Relation of project managers' personality and project performance: an approach based on value stream mapping

Purpose: This work investigates the influence of project managers’ personality on the success of a project in a Multinational Corporation. The methodology proposed for analyzing the project managers’ personality is based on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Design/methodology/approach: Forty projects carried out in 2012 by multinational corporation, concerning new product development (NPD), have been analyzed, comparing the profile of project managers with results obtained in terms of traditional performance indexes (time delay and over-budget of projects) and performance indexes usually used in “Lean Production” sector (waste time and type of “wastes”). A detailed analysis of the most important “wastes” during the project development is carried out using the Value Stream Mapping (VSM) technique. Findings and Originality/value: Relying on the Myers–Briggs personality instrument, results show that extroverted managers (as opposed to introverted managers) carry out projects that show lower delay and lower waste time. Introverted managers often make “Over-processing” and “Defect” types of waste. Moreover, lower delay and over-budget have been shown by perceiving managers. Research limitations: Regarding the limitations of this work it is necessary to highlight that we collected data from project managers in a retrospective way. While we believe that several aspects of our data collection effort helped enhance the accuracy of the results, future research could conduct real-time case study research to get more detailed insights into the proposed relationships and avoid retrospective bias. Moreover we focused on a single respondent, the project manager. This helped us ensure that their interpretations played an important role in product development. But, we cannot examined the opinion of team members that could be different from project managers opinion regarding some questions. Originality/value: This research provides insight useful to develop proactive approaches to prevent project failures, including the creation of more effective messages and methods to help companies to make the best choices during managers´ hiring. Moreover this research would allow organizations to better match the short-term organizational needs with appropriate personality types.

[1]  J. McPherson,et al.  Formative assessment: how am I doing? , 1995, The Lancet.

[2]  S. Davis,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Project Managers’ Emotional Intelligence on Their Interpersonal Competence , 2011 .

[3]  M Crawford Commerce sees the future; says industry practices must change. , 1987, Science.

[4]  Kathryn A. Ingle,et al.  Reverse Engineering , 1996, Springer US.

[5]  Jennifer A. Farris,et al.  Evaluating the Relative Performance of Engineering Design Projects: A Case Study Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Don T. Phillips,et al.  Application of a concept development process to evaluate process layout designs using value stream mapping and simulation , 2011 .

[7]  Sue Hutchinson,et al.  Front‐line managers as agents in the HRM‐performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence , 2007 .

[8]  Annabel M. Johnson,et al.  A Higher Order Analysis of the Factor Structure of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 2001 .

[9]  R. Müller,et al.  Choosing Appropriate Project Managers: Matching their Leadership Style to the Type of Project , 2006 .

[10]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Optimizing Project Success by Matching PM Style with Project Type , 2000 .

[11]  R. Bar-On Emotional and social intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Quotient Inventory. , 2000 .

[12]  Ashok Mohanty,et al.  Activity modes selection for project crashing through deterministic simulation , 2011 .

[13]  Mohammed Othman,et al.  Workforce scheduling: A new model incorporating human factors , 2012 .

[14]  Larry A. Smith,et al.  Conflict-Handling and Personality Dimensions of Project-Management Personnel , 1985 .

[15]  Patrick R. Wheeler The Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator and Applications to Accounting Education and Research , 2001 .

[16]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Learning to see , 1996 .

[17]  A. Posner Learning to see. , 1955, Eye, ear, nose & throat monthly.

[18]  Myers,et al.  Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type , 1980 .

[19]  G. Prabhakar What is Project Success: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[20]  James D. A. Parker,et al.  The handbook of emotional intelligence : theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace , 2000 .

[21]  Dean R. Gehring Applying Traits Theory of Leadership to Project Management , 2007 .

[22]  Colin B. Ferguson,et al.  Cognitive style factors affecting database query performance , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[23]  David E. Booth,et al.  The impact and management of cognitive gap in high performance product development organizations , 2006 .

[24]  D. Jackson,et al.  PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW , 2006 .

[25]  Walter Fernandez,et al.  Success in IT projects: A matter of definition? , 2008 .

[26]  P. Salovey,et al.  Models of emotional intelligence , 2000 .

[27]  Sharlett Gillard,et al.  The Competencies of Effective Project Managers: A Conceptual Analysis , 2005 .

[28]  Jason Dolfi,et al.  The subliminal characteristics of project managers: An exploratory study of optimism overcoming challenge in the project management work environment , 2007 .

[29]  Paul L. Bannerman,et al.  Defining project success: A multi-level framework , 2008 .

[30]  Rob Feltham,et al.  Interim Managers: Distinguishing Personality Characteristics of Managers on Short-term Contracts , 1999 .

[31]  Rendel D. de Jong,et al.  Personality, Self‐Efficacy and Functioning in Management Teams: A Contribution to Validation , 1999 .

[32]  Ki-Young Jeong,et al.  Measuring efficiency of lean six sigma project implementation using data envelopment analysis at Nasa , 2013 .

[33]  C. G. Jung Psychological Types , 2000 .

[34]  Tanja Hueber Advanced Project Management A Structured Approach , 2016 .

[35]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[36]  C. Bauch Lean Product Development: Making Waste Transparent , 2004 .

[37]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Product Failure Rates: A Reprise , 1987 .

[38]  Fadi P. Deek,et al.  Exploring the underlying aspects of pair programming: The impact of personality , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..