Inventions and their commercial exploitation in academic institutions: Analysing determinants among academics

Institutions of higher education are considered as an important source of innovation. Consequently, big efforts are made to facilitate technology transfer from academia into the market. However, technology transfer at German universities does not seem to live up to its full potential. We find for example that while 18,5% of our sample did in fact generate at least one invention, only 4,5% of the sample are engaged in commercialization activities. Therefore the vast majority of generated inventions remains unexploited. Based on this finding, we analyze how individual, career-related, and institutional factors affect the innovation and knowledge transfer activities of male and female academics. We show that Gender differences as well as career and human capital related factors (e.g. scope of employment, professional experience, and leadership position) affect such innovation transfer activities. While women generate fewer inventions than men, the fulltime employed researchers with a professional experience outside of academia and a leadership position lead to more inventions as well as partly higher exploitation activities.

[1]  Leaky pipeline ” – to be or not to be a useful metaphor in understanding why women to a disproportional degree exit from scientific careers , 2008 .

[2]  M. Wright,et al.  Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications , 2007 .

[3]  Dominika Polkowska.  Women Scientists in the Leaking Pipeline: Barriers to the Commercialisation of Scientific Knowledge by Women , 2013 .

[4]  Michael Williams,et al.  Entrepreneurial Process , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[5]  Yuan-Chieh Chang,et al.  The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective , 2009 .

[6]  Kerstin Ettl,et al.  Gender, Innovation und Unternehmensentwicklung , 2014 .

[7]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  The patenting activity of German Universities , 2015 .

[8]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Gender Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty , 2005 .

[9]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[10]  Arndt Werner.  Abbruch und Aufschub von Gründungsvorhaben: Eine empirische Analyse mit den Daten des Gründerpanels des IfM Bonn , 2011 .

[11]  Claire E. Buré.  Gender in/and science, technology and innovation policy : an overview of current literature and findings; strategic commissioned paper , 2007 .

[12]  Fiona E. Murray.  The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[13]  Kwansoo Kim,et al.  A Dynamic Analysis of University Agricultural Biotechnology Patent Production , 2003 .

[14]  Andrew A. Toole,et al.  University Spinoffs and the 'Performance Premium' , 2013 .

[15]  A. Kaasa,et al.  Effects of different dimensions of social capital on innovative activity : Evidence from Europe at the regional level , 2015 .

[16]  Laurel Smith-Doerr,et al.  Women Inventors in Context , 2008 .

[17]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[18]  Employment Growth and Firm Innovativeness — An Empirical Investigation of Women- and Men-Owned Small Ventures in Germany , 2006 .

[19]  Martin Hummel,et al.  University Patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What Role Did the Professors' Privilege Play? , 2009 .

[20]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .