Model selection through robustness and fidelity criteria: Modeling the dynamics of the CX-100 wind turbine blade

Several plausible modeling strategies are available to develop numerical models for simulating the dynamics of wind turbine blades. While the modeling strategy is typically selected according to expert judgment, the “best” modeling approach is unknown to the model developer. Thus, comparing plausible modeling strategies through a systematic and rigorous approach becomes necessary. This manuscript departs from the conventional approach that selects the model with the highest fidelity-to-data; and instead explores the trade-off between fidelity of model predictions to experiments and robustness of model predictions to model imprecision and inexactness. Exploring robustness in addition to fidelity lends credibility to the model, ensuring model predictions can be trusted even when lack-of-knowledge in the modeling assumptions and/or input parameters result in unforeseen errors and uncertainties. This concept is demonstrated on the CX-100 wind turbine blade in an experimental configuration with large masses added to load the blade in bending during vibration testing. The finite element model of the blade is built with shell elements and validated against experimental evidence, while the large masses are modeled according to two different, but plausible strategies using (i) a combination of point-mass and spring elements, and (ii) solid elements. These two modeling strategies are evaluated considering both the fidelity of the natural frequency predictions against experiments, and the robustness of the predicted natural frequencies to uncertainties in the input parameters. By considering robustness during model selection, the authors determine the extent to which prediction accuracy deteriorates as the lack-of-knowledge increases. The findings suggest the model with solid elements offers a higher degree of fidelity-to-data and robustness to uncertainties, thus providing a superior modeling strategy than the model with point masses and stiffening springs.

[1]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Info-gap robustness for the correlation of tests and simulations of a non-linear transient , 2004 .

[2]  Walter Musial,et al.  Determining equivalent damage loading for full-scale wind turbine blade fatigue tests , 2000 .

[3]  H. Keselman,et al.  Backward, forward and stepwise automated subset selection algorithms: Frequency of obtaining authentic and noise variables , 1992 .

[4]  C. Mallows More comments on C p , 1995 .

[5]  G. Park,et al.  Towards the Experimental Assessment of NLBeam for Modeling Large Deformation Structural Dynamics , 2012 .

[6]  Matthew F. Barone,et al.  Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: Validation metrics , 2004, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Simulating the dynamics of wind turbine blades: part I, model development and verification , 2011 .

[8]  Sven Erik Jørgensen Info-Gap, Decision Theory , 2008 .

[9]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Simulating the dynamics of wind turbine blades: part II, model validation and uncertainty quantification , 2013 .

[10]  Colin L. Mallows,et al.  Some Comments on Cp , 2000, Technometrics.

[11]  N. Lazar,et al.  Methods and Criteria for Model Selection , 2004 .

[12]  C. L. Mallows Some comments on C_p , 1973 .

[13]  Laura Painton Swiler,et al.  Calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis: What's what , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Daniel L. Laird,et al.  Estimation of uncertain material parameters using modal test data , 1998 .

[15]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Robustness, fidelity and prediction-looseness of models , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  Ian Fleming,et al.  A model for the structural dynamic response of the CX‐100 wind turbine blade , 2014 .

[17]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Challenges in modelling the unsteady aerodynamics of wind turbines , 2002 .

[18]  James O. Berger,et al.  Objective Bayesian Methods for Model Selection: Introduction and Comparison , 2001 .

[19]  Gyuhae Park,et al.  Full-scale fatigue tests of CX-100 wind turbine blades. Part I: testing , 2012, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[20]  J. Dickey,et al.  Bayesian Decision Theory and the Simplification of Models , 1980 .

[21]  D. C. Quarton,et al.  The evolution of wind turbine design analysis—a twenty year progress review , 1998 .

[22]  David Draper,et al.  Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty , 2011 .

[23]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Bayesian validation assessment of multivariate computational models , 2008 .

[24]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Defining predictive maturity for validated numerical simulations , 2010 .

[25]  Ola Carlson,et al.  Validation of fixed speed wind turbine dynamic models with measured data , 2007 .

[26]  Sylvain Arlot,et al.  A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection , 2009, 0907.4728.

[27]  Wasserman,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[28]  Sez Atamturktur,et al.  Prioritization of Code Development Efforts in Partitioned Analysis , 2013, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[29]  F. M. Jensen,et al.  Structural testing and numerical simulation of a 34 m composite wind turbine blade , 2006 .

[30]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Simulating the Dynamics of the CX-100 Wind Turbine Blade: Model Selection Using a Robustness Criterion , 2013 .

[31]  Daniel L. Laird,et al.  NuMAD User's Manual , 2001 .

[32]  H. Bozdogan,et al.  Akaike's Information Criterion and Recent Developments in Information Complexity. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[33]  Kendra L. Van Buren,et al.  Simulating the Dynamics of Wind Turbine Blades: Part II, Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification , 2011 .

[34]  I. J. Myung,et al.  The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[35]  S. Report,et al.  The Sandia 100-meter All-glass Baseline Wind Turbine Blade: SNL100-00 , 2011 .

[36]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Challenges in Modeling the Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines , 2002 .