Using the Physics of Notations Theory to Evaluate the Visual Notation of SEAM

Modeling languages are used to make models that are commonly used in communicating about real-life situations such as the modeling of business and IT requirements in organizations. A way to evaluate how effective the modeling languages are for communicating their intended messages is to use the set of nine principles defined in the Physics of Notations Theory (PoNT, Moody). PoNT helps designers evaluate the notation of modeling languages and provides guidelines for improving it. We apply this theory to evaluate the visual notation of a systemic method, the Systemic Enterprise Architecture Methodology (SEAM) that is designed to model business and IT requirements. In order to make the SEAM notation more cognitively effective, we identify some notation limitations and provide specific recommendations for improvement for each of the nine PoNT principles.

[1]  Alain Wegmann,et al.  Where do goals come from: the underlying principles of goal-oriented requirements engineering , 2005, 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE'05).

[2]  Daniel Amyot,et al.  Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 Visual Notation , 2010, SLE.

[3]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[4]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  Using the “Physics” of notations to analyze a visual representation of business decision modeling , 2012, 2012 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC).

[5]  Patrick Heymans,et al.  Visual syntax does matter: improving the cognitive effectiveness of the i* visual notation , 2010, Requirements Engineering.

[6]  Daniel Amyot,et al.  Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the UCM visual notation , 2010, SAM'10.

[7]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Cognitive dimensions: Achievements, new directions, and open questions , 2006, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[8]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG) , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[9]  Daniel L. Moody.  The "physics" of notations: a scientific approach to designing visual notations in software engineering , 2010, 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering.

[10]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Evaluating the Visual Syntax of UML: An Analysis of the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UMLFamily of Diagrams , 2009, SLE.

[11]  John Krogstie,et al.  Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Alain Wegmann,et al.  A Philosophical Foundation for Business and IT Alignment in Enterprise Architecture with the Example of SEAM , 2013, BMSD 2013.