First clinical results of the Locking Compression Plate (LCP).

The Locking Compression Plate (LCP) is a new screw-plate system that offers the possibility of inserting conventional and locking head screws into the specially designed combination holes. It represents a further development of the PC-Fix and the LISS and was released for clinical application in March 2000. In a prospective multicentre study, the new system was used to treat 144 patients (f: 67, m: 77; average age: 51.4 years) with 169 fractures: of these, 57 were tibial fractures, 45 humerus, 19 radius and 18 femoral. After one year, clinical and radiological follow-up assessment was carried out on 127 patients with 151 fractures (88%). In 130 fractures (86%), healing took place within the expected period and without complication or secondary dislocation ("uneventful healing"). In 19 patients, a total of 27 unexpected complications occurred ("adverse events"), in which 18 revision operations were necessary in 13 patients: five for implant loosening/pull-out, four for plate failure, one for non-union, five for secondary fractures immediately adjacent to the implant after a subsequent injury and two for infection. Analysis by a committee of experts indicated that mechanical complications arose entirely from technical errors of application (incorrect fixation technique, incorrect choice of plate). No purely implant-related complications were observed. The new system can be regarded as technically mature. It offers numerous fixation possibilities and has proven its worth in complex fractures situations and in revision operations after the failure of other implants. A good knowledge of biomechanics is essential as well as precise preoperative planning.

[1]  C. Bourgeault,et al.  Screw Position Affects Dynamic Compression Plate Strain in an In Vitro Fracture Model , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[2]  R. Frigg,et al.  Locking Compression Plate (LCP). An osteosynthesis plate based on the Dynamic Compression Plate and the Point Contact Fixator (PC-Fix). , 2001, Injury.

[3]  R. Hertel,et al.  Biomechanical and biological considerations relating to the clinical use of the Point Contact-Fixator--evaluation of the device handling test in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the radius and/or ulna. , 2001, Injury.

[4]  C. Krettek,et al.  Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. , 1997, Injury.

[5]  M. Schütz,et al.  Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm using the Point Contact Fixator (PC-Fix): results of 387 fractures of a prospective multicentric study (PC-Fix II). , 2001, Injury.

[6]  J. Borrelli,et al.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia. , 1997, Injury.

[7]  C Krettek,et al.  Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. , 2001, Injury.

[8]  G. Hierholzer,et al.  [Value of bridging plate osteosynthesis in multiple fragment fracture damage of the femur in a clinical comparison]. , 1986, Der Unfallchirurg.

[9]  S. Perren,et al.  Susceptibility to local infection in biological internal fixation , 1999, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[10]  L. Claes,et al.  Fixation technique influences osteogenesis of comminuted fractures. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  U. Pfister,et al.  [Non unions of the humerus shaft (author's transl)]. , 1982, Unfallchirurgie.

[12]  M. Runkel,et al.  Minimally invasive plate fixation in femoral shaft fractures. , 1997, Injury.

[13]  L. Gotzen,et al.  [The "biological" plate osteosynthesis in multi-fragment fractures of the para-articular femur. A prospective study]. , 1994, Der Unfallchirurg.

[14]  H. Eijer,et al.  Influence of the design for fixation implants on local infection: experimental study of dynamic compression plates versus point contact fixators in rabbits. , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.