Semiautomated Multimodal Breast Image Registration

Consideration of information from multiple modalities has been shown to have increased diagnostic power in breast imaging. As a result, new techniques such as microwave imaging continue to be developed. Interpreting these novel image modalities is a challenge, requiring comparison to established techniques such as the gold standard X-ray mammography. However, due to the highly deformable nature of breast tissues, comparison of 3D and 2D modalities is a challenge. To enable this comparison, a registration technique was developed to map features from 2D mammograms to locations in the 3D image space. This technique was developed and tested using magnetic resonance (MR) images as a reference 3D modality, as MR breast imaging is an established technique in clinical practice. The algorithm was validated using a numerical phantom then successfully tested on twenty-four image pairs. Dice's coefficient was used to measure the external goodness of fit, resulting in an excellent overall average of 0.94. Internal agreement was evaluated by examining internal features in consultation with a radiologist, and subjective assessment concludes that reasonable alignment was achieved.

[1]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Michael Brady,et al.  Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  D. Hill,et al.  Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  X-ray Mammography - MRI Registration Using a Volume-Preserving Affine Transformation and an EM-MRF for Breast Tissue Classification , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[5]  The palpable breast lump: information and recommendations to assist decision-making when a breast lump is detected. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists. , 1998, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  D. Dowsett,et al.  Physics of diagnostic imaging , 1998 .

[7]  Robert Marti,et al.  TWO-DIMENSIONAL–THREE-DIMENSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE IN MAMMOGRAPHY , 2004, Cybern. Syst..

[8]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Khotanzad,et al.  A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3-D image matching , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Supun Samarasekera,et al.  Fuzzy Connectedness and Object Definition: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications in Image Segmentation , 1996, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[11]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  R. Steele,et al.  Optimization , 2005, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[13]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Model-based registration of X-ray mammograms and MR images of the female breast , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  E.C. Fear,et al.  Tissue sensing adaptive Radar for breast cancer detection-investigations of an improved skin-sensing method , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[15]  Radhika Sivaramakrishna,et al.  Breast image registration techniques: a survey , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.