Sex differences and data quality as determinants of income from hunting red deer Cervus elaphus

When hunting species in which the sexes differ substantially in value, sex-selective harvesting can increase income dramatically. In some hunted species, for example the red deer Cervus elaphus in Scotland, there are also marked ecological differences between the sexes. In red deer, stag mortality and dispersal rates are substantially higher when hind densities are high. Hence, there is a trade-off between having enough hinds to produce valuable stags, but keeping densities low enough to minimise losses from dispersal and stag mortality. We develop a model, parameterised for red deer on Rum, to explore these trade-offs. This stochastic, age and sex-structured model includes two neighbouring estates with differing harvesting policies. Due to stag dispersal, estates with low hunting levels act as sources of stags for neighbouring estates that harvest more heavily. The optimal harvesting strategy depends on the actions of neighbours, but keeps hinds below 50% of carrying capacity and imposes heavy hunting pressure on stags. Scottish deer estates aim to harvest fewer stags and more hinds than the model suggests as optimal, which could lead to substantially reduced incomes. We explore the reasons for this mismatch between predicted optimal behaviour and actual harvesting strategies by incorporating realistic levels of uncertainty, bias and infrequent population counts into our model. We show that the estates' harvesting strategies lead to approximately optimal hind harvesting, because hind numbers are generally underestimated in counts, whereas the uncertainty surrounding population sizes leads to a lower than optimal stag harvest. The most effective method of improving incomes is to increase count frequency. This modelling approach is broadly applicable, both for the management of hunted species under uncertainty and for spatially explicit conservation policies such as no-take areas.

[1]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The demographic consequences of releasing a population of red deer from culling , 2004 .

[2]  R. Lande,et al.  Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation , 2003 .

[3]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  Conservation: Reproductive collapse in saiga antelope harems , 2003, Nature.

[4]  J. Sévigny,et al.  Interannual variability of sperm reserves and fecundity of primiparous females of the snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) in relation to sex ratio , 2002 .

[5]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  The role of males in the dynamics of ungulate populations , 2002 .

[6]  Nils Chr. Stenseth,et al.  MANAGEMENT OF CHAMOIS (RUPICAPRA RUPICAPRA) MOVING BETWEEN A PROTECTED CORE AREA AND A HUNTING AREA , 2002 .

[7]  Jon Slate,et al.  ANTLER SIZE IN RED DEER: HERITABILITY AND SELECTION BUT NO EVOLUTION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  B. Sæther,et al.  Biased adult sex ratio can affect fecundity in primiparous moose Alces alces , 2002, Wildlife Biology.

[9]  Murdoch K. McAllister,et al.  Modelling the effects of establishing a marine reserve for mobile fish species , 2002 .

[10]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  Sex differences in emigration and mortality affect optimal management of deer populations , 2002, Nature.

[11]  G. Mace,et al.  Conservation of Exploited Species , 2001 .

[12]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Optimal and suboptimal use of compensatory responses to harvesting: timing of hunting as an example , 2001, Wildlife Biology.

[13]  B T Grenfell,et al.  Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. , 2001, Science.

[14]  V M Trenkel,et al.  Exploring red deer culling strategies using a population-specific calibrated management model. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Competing harvesting strategies in a simulated population under uncertainty , 2001 .

[16]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The role of behaviour in studying sustainable exploitation. , 2001 .

[17]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The relative roles of density and climatic variation on population dynamics and fecundity rates in three contrasting ungulate species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  On harvesting a structured ungulate population , 2000 .

[19]  B. Sæther,et al.  Age-specific harvest mortality in a Norwegian moose Alces alces population , 2000, Wildlife Biology.

[20]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer , 1999, Nature.

[21]  Terrance J. Quinn,et al.  Quantitative Fish Dynamics , 1999 .

[22]  C. Roberts,et al.  Fisheries benefits and optimal design of marine reserves , 1999 .

[23]  Optimal population harvesting in a source-sink environment , 1999 .

[24]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Cohort variation in male survival and lifetime breeding success in red deer. , 1998, The Journal of animal ecology.

[25]  K Shea,et al.  Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Noise and determinism in synchronized sheep dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[27]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Population dynamics of Norwegian red deer: density–dependence and climatic variation , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Marc Mangel,et al.  IMPLEMENTING THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT THROUGH MARINE RESERVES , 1998 .

[29]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Density–related changes in sexual selection in red deer , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  R. Lande,et al.  Harvesting Strategies for Fluctuating Populations Based on Uncertain Population Estimates , 1997 .

[31]  Tim Coulson,et al.  POPULATION SUBSTRUCTURE, LOCAL DENSITY, AND CALF WINTER SURVIVAL IN RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) , 1997 .

[32]  S. Lenhart,et al.  Controlling transboundary wildlife damage: modeling under alternative management scenarios , 1996 .

[33]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Estimating the minimum population size that allows a given annual number of mature red deer stags to be culled sustainably , 1996 .

[34]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Culling regimes and sex ratio biases in Highland red deer , 1994 .

[35]  H. Possingham,et al.  Optimal harvesting strategies for a metapopulation , 1994 .

[36]  Donald Ludwig,et al.  Uncertainty, Resource Exploitation, and Conservation: Lessons from History. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  C. Walters,et al.  Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. , 1993, Science.

[38]  Gordon R. Munro,et al.  THE OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF TRANSBOUNDARY FISHERIES: GAME THEORETIC CONSIDERATIONS , 1990 .

[39]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red deer in the Highlands , 1989 .

[40]  Veijo Kaitala,et al.  OPTIMAL RECOVERY OF A SHARED RESOURCE STOCK: A DIFFERENTIAL GAME MODEL WITH EFFICIENT MEMORY EQUILIBRIA , 1988 .

[41]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  On uncertain renewable resource stocks: Optimal harvest policies and the value of stock surveys , 1986 .

[42]  C. Walters,et al.  Are age-structured models appropriate for catch-effort data? , 1985 .