Longitudinal variability of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.

PURPOSE To evaluate the longitudinal variability of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements obtained from optical coherence tomography (OCT), scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO). METHODS Forty-five normal and 43 glaucomatous eyes of 88 subjects were analyzed in this longitudinal study. RNFL thickness was measured by OCT (StatusOCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) and SLP (GDx VCC; Carl Zeiss Meditec). Neuroretinal rim area was measured by CSLO (HRT 3; Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH, Dossenheim, Germany). Three separate measurements taken over an average period of 8.8 +/- 1.2 months were used to evaluate measurement variability. Reproducibility coefficient, coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and sensitivity to change [(97.5 percentile value - 2.5 percentile value)/2 x within-subject standard deviation (Sw)] of the global measures were calculated. The association between RNFL and rim area measurement variability and visual field MD (mean deviation) was evaluated with regression analysis. RESULTS Low variability was found for global and sectorial rim area and RNFL measurements. The reproducibility coefficient, ICC, and sensitivity to change for OCT average RNFL thickness, GDx VCC TSNIT average, and HRT global rim area were 11.7 microm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.5-12.9 microm), 0.97 (0.96-0.98), 10.2 (9.2-11.4); 4.7 microm (4.2-5.1 microm), 0.98 (0.97-0.99), 11.3 (10.2-12.6); and 0.22 mm(2) (0.19-0.24 mm(2)), 0.97 (0.95-0.98), 9.3 (8.4-10.4), respectively. No association was found between OCT (r = 0.010 [95% CI: -0.200-0.219], P = 0.924) and SLP (r = -0.034 [95% CI: -0.241-0.177], P = 0.756) RNFL thickness variances and visual field MD. The association between CSLO rim area variance and visual field MD became insignificant after adjustment for reference height variance. CONCLUSIONS Longitudinal RNFL and neuroretinal rim measurements obtained with OCT, SLP, and CSLO have low variability. As the measurement variability does not change with the severity of glaucoma, these parameters are useful for assessment of glaucoma progression.

[1]  S. Drance,et al.  The area of the neuroretinal rim of the optic nerve in normal eyes. , 1987, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Christopher A Girkin,et al.  Effect of glaucomatous damage on repeatability of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, scanning laser polarimetry, and optical coherence tomography. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  R Ritch,et al.  Peripapillary Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurement Reproducibility Using Scanning Laser Polarimetry , 1998, Journal of glaucoma.

[4]  P. Stratford,et al.  Sample Size Estimation for the Comparison of Competing Measures' Reliability Coefficients , 2003 .

[5]  R. Hitchings,et al.  Reversal of Disc Cupping after Intraocular Pressure Reduction in Topographic Image Series , 2004, Journal of glaucoma.

[6]  J. M. Miller,et al.  Optic disc rim area is related to disc size in normal subjects. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  P. Lichter,et al.  The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[8]  Tetsuya Yamamoto,et al.  Changes in the Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Following a Reduction of Intraocular Pressure After Trabeculectomy , 2000, Journal of glaucoma.

[9]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II measurements , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  Hans G Lemij,et al.  Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs for diagnosing glaucoma , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[11]  D. Montgomery.  Measurement of optic disc and neuroretinal rim areas in normal and glaucomatous eyes. A new clinical method. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[12]  R. Knighton,et al.  Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements using the stratus OCT in normal and glaucomatous eyes. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  G. Mcgwin,et al.  Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  E A Swanson,et al.  Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  W. Feuer,et al.  Quantitative assessment of atypical birefringence images using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  J. Katz,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[18]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Reasons for rim area variability in scanning laser tomography. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  C. Cheung,et al.  American Chinese glaucoma imaging study: a comparison of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in detecting glaucomatous damage. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  E. Blumenthal,et al.  Operator learning effect and interoperator reproducibility of the scanning laser polarimeter with variable corneal compensation. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[21]  L. Labree,et al.  Factors associated with variability in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[22]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[23]  G. Ravalico,et al.  Intersession Reproducibility of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements by GDx-VCC in Healthy and Glaucomatous Eyes , 2006, Ophthalmologica.

[24]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparison of scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of glaucoma. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  Christopher Kai-shun Leung,et al.  Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, I: correlation analysis in glaucoma. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Ran Zeimer,et al.  Test-Retest Variability in Structural and Functional Parameters of Glaucoma Damage in the Glaucoma Imaging Longitudinal Study , 2006, Journal of glaucoma.

[27]  M. Kendall.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[28]  Jeffrey M. Liebmann,et al.  Macular and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurement Reproducibility Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT-3) , 2003, Journal of glaucoma.

[29]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Effect of lowering intraocular pressure on optical coherence tomography measurement of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. , 2007, Ophthalmology.