Family Violence and the Perpetration of Adolescent Dating Violence: Examining Social Learning and Social Control Processes

This study empirically examines why exposure to family violence and adolescent dating violence are associated. Data are from self-administered questionnaires completed in schools by 1,965 eighthand ninth-grade students. Exposure to family violence was positively associated with dating violence. For both genders, this relationship was mediated by the social-learning-theory-derived variables of acceptance of dating violence and aggressive conflict-response style. For males, the relationship also was mediated by the sociallearning-theory-derived variable of positive outcome expectations and the control-theory-derived variable of belief in the conventional rules of society. Key Words: adolescent dating violence, family violence, partner violence. Violence between parents, as well as parental violence against children, are considered types of family violence (Gelles, 1987; O'Leary, 1993). The relationships between exposure to those types of family violence and the use of dating violence have been studied extensively. Although exceptions exist, most studies report a significant positive association (DeMaris, 1990; Gwartney-Gibbs, Stockard, & Bohmer, 1987; Harris, 1996; LanghinrichsenRohling, Neidig, & Thorn, 1995; MacEwen, 1994; Marshall & Rose, 1988; White & Humphrey, 1994; see Sugarman & Hotaling, 1989, for a review of studies conducted before 1989). The mechanisms linking exposure to family violence to the perpetration of dating violence have not been examined in earlier studies. Such research could inform the development of interventions that counteract the negative impact of exposure to family violence. In this study, we examined potential mediators of the relationship between family violence and the perpetration of dating violence by adolescents. The mediators were derived from two theoretical perspectives: social learning theory (Bandura, 1977) and control theory (Hirschi, 1969). These perspectives describe socialization processes, have been used extensively to explain the development of problem behaviors by adolescents, and vary markedly in theoretical tenets (Benda & DiBlasio, 1991). THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Social Learning Theory Social learning theory posits that aggression is learned by observing the behavior of others and its positive consequences. Because learning is more likely to occur when models of behavior are perceived as having high status. competence, power, and exposure (Bandura, 1977), parents, who typically are viewed in this way by their children, are one of the main sources of learning for children. According to social learning theory, children who observe parents use violence observe an entire script for that behavior. Children observe not only the violent behavior but also emotional triggers for violence, circumstances of violence, and consequences of violence. These observations are among the factors that influence behavior. Whether the observed behaviors and associated cognitive patterns are learned depends on both the observed consequences of the behavior and the expected outcome of using the behavior. We generally think of violence as resulting in negative consequences, but because violence is a powerful means of coercion, children who observe family violence may see many functionally positive consequences of using violence. For example, a child who witnesses a father hit a mother may observe the deference shown by the mother toward the father, as well as other outcomes consistent with the father's wishes. Children who are abused may acknowledge the controlling effect that the abuse has on their behavior. In contrast, children who have not observed family violence have not seen functionally positive consequences associated with a family member's violence. Social learning theory, therefore, suggests that children of violent parents use violence because they have observed more functionally positive than negative consequences of their parents' use of violence and, therefore, have formed positive outcome expectations for using the behavior. …

[1]  Nancy J. Chodorow,et al.  The Reproduction of Mothering , 1999 .

[2]  M. O’Keefe,et al.  Victims of Dating Violence Among High School Students , 1998 .

[3]  I. Marshall,et al.  The Interethnic Generalizability of Social Control Theory: An Empirical Test , 1997 .

[4]  Vangie A. Foshee,et al.  Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries , 1996 .

[5]  M. B. Harris Aggressive Experiences and Aggressiveness: Relationship to Ethnicity, Gender, and Age1 , 1996 .

[6]  S. Tibbetts,et al.  Gender differences in factors of social control and rational choice , 1996 .

[7]  Karyl E. Macewen Refining the Intergenerational Transmission Hypothesis , 1994 .

[8]  P. Symons,et al.  Prevalence and predictors of adolescent dating violence. , 1994, Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc.

[9]  L. Silvern,et al.  Parenting and family stress as mediators of the long-term effects of child abuse. , 1994, Child abuse & neglect.

[10]  C. W. Linder,et al.  Factors associated with the use of violence among urban black adolescents. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[11]  M. Straus State-to-State Differences in Social Inequality and Social Bonds in Relation to Assaults on Wives in the United States , 1994 .

[12]  Jacquelyn W. White,et al.  Women's aggression in heterosexual conflicts , 1994, Aggressive Behavior.

[13]  Stephen A. Cernkovich,et al.  School Bonding, Race, and Delinquency , 1992 .

[14]  K. Bauman,et al.  Parental and peer characteristics as modifiers of the bond-behavior relationship: an elaboration of control theory. , 1992, Journal of health and social behavior.

[15]  B. K. Crew,et al.  Dating Violence, Social Learning Theory, and Gender: A Multivariate Analysis , 1992, Violence and Victims.

[16]  J. Junger-Tas An empirical test of social control theory , 1992 .

[17]  Brent B. Benda,et al.  Comparison of four theories of adolescent sexual exploration , 1991 .

[18]  A. DeMaris The Dynamics of Generational Transfer in Courtship Violence: A Biracial Exploration. , 1990 .

[19]  Dennis P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Social control theory: The salience of components by age, gender, and type of crime , 1988, Journal of Quantitative Criminology.

[20]  J. Udry,et al.  Biological Predispositions and Social Control in Adolescent Sexual Behavior. , 1988 .

[21]  Maureen A. Pirog-Good,et al.  Gender Identity, Self-Esteem, and Physical and Sexual Abuse in Dating Relationships , 1988 .

[22]  Nancy G. Guerra,et al.  Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: I. Assessment. , 1988 .

[23]  Maureen A. Pirog-Good,et al.  Violence in Dating Relationships , 1987 .

[24]  S. Lloyd Conflict in Premarital Relationships: Differential Perceptions of Males and Females. , 1987 .

[25]  Patricia A. Gwartney-Gibbs Learning Courtship Aggression: The Influence of Parents, Peers, and Personal Experiences. , 1987 .

[26]  C. Sigelman,et al.  Violence in College Students' Dating Relationships , 1984 .

[27]  B. Lahey,et al.  Peer assessment of the social behavior of accepted rejected and neglected children , 1984, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[28]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Community Context and Theories of Deviant Behavior: An Examination of Social Learning and Social Bonding Theories , 1984 .

[29]  D. Kalmuss The Intergenerational Transmission of Marital Aggression. , 1984 .

[30]  M. Krohn,et al.  Social bonding theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: a longitudinal analysis. , 1983, Journal of health and social behavior.

[31]  John C. Gessner,et al.  VIOLENCE IN COURTSHIP RELATIONS: A SOUTHERN SAMPLE , 1983 .

[32]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Romance and Violence in Dating Relationships , 1983 .

[33]  M. R. Laner,et al.  Abuse and aggression in courting couples , 1982 .

[34]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social maladjustment and problem solving in school-aged children. , 1982, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  David B. Griswold,et al.  Social Control Theory and Delinquency. , 1981 .

[36]  Marvin D. Krohn,et al.  Social Control and Delinquent Behavior: An Examination of the Elements of the Social Bond , 1980 .

[37]  J. Gottman Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations , 1980 .

[38]  Murray A. Straus,et al.  Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. , 1979 .

[39]  T. Hirschi Causes of Delinquency. , 1970, British medical journal.

[40]  F. Nye,et al.  Family Relationships and Delinquent Behavior , 1959 .

[41]  A. Reiss, Delinquency as the Failure of Personal and Social Controls , 1951 .

[42]  M. Straus,et al.  Corporal punishment of adolescents by parents: a risk factor in the epidemiology of depression, suicide, alcohol abuse, child abuse, and wife beating. , 1994, Adolescence.

[43]  L. Whitbeck,et al.  Intergenerational transmission of harsh parenting. , 1990 .

[44]  G. Margolin,et al.  Home observations of married couples reenacting naturalistic conflicts. , 1989 .

[45]  K. O’leary,et al.  A theoretical model of courtship aggression. , 1989 .

[46]  D. Sugarman,et al.  Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. , 1989 .

[47]  R. Neimeyer,et al.  Long-term effects of incestuous child abuse in college women: social adjustment, social cognition, and family characteristics. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[48]  M. Fromuth The relationship of childhood sexual abuse with later psychological and sexual adjustment in a sample of college women. , 1986, Child abuse & neglect.

[49]  C. Gilligan In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[50]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .