ASCA, SASCA and DPA with Enumeration: Which One Beats the Other and When?

We describe three contributions regarding the Soft Analytical Side-Channel Attacks SASCA introduced at Asiacrypt 2014. First, we compare them with Algebraic Side-Channel Attacks ASCA in a noise-free simulated setting. We observe that SASCA allow more efficient key recoveries than ASCA, even in this context favorable to the latter. Second, we describe the first working experiments of SASCA against an actual AES implementation. Doing so, we analyse their profiling requirements, put forward the significant gains they provide over profiled Differential Power Analysis DPA in terms of number of traces needed for key recoveries, and discuss the specificities of such concrete attacks compared to simulated ones. Third, we evaluate the distance between SASCA and DPA enhanced with computational power to perform enumeration, and show that the gap between both attacks can be quite reduced in this case. Therefore, our results bring interesting feedback for evaluation laboratories. They suggest that in several relevant scenarios e.g. attacks exploiting many known plaintexts, taking a small margin over the security level indicated by standard DPA with enumeration should be sufficient to prevent more elaborate attacks such as SASCA. By contrast, SASCA may remain the only option in more extreme scenarios e.g. attacks with unknown plaintexts/ciphertexts or against leakage-resilient primitives. We conclude by recalling the algorithmic dependency of the latter attacks, and therefore that our conclusions are specific to the AES.