Exploration of PROMETHEE II and VIKOR methodology in a MCDM approach for ascertaining the optimal performance-emission trade-off vantage in a hydrogen-biohol dual fuel endeavour

Abstract In order to meet the challenges of global energy insecurity and the increasing obligation of complying with the environmental legislation, a paradigm shift from the reliance of conventional fossil fuel resources in IC engine domains are being increasingly witnessed. Exhaustive research has been carried out with non-conventional and alternative fuels resources in the off-road and transportation sector to meet the challenges of exploring a potential alternative to conventional diesel fuel with the additional objective of meeting the ever increasing stridency of the emission mandates. Among various alternative fuels, hydrogen whose clean and green burning characteristics has proven to be viable, sustainable fuels in IC engine domains with the premium quoting as one of the significant low emission signature than conventional fuels. Biodiesel, on the other hand, presents itself as a ready-to-use sustainable alternative in diesel powertrains in the environment of its National agricultural and rural economic development potential. As hydrogen is deemed to increase NOx emission when it is used with biodiesel, ethanol (20% v/v) blend with biodiesel has been used as a viable NOx suppression measure owing to its superior miscibility in methyl ester in comparison to conventional diesel. To this end, single cylinder diesel engine has been made to operate in a dual fuel mode with hydrogen as the dual fuel and mahua methyl ester with ethanol in blend as pilot fuel. The present aims of the study are to choose the best suitable fuel combination among the alternatives, in relation to various attributes chosen especially with an eye to address the performance-emission trade-off potential of the dual fuel operation. The most appropriate duel fuel combination out of ten alternatives has been discerned through distinct multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodologies. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been applied for finding the weightage of each criterion and ranks of the alternatives investigated have been calculated by using VIKOR and PROMETHEE II methods. The alternative which signified biodiesel under hydrogen enrichment, at hydrogen injection duration of 9000 µs at a constant engine speed of 1500 RPM, was discerned as the the most appropriate alternative fuel combination at 75% load since it has been ranked first by both the MCDM methods. At full load for PROMETHEE II it was alternative A4, and for VIKOR it was observed as alternative A3 which signified biodiesel under hydrogen enrichment at hydrogen injection duration of 7000 µs at 1500 RPM. Alternatively, A10 strategy which indicate biodiesel ethanol blend along with hydrogen enrichment at hydrogen injection duration of 13,000 µs at 1500 RPM was observed to be the least preferential amongst the alternative for both the MCDM methods, at both 75% and 100% loads. Since there was consistency in the ranking, in order to judge the performance of both the methods Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient was calculated and was observed to be within acceptable levels lending an index of robustness of the optimal choices of the strategies advocated by the MCDM methodologies adopted in the present case study.

[1]  N. Vedaraman,et al.  Performance and emission study of Mahua oil (madhuca indica oil) ethyl ester in a 4-stroke natural aspirated direct injection diesel engine , 2005 .

[2]  Octavio Armas,et al.  Effect of biodiesel fuels on diesel engine emissions , 2008 .

[3]  J. R. San Cristóbal,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the VIKOR method. , 2011 .

[4]  Hwai Chyuan Ong,et al.  Comparison of palm oil, Jatropha curcas and Calophyllum inophyllum for biodiesel: A review , 2011 .

[5]  E. R. Jayaratne,et al.  Influence of fuel composition on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from a fleet of in-service passenger cars , 2007 .

[6]  Haji Hassan Masjuki,et al.  A comprehensive review on biodiesel as an alternative energy resource and its characteristics , 2012 .

[7]  Haji Hassan Masjuki,et al.  Impacts of biodiesel combustion on NOx emissions and their reduction approaches , 2013 .

[8]  Reyes García-Contreras,et al.  Effect of the alcohol type used in the production of waste cooking oil biodiesel on diesel performance and emissions , 2008 .

[9]  M. Yurdakul,et al.  Application of correlation test to criteria selection for multi criteria decision making (MCDM) models , 2009 .

[10]  Jon D. Erickson,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Analysis: Overview and Implications for Environmental Decision Making , 2007 .

[11]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Siddharth Jain,et al.  Prospects of biodiesel from Jatropha in India: A review , 2010 .

[14]  E. R. Jayaratne,et al.  The effects of fuel characteristics and engine operating conditions on the elemental composition of emissions from heavy duty diesel buses , 2007 .

[15]  Eunnyeong Heo,et al.  Selecting sustainable renewable energy source for energy assistance to North Korea , 2011 .

[16]  Mohand Tazerout,et al.  Ethanol animal fat emulsions as a diesel engine fuel – Part 2: Engine test analysis , 2006 .

[17]  P.-T. Chuang,et al.  Combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Quality Function Deployment for a Location Decision from a Requirement Perspective , 2001 .

[18]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul , 2010 .

[19]  I. M. Rizwanul Fattah,et al.  Production and comparison of fuel properties, engine performance, and emission characteristics of biodiesel from various non-edible vegetable oils: A review , 2014 .

[20]  A. Hansen,et al.  DIESEL ENGINE PERFORMANCE AND NOX EMISSIONS FROM OXYGENATED BIOFUELS AND BLENDS WITH DIESEL FUEL , 2006 .

[21]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[22]  Dimitrios C. Rakopoulos,et al.  Comparative performance and emissions study of a direct injection Diesel engine using blends of Diesel fuel with vegetable oils or bio-diesels of various origins , 2006 .

[23]  Subhasish Subhasish,et al.  An experimental investigation on the potential of hydrogen–biohol synergy in the performance-emission trade-off paradigm of a diesel engine , 2016 .

[24]  K. Varde,et al.  Hydrogen aspiration in a direct injection type diesel engine-its effects on smoke and other engine performance parameters , 1983 .

[25]  Bijan Sarkar,et al.  Eclectic decision for the selection of tree borne oil (TBO) as alternative fuel for internal combustion engine. , 2015 .

[26]  Robert L. McCormick,et al.  Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived fuels in diesel engines , 1998 .

[27]  N. V. Deshpande,et al.  Improving the low temperature properties of biodiesel fuel , 2009 .

[28]  Serafim Opricovic,et al.  COMPROMISE IN COOPERATIVE GAME AND THE VIKOR METHOD , 2009 .

[29]  A. Megaritis,et al.  Experimental investigation of the effects of simultaneous hydrogen and nitrogen addition on the emissions and combustion of a diesel engine , 2013 .

[30]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei , 2002 .

[31]  Octavio Armas,et al.  Emissions from a diesel–bioethanol blend in an automotive diesel engine , 2008 .

[32]  Rajeev Jain,et al.  A Fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE method-based heuristic for disassembly line balancing problems , 2014 .

[33]  Prommes Kwanchareon,et al.  Solubility of a diesel-biodiesel-ethanol blend, its fuel properties, and its emission characteristics from diesel engine , 2007 .

[34]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  PROMETHEE V: MCDM problems with segmentation constraints , 1992 .

[35]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[36]  I. M. Rizwanul Fattah,et al.  Feasibility of diesel–biodiesel–ethanol/bioethanol blend as existing CI engine fuel: An assessment of properties, material compatibility, safety and combustion , 2014 .

[37]  Ahmad Jais Alimin,et al.  Trade-off between NOx, Soot and EGR Rates for an IDI Diesel Engine Fuelled with JB5 , 2010 .

[38]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  MCDA methods for sorting and clustering problems : Promethee TRI and Promethee CLUSTER , 2005 .

[39]  Zhen Huang,et al.  Combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a DI diesel engine fueled with ethanol-biodiesel blends , 2011 .

[40]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Decision making in the manufacturing environment using an improved PROMETHEE method , 2010 .

[41]  Sergejus Lebedevas,et al.  Usage of Fuel Mixtures Containing Ethanol and Rapeseed Oil Methyl Esters in a Diesel Engine , 2009 .

[42]  M. Deb,et al.  Multi objective optimization of performance parameters of a single cylinder diesel engine with hydrogen as a dual fuel using pareto-based genetic algorithm , 2014 .

[43]  M. Ciniviz,et al.  An experimental investigation of effect on diesel engine performance and exhaust emissions of addition at dual fuel mode of hydrogen , 2013 .

[44]  Jin Qi,et al.  An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[45]  Caye M. Drapcho,et al.  Biofuels Engineering Process Technology , 2007 .

[46]  Irshad Ahmed,et al.  Oxygenated Diesel: Emissions and Performance Characteristics of Ethanol-Diesel Blends in CI Engines , 2001 .

[47]  Zuo-hua Huang,et al.  Effects of the addition of ethanol and cetane number improver on the combustion and emission characteristics of a compression ignition engine , 2008 .

[48]  Wenming Yang,et al.  Combustion and emissions characteristics of diesel engine fueled by biodiesel at partial load conditions , 2012 .

[49]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  The PROMETHEE-GAIA decision support system for multicriteria investigations , 1994 .

[50]  Ludivine Pidol,et al.  Ethanol–biodiesel–Diesel fuel blends: Performances and emissions in conventional Diesel and advanced Low Temperature Combustions , 2012 .

[51]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems , 1995 .

[52]  Prasun Chakraborti,et al.  Experimental study on the role of ethanol on performance emission trade-off and tribological characteristics of a CI engine , 2016 .