Modelling the Choice of Tenure and Building Type

A multinomial logistic (MNL) model and a naive nested logistic model are estimated to relate differences in household size, age, income and housing prices to differences in the choice of tenure and building type. The estimated models show that the demand for lower-density options decreases with a reduction in household size and increases with increasing age and real income. Higher rents increase the demand for owner-occupied single-family detached houses. Higher price levels for the ownership option shift demand toward all of the higher-density options, particularly toward high-rise rental apartments. The key assumption underlying the MNL model is examined and shown to not hold true. However, the differences in the predictions made by the two models are too small to matter in the study of the choices among the major building types. Issues regarding the choice of models are discussed in the conclusions.

[1]  Cheol-Joo Cho Joint Choice of Tenure and Dwelling Type: A Multinomial Logit Analysis for the City of Chongju , 1997 .

[2]  Bryan Ellickson,et al.  An alternative test of the hedonic theory of housing markets , 1981 .

[3]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[4]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[5]  A. Karlqvist,et al.  Spatial interaction theory and planning models , 1978 .

[6]  P. Zarembka Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[7]  A. Skaburskis Determinants of Canadian Headship Rates , 1994 .

[8]  D. McFadden,et al.  Specification tests for the multinomial logit model , 1984 .

[9]  J. Levine Rethinking Accessibility and Jobs-Housing Balance , 1998 .

[10]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[11]  A. Skaburskis Gender Differences in Housing Demand , 1997 .

[12]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[13]  Alan A. Carruth,et al.  Location Choice and Labour Market Perceptions: A Discrete Choice Study , 1989 .

[14]  J. Williams,et al.  Race, Community and Conflict: A Study of Sparkbrook. , 1967 .

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[16]  A. Börsch-Supan Tenure Choice and Housing Demand , 1985 .

[17]  Mingche M. Li,et al.  A Logit Model of Homeownership , 1977 .

[18]  Axel Börsch-Supan,et al.  On Discrete Choice Models of Housing Demand , 1988 .

[19]  T. Amemiya QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY , 1981 .

[20]  M. King,et al.  An econometric model of tenure choice and demand for housing as a joint decision , 1980 .

[21]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[22]  Joseph Friedman,et al.  Housing Location and the Supply of Local Public Services , 1975 .

[23]  S. Kim A Model of Rental Housing Choices in the Korean Market , 1992 .

[24]  G. Maddala Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[25]  J. D. T. Oliveira,et al.  The Asymptotic Theory of Extreme Order Statistics , 1979 .

[26]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[27]  C. L. Mallows,et al.  Individual Choice Behaviour. , 1961 .

[28]  T. W. Freeman,et al.  Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction , 1978 .

[29]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation , 1995 .

[30]  E. J. Gumbel,et al.  Statistics of Extremes. , 1960 .

[31]  D. McFadden,et al.  URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND - A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS , 1977 .

[32]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Book Review: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications , 1982 .