Considering trade policies for liquid biofuels

This report addresses the issues associated with trade in liquid biofuels is a second Energy Sector Management Assistance Program report on biofuels, and part of a broader assessment of bioenergy undertaken by the World Bank. The report asks how liberalizing trade in liquid biofuels might affect biofuel production and consumption. Bioenergy is playing an increasingly important role as an alternative and renewable source of energy. Bioenergy includes solid biomass, biogas, and liquid biofuels. Combustion of biomass residues for heat and power generation is commercially viable without government support in some applications. Liquid biofuels made from biomass are attracting growing interest worldwide, driven by concerns about energy security, climate change, and local environmental considerations and a desire to support domestic agriculture. The global liquid biofuel market today utilizes so called first generation technologies and relies mainly on agricultural food or feed crops for feedstock. Second generation biofuels, still far from commercially viable, can open up many new opportunities because they can be sourced from a much wider variety of feedstock's, vastly expanding the potential for fuel production and for abating greenhouse gas emission. The timing of commercialization is uncertain, although some industry analysts indicate that the needed cost reductions may be achieved in the coming decade. Focusing primarily on ethanol and biodiesel, the report takes a time horizon of the next 5 to 10 years. It outlines the important link between agriculture and biofuels, reviews past and present government policies for agriculture and for biofuels, and considers how these policies might affect the world biofuel market. The report highlights the links between the markets for oil, biofuels, feedstock's, and the by-products of biofuel processing. It reviews existing studies, examining the likely consequences of much larger biofuel production and trade liberalization of biofuels and their feedstock's. It concludes with policy considerations.

[1]  C. Runge,et al.  How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor , 2007 .

[2]  Guenter Schamel,et al.  The International Competitiveness of the U.S. Corn-Ethanol Industry , 2006 .

[3]  Amani Elobeid,et al.  Removal of U.S. Ethanol Domestic and Trade Distortions: Impact on U.S. and Brazilian Ethanol Markets , 2006 .

[4]  Robert Bacon,et al.  Coping with Higher Oil Prices , 2006 .

[5]  Masami Kojima,et al.  Potential for biofuels for transport in developing countries , 2006 .

[6]  R. Schnepf European Union Biofuels Policy and Agriculture: An Overview , 2006 .

[7]  W. Martin,et al.  The relative importance of global agricultural subsidies and market access , 2006, World Trade Review.

[8]  Ronald Steenblik,et al.  Liberalisation of Trade in Renewable-Energy Products and Associated Goods: Charcoal, Solar Photovoltaic Systems, and Wind Pumps and Turbines , 2005 .

[9]  Ronald Steenblik,et al.  Environmental Goods: A Comparison of the APEC and OECD Lists , 2005 .

[10]  M. Olarreaga,et al.  Sugar Prices, Labor Income, and Poverty in Brazil , 2005 .

[11]  Päivi Aakko,et al.  NExBTL - Biodiesel Fuel of the Second Generation , 2005 .

[12]  W. Martin,et al.  Doha Merchandise Trade Reform: What's at Stake for Developing Countries? , 2005 .

[13]  T. Koizumi,et al.  Impacts of the Brazilian Ethanol Program on the World Ethanol and Sugar Market: An Econometric Simulation Approach , 2005 .

[14]  John C. Beghin,et al.  Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries , 2004 .

[15]  J. Nash,et al.  Agriculture and the WTO: Creating a Trading System for Development , 2004 .

[16]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Sugar policies opportunity for change , 2004 .

[17]  M. Delucchi A Lifecycle Emissions Model (LEM): Lifecycle Emissions from Transportation Fuels, Motor Vehicles, Transportation Modes, Electricity Use, Heating and Cooking Fuels, and Materials , 2003 .

[18]  D. Byerlee Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of Privatization , 2002 .

[19]  K. Gwilliam Transport fuel taxes and urban air quality , 2001 .

[20]  R. Bacon Petroleum Taxes : Trends in Fuel Taxes (and Subsidies) and the Implications , 2001 .

[21]  Geoffrey J. Bannister,et al.  International Trade and Poverty Alleviation , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  J. Womach Agricultural Marketing Assistance Loans and Loan Deficiency Payments , 2000 .

[23]  John Sheehan,et al.  An Overview of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel Life Cycles , 2000 .

[24]  Michael Wang,et al.  Effects of Fuel Ethanol Use on Fuel-Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 1999 .

[25]  A. Krueger,et al.  The Political Economy of Agricultural Pricing Policy , 1992 .

[26]  T. W. Berrie,et al.  Energy sector management assistance program: United Nations Development Program/World Bank Industry and Energy Department, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, 1987, 9 pp, free , 1987 .

[27]  Hans Mundlak Yair Yang Maw-Cheng Bowers Alan Binswanger On the determinants of cross-country aggregate agricultural supply , 1987 .

[28]  Lien Chan China, Republic Of , 1984 .

[29]  D. Ricardo On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation , 1891 .

[30]  A. Somwaru,et al.  A Global Analysis of Agricultural Reform in WTO Member Countries , 2006 .

[31]  C. Valdes,et al.  Brazil’s Booming Agriculture Faces Obstacles , 2006 .

[32]  M. G. Nardi Competitiveness Analysis of Argentina, Brazil and United States in Soybean Production, Storage, Transportation, Crushing and Exporting to a Common Market , 2006 .

[33]  W. Martin,et al.  Market Access Barriers in Agriculture and Options for Reform , 2006 .

[34]  W. Simpson Canada abandons Kyoto , 2006 .

[35]  J. Beghin,et al.  Global Agricultural Reform: What is at Stake? , 2005 .

[36]  J. Roseboom Optimizing investment in agricultural research, or the quest for prosperity , 2003 .

[37]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Economic impacts of agricultural research and extension , 2001 .

[38]  B. Turner European Union (EU) , 1999 .

[39]  Tania Loretta Espadas Implications of Transportation Costs in Relation to Soybeans and Related Products: A Comparison of South Carolina, United States, and Sao Paulo, Brazil , 1994 .

[40]  M. Baucus Montana State Legislature (1) , 1981 .

[41]  R. Lipsey,et al.  The General Theory of Second Best , 1956 .

[42]  A. W. Coats,et al.  The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. , 1935 .