Sensing the Pulse of Urban Activity Centers Leveraging Bike Sharing Open Data

Understanding social activities in Urban Activity Centers can benefit both urban authorities and citizens. Traditionally, monitoring large social activities usually incurs significant costs of human labor and time. Fortunately, with the recent booming of urban open data, a wide variety of human digital footprints have become openly accessible, providing us with new opportunities to understand the social dynamics in the cities. In this paper, we resort to urban open data from bike sharing systems, and propose a two-phase framework to identify social activities in Urban Activity Centers based on bike sharing open data. More specifically, we first detect bike usage anomalies from the bike trip data, and then identify the potential social activities from the detected anomalies using a proposed heuristic method by considering both spatial and temporal constraints. We evaluate our framework based on the large-scale real-world dataset collected from the bike sharing system of Washington, D.C. The results show that our framework can efficiently identify social activities in different types of Urban Activity Centers and outperforms the baseline approach. In particular, our framework can identify 89% of the social activities in the major Urban Activity Centers of Washington, D.C.

[1]  Xing Xie,et al.  GeoLife: Managing and Understanding Your Past Life over Maps , 2008, The Ninth International Conference on Mobile Data Management (mdm 2008).

[2]  Daqing Zhang,et al.  Modeling User Activity Preference by Leveraging User Spatial Temporal Characteristics in LBSNs , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[3]  James Caverlee,et al.  How big is the crowd?: event and location based population modeling in social media , 2013, HT.

[4]  J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: A GIS approach , 2012 .

[5]  Daqing Zhang,et al.  From taxi GPS traces to social and community dynamics , 2013, ACM Comput. Surv..

[6]  Luca Di Gaspero,et al.  Constraint-Based Approaches for Balancing Bike Sharing Systems , 2013, CP.

[7]  Daqing Zhang,et al.  The Emergence of Social and Community Intelligence , 2011, Computer.

[8]  Daqing Zhang,et al.  Container throughput estimation leveraging ship GPS traces and open data , 2014, UbiComp.

[9]  Rong Du,et al.  Predicting activity attendance in event-based social networks: content, context and social influence , 2014, UbiComp.

[10]  Zhaohui Wu,et al.  Trace analysis and mining for smart cities: issues, methods, and applications , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  P. DeMaio Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future , 2009 .

[12]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Non-parametric Model for Background Subtraction , 2000, ECCV.

[13]  Gang Pan,et al.  GreenBicycling: A Smartphone-Based Public Bicycle Sharing System for Healthy Life , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing.

[14]  M. C. Jones,et al.  A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation , 1991 .

[15]  Xing Xie,et al.  Urban computing with taxicabs , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[16]  Zhaohui Wu,et al.  City-Scale Social Event Detection and Evaluation with Taxi Traces , 2015, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..