Homosemiosis, mimicry and superficial similarity: notes on the conceptualization of independent emergence of similarity in biology

Independent phenotypic emergence of superficially similar traits is a phenomenon frequently reported from investigations in the whole biota. Superficial similarity (including mimicry) is frequently explained as results of selective forces (predation or external environment). However, the mechanisms underlying independent (polyphyletic) emergence of similar phenotypic features remain largely unknown. A part of superficial similarity may emerge due to the occasional re-activation of latent genetic and/or developmental precursors. A specific kind of superficial similarity is represented by the phenomenon of mimicry that presupposes the attendance of a particular animal-interpreter. Despite diversity of ways how mimetic patterns are generated, they are structurally similar and often bear a common semantic message for an interpreter (predator); therefore, the term “homosemiosis” is proposed for such cases of sign-mediated correspondences where congruence of meaning appears.

[1]  Alec L. Panchen,et al.  Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology , 1992 .

[2]  N. Vavilov,et al.  The law of homologous series in variation , 1922, Journal of Genetics.

[3]  W. Hennig Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik , 1950 .

[4]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  Development and evolution on the wing , 2002 .

[5]  A. Meyer Homology and homoplasy: the retention of genetic programmes. , 1999, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[6]  W. Hennig Phylogenetic Systematics , 2002 .

[7]  Taylor J. Maxwell,et al.  Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects , 2003, Nature.

[8]  Harry J. Jerison,et al.  Evolution, Brain, and Behavior: Persistent Problems , 1976 .

[9]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  "Development, Plasticity and Evolution of Butterfly Eyespot Patterns" (1996), by Paul M. Brakefield et al. , 2013 .

[10]  H. Bates,et al.  XXXII. Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidæ. , 1862 .

[11]  J. Uexküll Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere , 1921 .

[12]  G. Witzany,et al.  Serial Endosymbiotic Theory (Set): The Biosemiotic Update , 2006, Acta biotheoretica.

[13]  C. Guglielmino,et al.  Semes and Genes in Africa1 , 2002, Current Anthropology.

[14]  Michael T. Ghiselin,et al.  The Distinction Between Similarity and Homology , 1969 .

[15]  R. Owen,et al.  Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals, delivered at the Royal college of surgeons, in 1843. By Richard Owen ... From notes taken by William White Cooper ... and revised by Professor Owen. , 1843 .

[16]  Michael T. Ghiselin,et al.  Homology as a relation of correspondence between parts of individuals , 2005, Theory in Biosciences.

[17]  L. Plate Allgemeine Zoologie und Abstammungslehre , 1922, Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.

[18]  A. Bennett The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection; or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1872, Nature.

[19]  B. Hall,et al.  Latent homologues for the neural crest as an evolutionary novelty , 2004, Evolution & development.

[20]  Brian K. Hall,et al.  Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology , 1994 .

[21]  Makoto Ojika,et al.  Firefly luciferase is a bifunctional enzyme: ATP‐dependent monooxygenase and a long chain fatty acyl‐CoA synthetase , 2003, FEBS letters.

[22]  K. Kleisner,et al.  The Formation of the Theory of Homology in Biological Sciences , 2007, Acta biotheoretica.

[23]  L. Plate Allgemeine Zoologie und Abstammungslehre / von Ludwig Plate. , 1922 .

[24]  Filip Grygar,et al.  TOWARDS A DARWINIAN BIOSEMIOTICS. LIFE AS MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING , 2008 .

[25]  D. Wake,et al.  Homoplasy, homology and the problem of 'sameness' in biology. , 1999, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[26]  S. Carroll,et al.  Genetic mechanisms and constraints governing the evolution of correlated traits in drosophilid flies , 2003, Nature.

[27]  René Girard,et al.  Mimesis as a phenomenon of semiotic communication , 2004 .

[28]  V. French,et al.  Butterfly wings: Colour patterns and now gene expression patterns , 1994 .

[29]  W. Fitch Homology a personal view on some of the problems. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[30]  H. Nijhout,et al.  The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns , 1991 .

[31]  Y. Oba,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships of click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae) inferred from 28S ribosomal DNA: insights into the evolution of bioluminescence in Elateridae. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[32]  Anton Markoš,et al.  Semetic rings: towards the new concept of mimetic resemblances , 2005, Theory in Biosciences.

[33]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  Homoplasy. The Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution. , 1997 .

[34]  Marcello Barbieri,et al.  Introduction to Biosemiotics , 2007 .

[35]  C. Darwin Charles Darwin The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2004 .

[36]  K. Wood THE CHEMICAL MECHANISM and EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT OF BEETLE BIOLUMINESCENCE , 1995 .

[37]  D. Wake Homoplasy: The Result of Natural Selection, or Evidence of Design Limitations? , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[38]  C. Darwin,et al.  On the origin of species by means of natural selection; or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life / by Charles Darwin. , 1860 .

[39]  Alec L. Panchen,et al.  Classification, evolution, and the nature of biology: Author index , 1992 .

[40]  O. A. Sæther Underlying Synapomorphies and Anagenetic Analysis , 1979 .

[41]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Evolutionary Developmental Biology: New challenges to the homology concept?—The 46th Phylogenetisches Symposium held in Jena , 2008, Theory in Biosciences.