregnant guinea pig uterus. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[2]  E E Daniel,et al.  Improved propagation in myometrium associated with gap junctions during parturition. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Statistical and Adaptive Signal Processing , 2000 .

[4]  R. Merletti,et al.  Methods for estimating muscle fibre conduction velocity from surface electromyographic signals , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[6]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Inter-electrode delay estimators for electrohysterographic propagation analysis , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[7]  I. W. Hunter,et al.  Estimation of the conduction velocity of muscle action potentials using phase and impulse response function techniques , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[8]  Jan W. M. Bergmans,et al.  Modeling and Identification of the Electrohysterographic Volume Conductor by High-Density Electrodes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Wim J. E. P. Lammers,et al.  Circulating excitations and re-entry in the pregnant uterus , 1996, Pflügers Archiv.

[10]  D. Farina,et al.  Estimation of single motor unit conduction velocity from surface electromyogram signals detected with linear electrode arrays , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[11]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[13]  R. N. Scott,et al.  Statistics of the myoelectric signal from monopolar and bipolar electrodes , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[14]  G. Saade,et al.  Methods and Devices for the Management of Term and Preterm Labor , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  P. A. Lynn,et al.  Direct On-Line Estimation of Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity by Surface Electromyography , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.