Three-dimensional nonrigid landmark-based magnetic resonance to transrectal ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate biopsy

Abstract. Registration of three-dimensional (3-D) magnetic resonance (MR) to 3-D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate images is an important step in the planning and guidance of 3-D TRUS guided prostate biopsy. In order to accurately and efficiently perform the registration, a nonrigid landmark-based registration method is required to account for the different deformations of the prostate when using these two modalities. We describe a nonrigid landmark-based method for registration of 3-D TRUS to MR prostate images. The landmark-based registration method first makes use of an initial rigid registration of 3-D MR to 3-D TRUS images using six manually placed approximately corresponding landmarks in each image. Following manual initialization, the two prostate surfaces are segmented from 3-D MR and TRUS images and then nonrigidly registered using the following steps: (1) rotationally reslicing corresponding segmented prostate surfaces from both 3-D MR and TRUS images around a specified axis, (2) an approach to find point correspondences on the surfaces of the segmented surfaces, and (3) deformation of the surface of the prostate in the MR image to match the surface of the prostate in the 3-D TRUS image and the interior using a thin-plate spline algorithm. The registration accuracy was evaluated using 17 patient prostate MR and 3-D TRUS images by measuring the target registration error (TRE). Experimental results showed that the proposed method yielded an overall mean TRE of 3.50±1.34  mm for the rigid registration and 2.24±0.71  mm for the nonrigid registration, which is favorably comparable to a clinical requirement for an error of less than 2.5 mm. A landmark-based nonrigid 3-D MR-TRUS registration approach is proposed, which takes into account the correspondences on the prostate surface, inside the prostate, as well as the centroid of the prostate. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method yields clinically sufficient accuracy.

[1]  C. Roehrborn,et al.  Diagnostic yield of repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies stratified by specific histopathologic diagnoses and prostate specific antigen levels. , 1996, Urology.

[2]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Registered 3-D Ultrasound and Digital Stereotactic Mammography for Breast Biopsy Guidance , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Fusion of MRI to 3D TRUS for Mechanically-Assisted Targeted Prostate Biopsy: System Design and Initial Clinical Experience , 2011, Prostate Cancer Imaging.

[4]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Efficient Convex Optimization Approach to 3D Non-rigid MR-TRUS Registration , 2013, MICCAI.

[5]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Daniel O Scharfstein,et al.  Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Urology.

[7]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Spatial Transformation and Registration of Brain Images Using Elastically Deformable Models , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[8]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Prostate Segmentation: An Efficient Convex Optimization Approach With Axial Symmetry Using 3-D TRUS and MR Images , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[11]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Prostate boundary segmentation from 3D ultrasound images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[12]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[13]  D. Johnston,et al.  Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[14]  A. Fenster,et al.  Three-dimensional prostate segmentation using level set with shape constraint based on rotational slices for 3D end-firing TRUS guided biopsy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[15]  Gábor,et al.  A spline-based non-linear diffeomorphism for multimodal prostate registration , 2017 .

[16]  William M. Wells,et al.  Two solutions for registration of ultrasound to MRI for image-guided prostate interventions , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  Zeike A. Taylor,et al.  MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Thomas Wiegel,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. , 2011, European urology.

[19]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  3D non-rigid surface-based MR-TRUS registration for image-guided prostate biopsy , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[20]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[22]  M Bolla,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2001, European urology.

[23]  Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry,et al.  Prostate biopsies guided by three-dimensional real-time (4-D) transrectal ultrasonography on a phantom: comparative study versus two-dimensional transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies , 2007, European urology.

[24]  Peter Guion,et al.  Initial clinical experience with real‐time transrectal ultrasonography‐magnetic resonance imaging fusion‐guided prostate biopsy , 2008, BJU international.

[25]  F. Bookstein Thin-plate splines and decomposition of deformation , 1989 .

[26]  A. Fenster,et al.  2D-3D rigid registration to compensate for prostate motion during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[27]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Semi-automatic segmentation for prostate interventions , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2011 , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[29]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Development and validation of a virtual reality transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy simulator. , 2011, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[30]  J. Melamed,et al.  Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[31]  W. Catalona,et al.  Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[32]  S. Crouzet,et al.  Value of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting biopsy results in first or repeat biopsy. , 2014, Clinical radiology.

[33]  W. Ellis,et al.  Repeat prostate needle biopsy: who needs it? , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[34]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Sonography With Needle Tracking , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[35]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  MRI-ultrasound registration for targeted prostate biopsy , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[36]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[37]  A. Fenster,et al.  Assessment of image registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[38]  Matthew D. Rifkin,et al.  Ultrasound of the prostate , 1988 .

[39]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  An adaptive-focus statistical shape model for segmentation and shape modeling of 3-D brain structures , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Prostate boundary segmentation from ultrasound images using 2D active shape models: Optimisation and extension to 3D , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[41]  L. Holmberg,et al.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. , 1997, Urology.

[42]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[43]  A Fenster,et al.  Evaluation of intersession 3D-TRUS to 3D-TRUS image registration for repeat prostate biopsies. , 2011, Medical physics.

[44]  Florian Jung,et al.  Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: The PROMISE12 challenge , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[45]  T. Stamey,et al.  Zonal Distribution of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Histologic Pattern and Direction of Spread , 1988, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[46]  D. Kendall MORPHOMETRIC TOOLS FOR LANDMARK DATA: GEOMETRY AND BIOLOGY , 1994 .