LABILE: link quAlity-based lexIcaL routing mEtric for reactive routing protocols in IEEE 802.15.4 networks

In this paper, we propose a lexical routing metric to enable path-wise link quality-aware routing in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). The realization of this routing metric is achieved by applying the indexing techniques of formal language processing in multi-metric route classification and cost evaluation for WSNs. In particular, the metric is motivated from the fact that IEEE 802.15.4 networks are formed on links with highly variable quality, and selection of poor quality links degrades the data delivery considerably. Although IEEE 802.15.4 supports link-level awareness through LQI, (a) it remains unbeknownst at the path level, and therefore, (b) its processing is link-local in scope. We propose LABILE, a composite routing metric, that is implemented through modifying RREQ and RREP structures of AODV to capture and convey two-state link information to destination which in turn is processed through an easy to compute routing lexicon and a corresponding lexical algorithm for path selection in case of availability of multiple paths. Multiple paths are represented in a path space through a proposed cost model that encompasses hop-count, weak links and a quantity weakness factor of each link, depending upon a thresholding mechanism which in turn declares a link to be either healthy (aka usable) or weak (aka unusable). Using the weakness factor, the success probability of data delivery over weak link turns out to be a fraction of success probability at healthy link. The mathematical model along with the experiments done for LABILE show that proposed composite metric and its parsing scheme together achieve link robustness consistently by evading the link failures, as the number of weak links is fairly reduced in lexical path as compared to the hop-count-based metric. Increased data delivery is obtained through preventing retransmissions as on failure-prone links.

[1]  Ali Hammad Akbar,et al.  A lexicon based cost evaluation for multi-metric routing protocols in wireless sensor networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE 13th International Multitopic Conference.

[2]  David E. Culler,et al.  Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks , 2007, RFC.

[3]  M. Haenggi Twelve reasons not to route over many short hops , 2004, IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004.

[4]  Hai Zhao,et al.  An Energy Balanced Reliable Routing Metric in WSNs , 2009, Wirel. Sens. Netw..

[5]  Carles Gomez,et al.  Impact of LQI-Based Routing Metrics on the Performance of a One-to-One Routing Protocol for IEEE 802.15.4 Multihop Networks , 2010, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[6]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  a high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[7]  Philip Levis,et al.  An empirical study of low-power wireless , 2010, TOSN.

[8]  N. Wisitpongphan,et al.  Link-quality aware ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol , 2006, 2006 1st International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing.

[9]  Yu Wang,et al.  Multiple-Metric Hybrid Routing Protocol for Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networks , 2009, 2009 6th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference.

[10]  Suhua Tang,et al.  A Link Heterogeneity-Aware On-Demand Routing (LHAOR) Protocol Utilizing Local Update and RSSI Information , 2005, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Dipankar Raychaudhuri,et al.  PARMA: a PHY/MAC aware routing metric for ad-hoc wireless networks with multi-rate radios , 2005, Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks.

[12]  Zheng-Wu Yuan,et al.  Reliable routing algorithm on wireless sensor network , 2010, 2010 The 12th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

[13]  Ulrich Kortenkamp,et al.  Experimental mathematics and proofs in the classroom , 2004 .

[14]  Monique Becker,et al.  Link Quality and Local Load Balancing Routing Mechanisms in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 Sixth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications.

[15]  Leonard Kleinrock,et al.  The processor-sharing queueing model for time-shared systems with bulk arrivals , 1971, Networks.

[16]  S. Fdida,et al.  Cross-layer routing in wireless mesh networks , 2004, 1st International Symposium onWireless Communication Systems, 2004..

[17]  Michael B. Pursley,et al.  Tradeoffs in the design of routing metrics for frequency-hop wireless networks , 2000, MILCOM 2000 Proceedings. 21st Century Military Communications. Architectures and Technologies for Information Superiority (Cat. No.00CH37155).

[18]  Serge Fdida,et al.  The real gain of cross-layer routing in wireless mesh networks , 2006, REALMAN '06.

[19]  Klara Nahrstedt,et al.  The enhanced ticket-based routing algorithm , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[20]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[21]  Hiesik Kim,et al.  A study on energy-efficient tree routing protocol based on link quality metrics for remote air environmental monitoring sytem , 2009, 2009 ICCAS-SICE.

[22]  Lianfeng Shen,et al.  RPLRE: A Routing Protocol Based on LQI and Residual Energy for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, 2009 First International Conference on Information Science and Engineering.

[23]  Luis M. Correia,et al.  International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS) , 2008, ISWCS 2008.

[24]  Soohong Park,et al.  6LoWPAN Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (LOAD) , 2007 .

[25]  Mohamed G. Gouda,et al.  Maximizable routing metrics , 2003, TNET.

[26]  Mohit Sharma,et al.  HybridLQI: Hybrid MultihopLQI for Improving Asymmetric Links in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 Sixth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications.