Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex.

The neural basis of pattern recognition is a central problem in visual neuroscience. Responses of single cells were recorded in area V4 of macaque monkey to three classes of periodic stimuli that are based on spatial derivative operators: polar (concentric and radial), hyperbolic, and conventional sinusoidal (Cartesian) gratings. Of 118 cells tested, 16 percent responded significantly more to polar or hyperbolic (non-Cartesian) gratings than to Cartesian gratings and only 8 percent showed a significant preference for Cartesian gratings. Among cells selective for non-Cartesian gratings, those that preferred concentric gratings were most common. Cells selective for non-Cartesian gratings may constitute an important intermediate stage in pattern recognition and the representation of surface shape.

[1]  T. Caelli,et al.  The prediction of interactions between visual forms by products of lie operators , 1976 .

[2]  S. Palmer.  The role of symmetry in shape perception. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex , 1985, Vision Research.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: sensitivity to stimulus form. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Receptive field properties of neurons in area V3 of macaque monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Lowell D. Jacobson,et al.  Reponse suppression by extending sine-wave gratings within the receptive fields of neurons in visual cortical area V3A of the macaque monkey , 1987, Vision Research.

[7]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Temporal encoding of two-dimensional patterns by single units in primate inferior temporal cortex. I. Response characteristics. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey to band-pass spatial frequency filtered faces , 1987, Vision Research.

[9]  P. Dodwell,et al.  Global factors generate the mccollough effect , 1987, Vision Research.

[10]  D. C. Van Essen,et al.  Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Shape from shading , 1989 .

[12]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  P. Dodwell,et al.  A functional theory of the McCollough effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[14]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. II. Mechanisms of response selectivity revealed by small-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  J J Knierim,et al.  Neural responses to visual texture patterns in middle temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  A. Verri,et al.  First-order analysis of optical flow in monkey brain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.