Characterizing Shortest Paths in Road Systems Modeled as Manhattan Poisson Line Processes

In this paper, we model a transportation network by a Cox process where the road systems are modeled by a Manhattan Poisson line process (MPLP) and the locations of vehicles and desired destination sites, such as gas stations or charging stations, referred to as facilities, are modeled by independent 1D Poisson point processes (PPP) on each of the lines. For this setup, we characterize the length of the shortest path between a typical vehicular user and its nearest facility that can be reached by traveling along the streets. For a typical vehicular user starting from an intersection, we derive the closed-form expression for the exact cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the length of the shortest path to its nearest facility in the sense of path distance. Building on this result, we derive an upper bound and a remarkably accurate but approximate lower bound on the CDF of the shortest path distance to the nearest facility for a typical vehicle starting from an arbitrary position on a road. These results can be interpreted as nearest-neighbor distance distributions (in terms of the path distance) for this Cox process, which is a key technical contribution of this paper. In addition to these analytical results, we also present a simulation procedure to characterize any distance-dependent cost metric between a typical vehicular user and its nearest facility in the sense of path distance using graphical interpretation of the spatial model. We also discuss extension of this work to other cost metrics and possible applications to the areas of urban planning, personnel deployment and wireless communication.

[1]  Volker Schmidt,et al.  Fitting of stochastic telecommunication network models via distance measures and Monte–Carlo tests , 2006, Telecommun. Syst..

[2]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[3]  T. Mattfeldt Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1996 .

[4]  Frédéric Morlot,et al.  A population model based on a Poisson line tessellation , 2012, 2012 10th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[5]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[6]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[7]  François Baccelli,et al.  A correlated shadowing model for urban wireless networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[8]  R E Miles RANDOM POLYGONS DETERMINED BY RANDOM LINES IN A PLANE. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  P. Diaconis,et al.  Hammersley's interacting particle process and longest increasing subsequences , 1995 .

[10]  François Baccelli,et al.  An Analytical Framework for Coverage in Cellular Networks Leveraging Vehicles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[11]  Jingyi Lin Spatial analysis and modeling of urban transportation networks , 2017 .

[12]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  MmWave Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communication: Analysis of Urban Microcellular Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  D. Aldous,et al.  Connected Spatial Networks over Random Points and a Route-Length Statistic , 2010, 1003.3700.

[14]  Martin Tomko,et al.  Street Network Studies: from Networks to Models and their Representations , 2018, Networks and Spatial Economics.

[15]  Stephen Marshall,et al.  Line structure representation for road network analysis , 2016 .

[16]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[17]  C. Gloaguen,et al.  Distributional properties of euclidean distances in wireless networks involving road systems , 2009, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[18]  Harpreet S. Dhillon,et al.  Downlink Coverage Analysis for a Finite 3-D Wireless Network of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[19]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  An Indoor Correlated Shadowing Model , 2014, 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[20]  François Baccelli,et al.  Stochastic geometry and architecture of communication networks , 1997, Telecommun. Syst..

[21]  François Baccelli,et al.  Poisson Cox Point Processes for Vehicular Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[22]  Harpreet S. Dhillon,et al.  Coverage Analysis of a Vehicular Network Modeled as Cox Process Driven by Poisson Line Process , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[23]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Stochastic Geometry for Wireless Networks , 2012 .

[24]  Volker Schmidt,et al.  Analysis of Shortest Paths and Subscriber Line Lengths in Telecommunication Access Networks , 2010 .

[25]  Volker Schmidt,et al.  Simulation of typical Cox–Voronoi cells with a special regard to implementation tests , 2005, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[26]  Harpreet S. Dhillon,et al.  Success Probability and Area Spectral Efficiency of a VANET Modeled as a Cox Process , 2018, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[27]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[28]  Orestis Georgiou,et al.  Spatial networks with wireless applications , 2018, 1803.04166.

[29]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.