A pooling-LiNGAM algorithm for effective connectivity analysis of fMRI data

The Independent Component Analysis (ICA)—linear non-Gaussian acyclic model (LiNGAM), an algorithm that can be used to estimate the causal relationship among non-Gaussian distributed data, has the potential value to detect the effective connectivity of human brain areas. Under the assumptions that (a): the data generating process is linear, (b) there are no unobserved confounders, and (c) data have non-Gaussian distributions, LiNGAM can be used to discover the complete causal structure of data. Previous studies reveal that the algorithm could perform well when the data points being analyzed is relatively long. However, there are too few data points in most neuroimaging recordings, especially functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to allow the algorithm to converge. Smith's study speculates a method by pooling data points across subjects may be useful to address this issue (Smith et al., 2011). Thus, this study focus on validating Smith's proposal of pooling data points across subjects for the use of LiNGAM, and this method is named as pooling-LiNGAM (pLiNGAM). Using both simulated and real fMRI data, our current study demonstrates the feasibility and efficiency of the pLiNGAM on the effective connectivity estimation.

[1]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  David Heckerman,et al.  Learning Gaussian Networks , 1994, UAI.

[3]  Hongyan Chen,et al.  Altered Effective Connectivity of the Default Mode Network in Resting-State Amnestic Type Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2013, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[4]  Tom Burr,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search , 2003, Technometrics.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Effective Connectivity and Intersubject Variability: Using a Multisubject Network to Test Differences and Commonalities , 2002, NeuroImage.

[6]  Shohei Shimizu,et al.  Use of non-normality in structural equation modeling: Application to direction of causation , 2008 .

[7]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  A Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal Discovery , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  D. Hibbs.  On analyzing the effects of policy interventions : Box-Jenkins and Box-Tiao vs. structural equation models , 1977 .

[11]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent Component Analysis Using an Extended Infomax Algorithm for Mixed Subgaussian and Supergaussian Sources , 1999, Neural Computation.

[12]  Karl J. Friston.  Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[13]  E. Formisano,et al.  Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[14]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[15]  Shohei Shimizu,et al.  Joint estimation of linear non-Gaussian acyclic models , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[16]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian network modeling of fMRI: A comparison of group-analysis methods , 2008, NeuroImage.

[19]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[20]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Independent component analysis, A new concept? , 1994, Signal Process..

[21]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Seungjin Choi,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2009, Handbook of Natural Computing.

[23]  Jagath C. Rajapakse,et al.  Learning functional structure from fMR images , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[25]  D. Chakrabarti,et al.  A fast fixed - point algorithm for independent component analysis , 1997 .

[26]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  A Multi-Subject, Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNS) Framework for Brain Effective Connectivity , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[27]  R. Buxton,et al.  Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-Mode Activity during a Passive Sensory Task: Uncoupled from Deactivation but Impacting Activation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al.  Can Meaningful Effective Connectivities Be Obtained between Auditory Cortical Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[31]  C. Robert Kenley,et al.  Gaussian influence diagrams , 1989 .

[32]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Advances and Pitfalls in the Analysis and Interpretation of Resting-State FMRI Data , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[33]  Li Yao,et al.  Temporal and instantaneous connectivity of default mode network estimated using Gaussian Bayesian network frameworks , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  David Heckerman,et al.  A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks , 1999, Innovations in Bayesian Networks.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  J. Lynch,et al.  Cortico-cortical networks and cortico-subcortical loops for the higher control of eye movements. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[37]  C. Stein,et al.  Structural equation modeling. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[38]  S. Bressler,et al.  Stochastic modeling of neurobiological time series: power, coherence, Granger causality, and separation of evoked responses from ongoing activity. , 2006, Chaos.