Net versus combinatory effects of firm and industry antecedents of sales growth

This study examines antecedents of sales growth using a two-step mixed-method approach including analyses of net effects and combinatory effects. Based on a sample of 453 respondents from manufacturing and service firms, this article shows how the combination of structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) provides more detailed insights into the causal patterns of factors to explain sales growth. This article contributes to the extant literature by highlighting fsQCA as a useful method to analyze complex causality (specifically combinatory effects of antecedent conditions) and by discussing options regarding how this approach can be used to complement findings from conventional causal data analysis procedures that analyze net effects.

[1]  G. Tyge Payne.  Examining Configurations and Firm Performance in a Suboptimal Equifinality Context , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[2]  G. Hult,et al.  Knowledge as a strategic resource in supply chains , 2006 .

[3]  B. Rihoux.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods , 2006 .

[4]  Todd J. Arnold,et al.  Achieving relationship marketing effectiveness in business-to-business exchanges , 2008 .

[5]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond , 2016 .

[6]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[7]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Research on Organizational Configurations: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges , 2008 .

[8]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations , 2014 .

[9]  P. Davidsson,et al.  Arriving at the high growth firm , 2003 .

[10]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[11]  R. Gulati,et al.  STRATEGIC NETWORKS , 2000 .

[12]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size , 2009 .

[13]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[14]  S. Henneberg,et al.  Understanding configurations of relational attractiveness of the customer firm using fuzzy set QCA , 2015 .

[15]  H. Ju,et al.  Competitive Strategy , 2012 .

[16]  Patrick A. Mello.  Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2014 .

[17]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[18]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[19]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality and Measurement , 2015 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets: Agenda for a Research Approach and a Data Analysis Technique , 2010 .

[22]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Handbook of organization studies , 1997 .

[23]  Peer C. Fiss.  A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[24]  Vilmos F. Misangyi,et al.  Substitutes or Complements? A Configurational Examination of Corporate Governance Mechanisms , 2014 .

[25]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[26]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  When the Recipe Is More Important Than the Ingredients , 2014 .

[27]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[28]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Handbook of organization studies , 1997 .

[29]  P. Kotler,et al.  Marketing in the Network Economy , 1999 .

[30]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[31]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[32]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[33]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  Opposites Attract? Opportunities and Challenges for Integrating Large-N QCA and Econometric Analysis , 2013 .

[34]  Andrew D. Henderson,et al.  FIRM STRATEGY AND AGE DEPENDENCE: A CONTINGENT VIEW OF THE LIABILITIES OF NEWNESS, ADOLESCENCE, AND OBSOLESCENCE. , 1997 .

[35]  Thomas Elliott,et al.  FUZZY SET QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS , 2013 .

[36]  Santi Furnari,et al.  A Chemistry of Organization: Combinatory Analysis and Design , 2008 .

[37]  R. Gibrat,et al.  Les inégalités économiques : applications, aux inégalitês des richesses, a la concentration des entreprises, aux populations des villes, aux statistiques des familles, etc. : d'une loi nouvelle la loi de l'effet proportionnel , 1931 .

[38]  Alexander Leischnig,et al.  Employee Adaptive Behavior in Service Enactments , 2015 .

[39]  Alexander Leischnig,et al.  On the role of alliance management capability, organizational compatibility, and interaction quality in interorganizational technology transfer , 2014 .

[40]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance , 2006 .

[41]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  The good practices manifesto: Overcoming bad practices pervasive in current research in business , 2016 .

[42]  Scott Fricker,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys , 2005 .

[43]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[44]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Strategic Management Research , 2008 .

[45]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[46]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ From Large Firms in Competitive Behavior , 1995 .

[47]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Equifinality and the strategic groups—Performance relationship. , 2007 .

[48]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[49]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[50]  A. Woodside.  Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory , 2013 .

[51]  Jason R. Fitzsimmons,et al.  Performance Configurations over Time: Implications for Growth– and Profit–Oriented Strategies , 2009 .

[52]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[53]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research Chapter 3 The Two QCAs : From a Small-N to a Large-N Set Theoretic Approach , 2013 .

[54]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Fuzzy Sets , 2008 .

[55]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage , 2006, Political Analysis.

[56]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[57]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[58]  Gary Goertz,et al.  A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2006, Political Analysis.

[59]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities , 2014 .