Modeling the Metaverse : A theoretical model of effective team collaboration in 3D virtual environments

In this paper, a theoretical model of effective team collaboration in 3D virtual environments is presented. The aim of this model is to enhance our understanding of the capabilities exerting influence on effective 3D virtual team collaboration. The model identifies a number of specific capabilities of 3D virtual worlds that can contribute to this team effectiveness. Compared to "traditional" computer-mediated collaboration technologies, 3D virtual environments support team collaboration primarily through (a) the shared virtual environment, and (b) avatar-based interaction. Through the shared virtual environment, users experience higher levels of presence (a feeling of actually "being there"), realism and interactivity. These capabilities increase the users' level of information processing.  Avatar-based interaction induces greater feelings of social presence (being with others) and control over  self-presentation (how one wants to be perceived by others), thus increasing the level of communication support in the 3D environment. Through greater levels of information and communication support, a higher level of shared understanding is reached, which in turn positively influences team performance. Our paper concludes by presenting several propositions which allow further empirical testing, implications for research and practice, and suggestions for future research. The insights obtained from this paper can help developers of these virtual worlds to design standards for the capabilities that influence effective team collaboration in 3D virtual environments.

[1]  Steve Wheeler,et al.  Second Life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[2]  Peter Jones,et al.  Setting the Research Agenda , 2002 .

[3]  Chad Lin,et al.  A model to develop effective virtual teams , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  E. Salas,et al.  Virtual Teams: Effects of Technological Mediation on Team Performance , 2003 .

[5]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Reality , 2009, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[6]  Joseph E LeDoux.  The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life , 1996 .

[7]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[8]  W. Bainbridge.  The Scientific Research Potential of Virtual Worlds , 2007, Science.

[9]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  "Alone together?": exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games , 2006, CHI.

[10]  Mary Susan Weldon,et al.  Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Douglas T. Kenrick,et al.  Evolutionary Social Psychology , 2012 .

[12]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Humans and Persuasion: The Effects of Agency and Behavioral Realism , 2007 .

[13]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? , 1980 .

[14]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology, Second Edition , 2000 .

[15]  David A. Bray,et al.  Virtual worlds: multi-disciplinary research opportunities , 2007, DATB.

[16]  Rosa María Baños,et al.  Immersion and Emotion: Their Impact on the Sense of Presence , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Research methods for studying groups and teams : a guide to approaches, tools, and technologies , 2012 .

[18]  Jeffrey A. Miles,et al.  The effects of videoconference, telephone, and face-to-face media on interviewer and applicant judgments in employment interviews , 2001 .

[19]  Peter Neijens,et al.  Multiparty Negotiation Support: The Role of Visualization’s Influence on the Development of Shared Mental Models , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[21]  Rebecca Jestice,et al.  Team collaboration in virtual worlds , 2007, DATB.

[22]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[23]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Informing the design of a virtual environment to support learning in children , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[25]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness , 2004, Neural Networks.

[26]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  The Minnesota GDSS Research Project: Group Support Systems, Group Processes, and Outcomes , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Karl E. Keick.  Cosmos vs. chaos: Sense and nonsense in electronic contexts , 1985 .

[28]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[29]  Don R. Lyon,et al.  Inhibition of Return in Visual Identification Tasks , 1998 .

[30]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: a field experiment in group writing , 1990, CSCW '90.

[31]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[32]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[33]  Young Eun Lee,et al.  The Effects of Virtual Reality on Consumer Learning: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[34]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[35]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[36]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Transformed Social Interaction: Exploring the Digital Plasticity of Avatars , 2006 .

[37]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[38]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[39]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[40]  Ken Pimentel,et al.  Virtual reality - through the new looking glass , 1993 .

[41]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[42]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[43]  L. Thompson,et al.  Socially Shared Cognition, Affect, and Behavior: A Review and Integration , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[44]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[45]  Jihye Park,et al.  Online visual merchandising practice of apparel e-merchants , 2005 .

[46]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[47]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[49]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[50]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[51]  Michael W. Nicholson,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World , 1990 .

[52]  Tony Hindle,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World , 1990 .

[53]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[54]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Assessment of path choices on a country walk using a virtual environment , 2001 .

[55]  Eleni Stroulia,et al.  Virtual worlds - past, present, and future: New directions in social computing , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[56]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  The Role of 3-D Sound in Human Reaction and Performance in Augmented Reality Environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[57]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[58]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[59]  Mats Lind,et al.  2D vs 3D, implications on spatial memory , 2001, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001..

[60]  John D. Murphy,et al.  Avatars, People, and Virtual Worlds: Foundations for Research in Metaverses , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[61]  D. Grigorovici.  Persuasive Effects of Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003 .

[62]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[63]  C. Gibson,et al.  Virtual teams that work : creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness , 2003 .

[64]  K. Sassenberg.  Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. , 2002 .

[65]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Real Decisions in Virtual Worlds: Team Collaboration and Decision Making in 3D Virtual Worlds , 2010, ICIS.

[66]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Unbearable Likeness of Being Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[67]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[68]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Using Visual Representations of Data to Enhance Sensemaking in Data Exploration Tasks , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[69]  E. A. Attree,et al.  Training in virtual environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training , 2000, Ergonomics.

[70]  R. Tindale,et al.  ‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups , 2000 .

[71]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .