Polarization and consensus by opposing external sources

We introduce a socially motivated extension of the voter model in which individual voters are also influenced by two opposing, fixed-opinion news sources. These sources forestall consensus and instead drive the population to a politically polarized state, with roughly half the population in each opinion state. Two types social networks for the voters are studied: (a) the complete graph of $N$ voters and, more realistically, (b) the two-clique graph with $N$ voters in each clique. For the complete graph, many dynamical properties are soluble within an annealed-link approximation, in which a link between a news source and a voter is replaced by an average link density. In this approximation, we show that the average consensus time grows as $N^\alpha$, with $\alpha = p\ell/(1-p)$. Here $p$ is the probability that a voter consults a news source rather than a neighboring voter, and $\ell$ is the link density between a news source and voters, so that $\alpha$ can be greater than 1. The polarization time, namely, the time to reach a politically polarized state from an initial strong majority state, is typically much less than the consensus time. For voters on the two-clique graph, either reducing the density of interclique links or enhancing the influence of news sources again promotes polarization.

[1]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization , 2015 .

[2]  S. Redner,et al.  Nonuniversal opinion dynamics driven by opposing external influences. , 2019, Physical review. E.

[3]  Stefan Grosskinsky Warwick,et al.  Interacting particle systems , 2009 .

[4]  Ira B Schwartz,et al.  Enhanced vaccine control of epidemics in adaptive networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Michael G. Rabbat,et al.  The Effect of Exogenous Inputs and Defiant Agents on Opinion Dynamics With Local and Global Interactions , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[6]  S. Redner,et al.  Voter models on heterogeneous networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  F. Vazquez,et al.  Analytical solution of the voter model on uncorrelated networks , 2008, 0803.1686.

[8]  Adrian Carro,et al.  The noisy voter model on complex networks , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[9]  S. Redner A guide to first-passage processes , 2001 .

[10]  Krzysztof Suchecki,et al.  Voter model dynamics in complex networks: Role of dimensionality, disorder, and degree distribution. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Alain Barrat,et al.  Who's talking first? Consensus or lack thereof in coevolving opinion formation models. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[12]  A. Gelman,et al.  Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[14]  P. Clifford,et al.  A model for spatial conflict , 1973 .

[15]  Michael T. Gastner,et al.  Voter model on networks partitioned into two cliques of arbitrary sizes , 2019, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[16]  S. Redner,et al.  A Kinetic View of Statistical Physics , 2010 .

[17]  M. Scheucher,et al.  A soluble kinetic model for spinodal decomposition , 1988 .

[18]  1 1 M ar 2 00 8 Analytical Solution of the Voter Model on Disordered Networks , 2021 .

[19]  S. Galam,et al.  The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics , 2007, physics/0703021.

[20]  Flávio L. Pinheiro,et al.  Consensus and polarization in competing complex contagion processes , 2018, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[21]  S. Redner,et al.  Dynamics of confident voting , 2011, 1111.3883.

[22]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use , 2009 .

[23]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Voter model on the two-clique graph. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  E. Ben-Naim,et al.  Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes , 2002, cond-mat/0212313.

[25]  Maxi San Miguel,et al.  First-passage distributions for the one-dimensional Fokker-Planck equation , 2018, Physical Review E.

[26]  Neal Madras,et al.  The noisy voter model , 1995 .

[27]  S. Redner,et al.  Reality-inspired voter models: A mini-review , 2018, Comptes Rendus Physique.

[28]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[29]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[30]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Consensus time and conformity in the adaptive voter model. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  M. Mobilia Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters? , 2003, Physical review letters.

[32]  Sidney Redner,et al.  A guide to first-passage processes , 2001 .

[33]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Political Polarization in the American Public , 2008 .

[34]  D. Parisi,et al.  Comparison of voter and Glauber ordering dynamics on networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  Leonard Lewin,et al.  Polylogarithms and Associated Functions , 1981 .

[36]  S Redner,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on degree-heterogeneous graphs. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[37]  Krapivsky Kinetics of monomer-monomer surface catalytic reactions. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[38]  S. Redner,et al.  Heterogeneous voter models. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  D. Sherrington Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[40]  J. T. Cox,et al.  Coalescing Random Walks and Voter Model Consensus Times on the Torus in $\mathbb{Z}^d$ , 1989 .

[41]  M. Newman,et al.  Nonequilibrium phase transition in the coevolution of networks and opinions. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[42]  Sidney Redner,et al.  Can partisan voting lead to truth? , 2010, ArXiv.

[43]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Epidemic dynamics on an adaptive network. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[44]  R. Holley,et al.  Ergodic Theorems for Weakly Interacting Infinite Systems and the Voter Model , 1975 .

[45]  H. Hinrichsen,et al.  Critical coarsening without surface tension: the universality class of the voter model. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[46]  M. Prior,et al.  Media and Political Polarization , 2013 .

[47]  S. Redner,et al.  On the role of zealotry in the voter model , 2007 .

[48]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  The emergence of consensus: a primer , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[50]  V. Eguíluz,et al.  Conservation laws for the voter model in complex networks , 2004, cond-mat/0408101.

[51]  Raul Toral,et al.  Zealots in the mean-field noisy voter model. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[52]  Ali Yurukoglu,et al.  Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization , 2014 .

[53]  Ira B Schwartz,et al.  Fluctuating epidemics on adaptive networks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[54]  N. Stroud Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure , 2010 .

[55]  R. Durrett,et al.  Graph fission in an evolving voter model , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  S. Redner,et al.  Opinion Formation under Antagonistic Influences , 2019, 1907.13103.

[57]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Dynamics of latent voters. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[58]  A. Barrat,et al.  Consensus formation on adaptive networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[59]  Matthew Levendusky Why Do Partisan Media Polarize Viewers , 2013 .

[60]  S. Redner,et al.  Voter model on heterogeneous graphs. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[61]  H. Kramers Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , 1940 .