The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches

The serial pattern found for conjunction visual-search tasks has been attributed to covert attentional shifts, even though the possible contributions of target location have not been considered. To investigate the effect of target location on orientation × color conjunction searches, the target’s duration and its position in the display were manipulated. The display was present either until observers responded (Experiment 1), for 104 msec (Experiment 2), or for 62 msec (Experiment 3). Target eccentricity critically affected performance: A pronounced eccentricity effect was very similar for all three experiments; as eccentricity increased, reaction times and errors increased gradually. Furthermore, the set-size effect became more pronounced as target eccentricity increased, and the extent of the eccentricity effect increased for larger set sizes. In addition, according to stepwise regressions, target eccentricity as well as its interaction with set size were good predictors of performance. We suggest that these findings could be explained by spatial-resolution and lateral-inhibition factors. The serial self-terminating hypothesis for orientation × color conjunction searches was evaluated and rejected. We compared the eccentricity effect as well as the extent of the orientation asymmetry in these three conjunction experiments with those found in feature experiments (Carrasco & Katz, 1992). The roles of eye movements, spatial resolution, and covert attention in the eccentricity effect, as well as their implications, are discussed.

[1]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  G. Mowbray,et al.  Visual Masking , 1964, Nature.

[4]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  W. Estes,et al.  Effects of spaces on report from tachistoscopically presented letter strings , 1971 .

[6]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  S. Appelle.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  J. Townsend.  SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[9]  L A Lefton,et al.  Information extraction from different retinal locations. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Neural Basis of Orientation Perception in Primate Vision , 1974, Science.

[11]  G Wolford,et al.  Perturbation model for letter identification. , 1975, Psychological review.

[12]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Configurational effects in visual information processing , 1976 .

[13]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Retinal locus and acuity in visual information processing , 1977 .

[14]  K H Shum,et al.  Evidence for feature perturbations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[17]  E. Farmer,et al.  Visual search through color displays: Effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  S. Diamond,et al.  Effect of Surface , 1982 .

[20]  A. Treisman.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  C Bundesen,et al.  Color segregation and visual search , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  D. LaBerge.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  B. Julesz,et al.  Human factors and behavioral science: Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[24]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.

[25]  F. Crick.  Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Visual masking : an integrative approach , 1984 .

[27]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  T. J. Whitaker,et al.  Continuous-wave double-resonance ionization mass spectrometry of barium , 1985 .

[29]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  H. Pashler,et al.  Visual attention and stimulus identification. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  T. Poggio,et al.  Spotlight on attention , 1985, Trends in Neurosciences.

[33]  M. Cannon,et al.  Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[34]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[35]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Features and objects in visual processing , 1986 .

[36]  G. Shulman,et al.  Gradients of spatial attention. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[37]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  M. Posner,et al.  Does attention affect visual feature integration? , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  E. Yund,et al.  Scanning the visual field without eye movements—A sex difference , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  Burkhart Fischer,et al.  THE ROLE OF ATTENTION IN THE PREPARATION OF VISUALLY GUIDED SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENTS IN MAN , 1987 .

[45]  H. Pashler.  Target-distractor discriminability in visual search , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  B. Julesz,et al.  Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[47]  S B Steinman,et al.  Serial and Parallel Search in Pattern Vision? , 1987, Perception.

[48]  J Wilson,et al.  Spatial Frequency and Selective Attention to Local and Global Information , 1987, Perception.

[49]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[50]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computational processes in human vision : an interdisciplinary perspective , 1988 .

[51]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[52]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[53]  C. J. Downing.  Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[55]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  R Klein,et al.  Search performance without eye movements , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Charles Folk,et al.  Spatial parallelism in the processing of lines, letters, and lexicality. , 1989 .

[58]  G. Moraglia.  Visual Search: Spatial Frequency and Orientation , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[59]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[60]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Shifting of attentional focus within and about a visual display , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[61]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[62]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  N. Chmiel.  Response effects in the perception of conjunctions of colour and form , 1989, Psychological research.

[64]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[65]  M. Cheal,et al.  Attention Effects on Form Discrimination at Different Eccentricities , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[66]  G. Moraglia,et al.  Display organization and the detection of horizontal line segments , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[67]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[69]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Sensitivity To Three-Dimensional Orientation in Visual Search , 1990 .

[70]  G J Andersen,et al.  Focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[71]  E. Yund,et al.  Target detection in one visual field in the presence or absence of stimuli in the contralateral field by right-and left-handed subjects , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[72]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Limitations on the Parallel Guidance of Visual Search : Color x Color and Orientation x Orientation Conjuctions , 2004 .

[74]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability gradients as a function of target location , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[75]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability as a function of target location: Effects of spatial configuration , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[76]  F. Previc.  Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[77]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features , 1990 .

[78]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  11 – FORM PERCEPTION AND ATTENTION: Striate Cortex and Beyond , 1990 .

[79]  J. Townsend.  Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[80]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[81]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability as a function of spatial location: Effects of selective attention , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[82]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited , 1990 .

[83]  E. Yund,et al.  Serial processing of visual spatial patterns in a search paradigm , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[84]  A. Treisman.  Variations on the theme of feature integration: Reply to Navon (1990). , 1990 .

[85]  Visual detectability gradients: The effect of distractors in contralateral field , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[86]  B Julesz,et al.  The speed of attentional shifts in the visual field. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[87]  A. Treisman.  Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[88]  H E Egeth,et al.  Local processes in preattentive feature detection. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[89]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[90]  H Egeth,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[91]  E. W. Yund,et al.  Visual detectability gradients: Effect of illiteracy , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[92]  H. Egeth,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. , 1991 .

[93]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Local processes in preattentive feature detection. , 1991 .

[94]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[95]  E. E. Cooper,et al.  Object recognition and laterality: Null effects , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[96]  M. Cheal,et al.  Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[97]  J. Wolfe.  The Parallel Guidance of Visual Attention , 1992 .

[98]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[99]  F. Wilkinson,et al.  Distractor Ratio and Grouping Processes in Visual Conjunction Search , 1992, Perception.

[100]  B. Fischer,et al.  Express saccades and visual attention , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[101]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[102]  H. J. Muller,et al.  SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[103]  Asher Cohen,et al.  Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets , 1993 .

[104]  M. Carrasco,et al.  An Unreported Size Illusion , 1993, Perception.

[105]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Eye movements during visual search , 1993 .

[106]  A Cohen.  Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[107]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.