Adopting Paivio's General Analytic Framework to Examine Imagery Use in Sport

This study examined the use of imagery according to Paivio's (1985) general analytic framework. The aims were to examine functional differences in imagery use according to the five subscales of the SIQ, to investigate differences in imagery use by competitive level, and to explore the influence on the use of imagery of skills involving a perceptual target (reactive tasks) and without a perceptual target (nonreactive tasks). Participants included 484 individuals (280 male, 204 female), with a mean age of 20.39 (SD = 4.10) from the United Kingdom, Finland, and Australia. The group comprised 84 national, 210 state, 120 district, and 70 recreational level athletes representing 54 sports. Participants completed a demographic information sheet and the Sport Imagery Questionnaire (SIQ). Participants were classified according to competitive level and task type. Results indicated that overall participants used more motivational general-mastery imagery. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance revealed that there were significant differences among the four competitive levels on imagery use with the district level participants reporting significantly higher use of motivational general-arousal (MG-A) imagery than state and national level participants and national level participants reporting higher use of cognitive specific (CS) imagery than recreational level participants. There was also a significant difference between tasks with a perceptual target and tasks with no target for motivational-specific imagery, with higher scores for tasks with a perceptual target. The results suggest the continued evaluation of imagery use in relation to competitive level and support that task type may influence the functional use of imagery in sport.

[1]  Cheryl Coker,et al.  Motor Learning and Control for Practitioners , 2003 .

[2]  C. Hall,et al.  The imagery ability, imagery use, and performance relationship , 2005 .

[3]  Tony Morris,et al.  Reliability and Factor Structure of the Finnish Version of the Sport Imagery Questionnaire , 2006, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  T. Morris,et al.  Internal and External Imagery Perspective Measurement and Use in Imagining Open and Closed Sports Skills: An Exploratory Study , 2007, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  C. Hall,et al.  Motivational orientations and imagery use: a goal profiling analysis , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  K. J. Munroe,et al.  The influence of type of sport and time of season on athletes' use of imagery. , 1998 .

[7]  Coaches' Encouragement of Athletes' Imagery Use , 2007, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  C. Hall,et al.  Imagery Use in Elite Youth Sport Participants: Reinforcing the Applied Significance of Achievement Goal Theory , 2003, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[9]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Motor Learning and Performance , 1991 .

[10]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Imagery use by athletes: development of the Sport Imagery Questionnaire. , 1998 .

[11]  M. Arvinen-Barrow,et al.  Elite and Novice Athletes' Imagery Use in Open and Closed Sports , 2007 .

[12]  Kathleen A. Martin,et al.  Imagery Use in Sport: A Literature Review and Applied Model , 1999 .

[13]  Kevin L. Burke,et al.  The Relationship Between the Use and Effectiveness of Imagery: An Exploratory Investigation , 2003 .

[14]  Peter R. Giacobbi,et al.  The Four Ws of Imagery Use: Where, When, Why, and What , 2000 .

[15]  Jennifer Cumming,et al.  Deliberate imagery practice: the development of imagery skills in competitive athletes , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  G. Relyea,et al.  Differences in Imagery Content and Imagery Ability Between High and Low Confident Track and Field Athletes , 2002 .

[17]  A. Paivio.  Cognitive and motivational functions of imagery in human performance. , 1985, Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport.

[18]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .