Political persuasion on social media: A moderated moderation model of political discussion disagreement and civil reasoning

Abstract Social media and news use arguably contribute to the prevalence of contentious politics because individuals may express dissent through their social networks as they consume news. This study seeks to test whether individuals might be more open to political persuasion in this context, especially if they are exposed to political disagreement or discuss politics in a civil manner. Relying on survey data from the UK, results based on a moderated moderation model show that (a) social media news use predicts political persuasion on social media (direct effects) and, (b) discussion disagreement and civil reasoning moderate this relationship in two-way and three-way interactions.

[1]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization , 2012 .

[2]  Benjamin H. Detenber,et al.  The Impact of Synchronicity and Civility in Online Political Discussions on Perceptions and Intentions to Participate , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  John Gastil,et al.  Public Deliberation as the Organizing Principle of Political Communication Research , 2007 .

[4]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[5]  BarabasJason.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. , 2015 .

[6]  Raymond J. Pingree,et al.  News Recommendations from Social Media Opinion Leaders: Effects on Media Trust and Information Seeking , 2015, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[8]  Pablo Barberá.  How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization . Evidence from Germany , Spain , and the U . S . , 2014 .

[9]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  Of Attitudes and Engagement: Clarifying the Reciprocal Relationship Between Civic Attitudes and Political Participation , 2010 .

[10]  Ingrid Bachmann,et al.  News Platform Preference as a predictor of political and civic participation , 2013 .

[11]  Marc Perelló-Sobrepere,et al.  Affective publics: sentiment, technology, and politics , 2017 .

[12]  Jennifer Brundidge.  Encountering "Difference" in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks , 2010 .

[13]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[14]  Brian E. Weeks,et al.  Motivations for Political Discussion: Antecedents and Consequences on Civic Engagement , 2016 .

[15]  T. Clifton Morgan,et al.  Political science , 2012, Nature.

[16]  W. Wood.  Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[18]  Kay M. Palan,et al.  The Effects of Gender and Argument Strength on the Processing of Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2006 .

[19]  Lindsay H. Hoffman,et al.  All the news that's fit to post: A profile of news use on social networking sites , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion: Preface , 1992 .

[21]  Lauren Feldman,et al.  The Opinion Factor: The Effects of Opinionated News on Information Processing and Attitude Change , 2011 .

[22]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects , 1997 .

[23]  Yonghwan Kim,et al.  The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  L. Bode.  Political News in the News Feed: Learning Politics from Social Media , 2016 .

[25]  Jennifer Gibbs,et al.  Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Kevin Arceneaux,et al.  Identifying the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising , 2007 .

[27]  Sean J. Westwood,et al.  Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media , 2014, Commun. Res..

[28]  Nitin Agarwal,et al.  A study of homophily on social media , 2012, World Wide Web.

[29]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[30]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[31]  Elihu Katz,et al.  News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative Democracy , 1999 .

[32]  Jae Kook Lee,et al.  Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites , 2017, New Media Soc..

[33]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging , 2010 .

[34]  Romero Gil de Zuniga.  Modeling the Process of Political Participation in the EU , 2012 .

[35]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Political Persuasion: The Birth of a Field of Study , 1996 .

[36]  H. G. D. Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships , 2014 .

[37]  Steven E. Barkan,et al.  The social movement society : contentious politics for a new century , 1999 .

[38]  Jae Kook Lee,et al.  Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization , 2014 .

[39]  W. Bennett,et al.  THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[40]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[41]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  COMMUNICATION THEORY Communication Theory ISSN 1050-3293 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Campaigns, Reflection, and Deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R Model of Communication Effects , 2022 .

[42]  David C. Barker,et al.  Media Favoritism and Presidential Nominations: Reviving the Direct Effects Model , 2006 .

[43]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[44]  Melissa S. Williams.  Everyday talk in the deliberative system (1999) , 2018 .

[45]  Benjamin K. Johnson,et al.  PARTISAN MEDIA EXPOSURE AND AFFECTIVE POLARIZATION Implications of Pro-and Counter-Attitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization , 2014 .

[46]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  Digital Media and Political Participation , 2015 .

[47]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[48]  M. Barnidge,et al.  Egocentric publics and corrective action , 2016 .

[49]  H. G. Zúñiga.  Toward a European Public Sphere? The Promise and Perils of Modern Democracy in the Age of Digital and Social Media , 2015 .

[50]  Gabriel S. Lenz,et al.  Exploiting a Rare Shift in Communication Flows to Document News Media Persuasion: The 1997 United Kingdom General Election , 2008 .

[51]  Penny S. Visser,et al.  Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks , 2009 .

[52]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[53]  M. Durfee,et al.  Contentious Politics , 2017 .

[54]  C. Hunsberger,et al.  Action planning to improve issues of effectiveness, representation and scale in public participation: A conference report , 2007 .

[55]  Michael E. Morrell.  Deliberation, Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy , 2005 .

[56]  P. J. Conover,et al.  The deliberative potential of political discussion , 2002 .

[57]  Stephen L. Elkin.  Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform , 1991 .

[58]  Melinda R. Tarsi,et al.  PERSUASION FROM BELOW? , 2016 .

[59]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[60]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks , 2005 .

[61]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Political persuasion and attitude change , 1996 .

[62]  John Gastil,et al.  By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy Through Deliberative Elections , 2000 .

[63]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[64]  H. G. D. Zúñiga,et al.  Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits , 2013 .

[65]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Climate on Cable , 2012 .

[66]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Political Network Size and Its Antecedents and Consequences , 2013 .

[67]  Jay D. Hmielowski,et al.  Clicking vs. sharing: The relationship between online news behaviors and political knowledge , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[68]  G. Barnett,et al.  Social Network Influence on Online Behavioral Choices , 2014 .

[69]  Lawrence A. Hosman,et al.  The Impact of Power-of-Speech Style, Argument Strength, and Need for Cognition on Impression Formation, Cognitive Responses, and Persuasion , 2002 .

[70]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  A New Space for Political Behavior: Political Social Networking and its Democratic Consequences , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[71]  Michael Bosnjak,et al.  Methods for Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels , 2016 .

[72]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation , 2009 .

[73]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[74]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[75]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  The "Nasty Effect: " Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[76]  Matthew Barnidge,et al.  The role of news in promoting political disagreement on social media , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[77]  Brian E. Weeks,et al.  Online Influence? Social Media Use, Opinion Leadership, and Political Persuasion , 2015 .

[78]  Larry M. Bartels.  Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions , 2002 .

[79]  Amy S. Mitchell,et al.  State of the news media 2016 , 2016 .

[80]  Jae Kook Lee,et al.  Cross-cutting exposure on social networking sites: The effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[81]  Brian E. Weeks,et al.  Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction , 2016, New Media Soc..

[82]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks , 2004 .